We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
@sunt05 commented on Aug 2, 2019, 10:56 AM UTC:
better to be resolved at the SUEWS side.
Originally posted by sunt05 in Urban-Meteorology-Reading/WRF-SUEWS#54 (comment)
This issue was moved by sunt05 from Urban-Meteorology-Reading/SUEWS#42.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@sunt05 commented on Aug 5, 2019, 12:56 PM UTC:
Several related papers (in DOI):
http://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0262.1 http://doi.org/10.1175/jamc-d-16-0082.1 http://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-1226
Sorry, something went wrong.
Seems beyond the scope of atmospheric physics—more on the atmospheric chemistry side. Shall we still consider this? @suegrimmond
No branches or pull requests
@sunt05 commented on Aug 2, 2019, 10:56 AM UTC:
better to be resolved at the SUEWS side.
Originally posted by sunt05 in Urban-Meteorology-Reading/WRF-SUEWS#54 (comment)
This issue was moved by sunt05 from Urban-Meteorology-Reading/SUEWS#42.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: