Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Thoughts on future iterations #12

Open
dajmcdon opened this issue Mar 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Thoughts on future iterations #12

dajmcdon opened this issue Mar 19, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@dajmcdon
Copy link
Member

dajmcdon commented Mar 19, 2024

Potential large projects

  1. Setting up JupyterHub and autograding functionality for Labs and/or Homeworks. Perhaps not that difficult using the existing DSCI infrastructure. Solutions can be validated with {digest}
  2. Accomodate Python and/or Julia? Students always ask, but it would involve lots of duplication in the current state.
  3. Make it partially flipped.
  4. Switch HW/Labs to Quarto. Ongoing difficulty:
    • pdf output is easier for the TAs to grade, but gets long, paged, LaTeX headaches.
    • HTML output is hard to grade, but avoids LaTeX install headaches.

Potential structure changes

  • Perhaps do Module 5 (Unsupervised) earlier. Or create something called "Feature creation" that bundles dimension reduction, basis expansions, some amount of the deep learning material.
  • Students may need less {tidyverse} and GitHub than they did previously.
  • Revisit using UBC GitHub.
  • Explore changing the prerequisites (possibly just Stat 301).
  • Worth incorporating other GLMs (besides logistic regression).
  • Module 5 is a bit juvenile. It used to include other manifold learning stuff, but it took too much time.

Potential grading changes

  • The 35% final is still a bit generous, so final grades are high (~ 82 average) even though the median on the final is about 50%.
  • Could add a Midterm (and see below). Maybe 30% on the final 15% on a midterm. Effort for the rest.
  • Less weight on labs (perhaps 1.5 points each)
  • Some students still shirk on the clickers. The <25% penalty is very hard to enforce.
  • Would be nice to have non-multiple choice exam. But horrible to mark.
  • An IRT of the final would likely not be flattering (some questions are not discriminatory).

Comments from peer and student feedback

  • Some students would actually like to see midterms. Though this means dealing with absences/excuses. This can also increase student anger at the instructor and lead to lower evals.
  • Find a way to do more "live coding" (peer). Also, more "written" mathematics.
  • Find a way to discuss HW and Lab solutions somewhere. (Perhaps every other lab "done" during the section, alternate is discussion of solutions).
  • Monday labs haven't always seen the material yet. But deadlines are tied to the section meetings. I doubt this is that big a deal. Suggestion was "all due on Friday".
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant