You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
These are some ideas of future possible extensions (new features) we can have in the model that are not yet in our current pipeline, depending on the users' needs:
Include other objective functions like maximising revenues given a set of electricity prices.
Multi-objective (include societal benefit, land use, etc)
Add one-way or two-way contracts for difference (CfDs) for an asset's bidding to determine the asset's revenues in the model.
Add Flow-based market coupling (FBMC) feature using PTDFs (useful for EU runs).
Consider HVDC cables in the formulation of the DC-OPF.
Negative electricity prices (if not already in the pipeline)
Export of final problem (obj, vars, consts) for user to check/view - relevant once multi-detail & optional constraints
Run model unattended on a server/cluster
Rough estimate of run-time before you run (mins, hours, days) - I think this is nicer/simpler than a progress bar - maybe we can get a feel for this based on the features selected (ramping, clustering, etc) and problem size? Then as people use Tulipa we could get feedback and adjust our estimate? 8D
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
These are some ideas of future possible extensions (new features) we can have in the model that are not yet in our current pipeline, depending on the users' needs:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions