You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently stackMapping is implemented as Offset -> Node with cell 0 of the node representing the cell for that offset. This is fine in the local phase since if cell 0 of the stack node gets merged into a different offset of another node, the local graph will track it via the union-find data structure. However, once the graph is cloned, the union-find information is lost and hence stack positions which have been updated to be a cell at an offset different to 0 will be lost.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently stackMapping is implemented as Offset -> Node with cell 0 of the node representing the cell for that offset. This is fine in the local phase since if cell 0 of the stack node gets merged into a different offset of another node, the local graph will track it via the union-find data structure. However, once the graph is cloned, the union-find information is lost and hence stack positions which have been updated to be a cell at an offset different to 0 will be lost.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: