Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Seeking clarification on PA#5 Part 1 (a) and (c) #24

Open
sanittawan opened this issue Nov 16, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Seeking clarification on PA#5 Part 1 (a) and (c) #24

sanittawan opened this issue Nov 16, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@sanittawan
Copy link

I am wondering if I could get some clarification on Part 1 (a) and Part 1 (c) of the problem set.

As for Part 1 (a), I can't seem to find the cutoff point/threshold where the submission would not be judged. Please correct me if I'm wrong. My impression from reading the Netflix rule is that all submissions would be judged, but for a submission to be qualified for winning, it has to achieve 10% improvement of RMSE. But, I couldn't quite figure out the cutoff point for poor performance.

As for Part (c), could you please elaborate more on this part of the question: "What characteristic of one model relative to other models made it improve the overall prediction when blended with the other models?"

Do you mean that we should describe a model in the ensembles?

Any hints would be much appreciated!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant