Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CAD buttons don't work when TMI is loaded #182

Open
cubinator opened this issue Jun 2, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

CAD buttons don't work when TMI is loaded #182

cubinator opened this issue Jun 2, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@cubinator
Copy link

cubinator commented Jun 2, 2016

I created a new superflat map (with cheats allowed), placed and accessed a CAD and noticed that none of the buttons worked. Nothing happens when clicking on them. The following mods were loaded:

  • CodeChickenCore-1.7.10-1.0.7.47
  • CodeChickenLib-1.7.10-1.1.3.138
  • ForgeMultipart-1.7.10-1.2.0.345
  • ForgeRelocation-1.7.10-0.0.1.4
  • ForgeRelocationFMP-1.7.10-0.0.1.2
  • MrTJPCore-1.7.10
  • buildcraft-7.1.8
  • ComputerCraft1.74
  • Industrial-Craft-2-Mod-Experimental-1.7.10
  • IntegratedCircuits-1.7.10
  • NBTEdit_1.7.10
  • ProjectRed-1.7.10-Compat
  • ProjectRed-1.7.10-Fabrication
  • ProjectRed-1.7.10-Integration
  • ProjectRed-1.7.10-Lighting
  • ProjectRed-1.7.10-Mechanical
  • ProjectRed-1.7.10-World
  • ProjectRed-Base-1.7.10
  • TooManyItems-1.7.10 (obviously)

When removing TMI from the mods-folder and launching Minecraft again, the CAD's buttons suddenly work. When TMI is loaded, the log additionally prints out the following:

[14:21:37] [main/INFO] [STDOUT]: [TMIForgeTransformer:transform:18]: [TMI] Rewriting class bex / net.minecraft.client.gui.inventory.GuiContainer
[14:21:39] [Client thread/ERROR] [FML]: Unable to determine registrant mod for TooManyItems. This is a critical error and should be impossible
java.lang.Throwable
    at cpw.mods.fml.common.eventhandler.EventBus.register(EventBus.java:55) [EventBus.class:?]
    at TMIForgeContainer.<init>(TMIForgeContainer.java:35) [TMIForgeContainer.class:?]
    at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) [?:1.8.0_77]
    at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(Unknown Source) [?:1.8.0_77]
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(Unknown Source) [?:1.8.0_77]
    at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Unknown Source) [?:1.8.0_77]
    at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Unknown Source) [?:1.8.0_77]
    at cpw.mods.fml.common.Loader.identifyMods(Loader.java:340) [Loader.class:?]
    at cpw.mods.fml.common.Loader.loadMods(Loader.java:489) [Loader.class:?]
    at cpw.mods.fml.client.FMLClientHandler.beginMinecraftLoading(FMLClientHandler.java:208) [FMLClientHandler.class:?]
    at net.minecraft.client.Minecraft.func_71384_a(Minecraft.java:480) [bao.class:?]
    at net.minecraft.client.Minecraft.func_99999_d(Minecraft.java:878) [bao.class:?]
    at net.minecraft.client.main.Main.main(SourceFile:148) [Main.class:?]
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) ~[?:1.8.0_77]
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) ~[?:1.8.0_77]
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) ~[?:1.8.0_77]
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source) ~[?:1.8.0_77]
    at net.minecraft.launchwrapper.Launch.launch(Launch.java:135) [launchwrapper-1.11.jar:?]
    at net.minecraft.launchwrapper.Launch.main(Launch.java:28) [launchwrapper-1.11.jar:?]
[14:42:34] [Client thread/INFO] [FML]: [Client thread] Client side modded connection established

I feel like I should report this to the TMI developers, but since this first happened when trying out IntegratedCircuits, I reported it here.

@ljfa-ag
Copy link
Contributor

ljfa-ag commented Jun 2, 2016

Well seems like TMI is doing some weird stuff. There is no source code available so we can't really figure out what it might be. I suggest you report it to the TMI developers.

@Victorious3
Copy link
Owner

I'd recommend switching to NEI, as I have specific support for it and its a more pleasant experience in general.

@ljfa-ag
Copy link
Contributor

ljfa-ag commented Jun 5, 2016

I didn't want to be that guy, but yeah I'd also say that ^^

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants