Replies: 1 comment
-
For example Zhou etal. 2017 outlined some straightforward landscape design criteria for their siting of residential shade trees:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
For example Zhou etal. 2017 outlined some straightforward landscape design criteria for their siting of residential shade trees:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Optimal approach to location metaheuristics (near-optimal solutions)
A suggestion made by Nils during the recent online seminar was to run several tree planter scenarios, each run having a specific tree and canopy dimension. This occurs because Tree Planter cannot automatically change these in the simulation.
What would be an optimal approach to optimisation in circumstances where
My question relates to the reasoning one should use to efficiently & effectively combine the scenarios described by Nils into a small number of "most probable solution sets" to run in SOLWEIG. Then to compare the magnitude of heat mitigation for each solution set. I am interested in the reasoning towards "efficient & effective", or "optimal approach" to conducting the tree planter optimisation; i.e something to support the choices made.
Has anyone come across literature that describes an optimal approach to designing such scenarios? I would like to avoid a plug and chug approach, manually spinning scenarios and then guessing the best match (aka. trial and error).
Intuitively I could begin by rezoning the planting area into a gradient of Tmrt max values, and then subdivide the scenarios hierarchically, e.g. highest Tmrt max values --> plant larger trees required. Exclusion criteria would be inherent in the planting polygon dimensions, e.g. building distance < largest canopy width of trees.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions