Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Undetected and chattering key presses #1004

Open
mondalaci opened this issue Sep 26, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

Undetected and chattering key presses #1004

mondalaci opened this issue Sep 26, 2024 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@mondalaci
Copy link
Member

@jwr reported:

I am pretty sure there is a rare problem with keypresses not being detected or being detected multiple times. Debouncing code might need improvement.

I've also noticed this daily, but I wasn't sure until now. Maybe the key scanner thread should be given higher priority.

@kareltucek
Copy link
Collaborator

Actually, I dont think key scanner is the issue. I think the problem in the new discrete event handling. First I will look into related issues that we can reproduce - that may give some insight or even solve it.

@mondalaci
Copy link
Member Author

This is not an issue for me anymore.

@jwr
Copy link

jwr commented Jan 8, 2025

Hmm. This is still very much an issue for me, but I'm using 12.0.1 (for example, typing this, I just had to delete an additional '1' that appeared at the end of that version number, and then also correct the word 'appeareed'). And I can't use anything past 12.0.1. So, it's difficult for me to confirm that the issue has been fixed.

@mondalaci
Copy link
Member Author

Don't you think this issue is a duplicate of #1077?

@jwr
Copy link

jwr commented Jan 9, 2025

No, I don't think so. I had problems described in this issue for a long time now, and I still have them with 12.0.1. These problems are an annoyance, but they don't make the keyboard unusable. Also, I never saw swapped keystrokes (not in order) with 12.0.1.

What is described in #1077 started happening (in my case) after 12.0.1, and is much more severe.

That said, perhaps the code has been reworked so much that this issue no longer applies at all, but I wouldn't know that.

@mhantsch
Copy link
Contributor

mhantsch commented Jan 9, 2025

I agree to what @jwr said. 12.0.1 has some (occasional) repeats, but is reasonably usable. Later versions were unusable for me; I couldn't type a single meaningful sentence.

@mondalaci mondalaci reopened this Jan 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants