Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Performance is slower than one would of hoped. #6

Open
jasonreich opened this issue Sep 12, 2012 · 7 comments
Open

Performance is slower than one would of hoped. #6

jasonreich opened this issue Sep 12, 2012 · 7 comments

Comments

@jasonreich
Copy link
Contributor

Not as good as the experimental branch. Compare and contrast. Could be;

  • Optimisation flags. Exagerates differences.
  • The known total term constructor. Works well with other fixes.
  • Depth differences
  • Use Hughes lists for paths? Tried and worked slightly.
  • Forcing thunks in calculation of count sums. Tried with no change.
  • Perhaps Integer instead of int? Hard to tell.

...

@jasonreich
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not optimisation flags...

@jasonreich
Copy link
Contributor Author

  • Use Hughes lists for paths?

@jasonreich
Copy link
Contributor Author

  • Forcing thunks in calculation of count sums.

@jasonreich
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not total known term. Stashed for my benefit.

@jasonreich
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ah. Differences are more extreme under -O1 than -O2.

@jasonreich
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not counting sums.

  • Perhaps Integer instead of int?

@jasonreich
Copy link
Contributor Author

Makes near enough no different.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant