You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am wondering if I could get some clarification on Part 1 (a) and Part 1 (c) of the problem set.
As for Part 1 (a), I can't seem to find the cutoff point/threshold where the submission would not be judged. Please correct me if I'm wrong. My impression from reading the Netflix rule is that all submissions would be judged, but for a submission to be qualified for winning, it has to achieve 10% improvement of RMSE. But, I couldn't quite figure out the cutoff point for poor performance.
As for Part (c), could you please elaborate more on this part of the question: "What characteristic of one model relative to other models made it improve the overall prediction when blended with the other models?"
Do you mean that we should describe a model in the ensembles?
Any hints would be much appreciated!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am wondering if I could get some clarification on Part 1 (a) and Part 1 (c) of the problem set.
As for Part 1 (a), I can't seem to find the cutoff point/threshold where the submission would not be judged. Please correct me if I'm wrong. My impression from reading the Netflix rule is that all submissions would be judged, but for a submission to be qualified for winning, it has to achieve 10% improvement of RMSE. But, I couldn't quite figure out the cutoff point for poor performance.
As for Part (c), could you please elaborate more on this part of the question: "What characteristic of one model relative to other models made it improve the overall prediction when blended with the other models?"
Do you mean that we should describe a model in the ensembles?
Any hints would be much appreciated!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: