You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Pretty much as the title says, there are quite a lot of people on the discord who simply disregard belt-tension since it's "a secondary tuning step" and "I've been printing fine so far" that they either completely ignore belt-tension or realize it way too late and already have broken their belts.
Especially now with Tap gaining popularity, there's been cases where people have even ripped their TAP mounts because the belts were too tight.
In my opinion, belt-tension should be moved from the Secondary printer tuning, into the initial startup check, below "verify heaters" this would then entail that after the heaters are checked, and before any movement occurs, the belts will be of proper tension.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Pretty much as the title says, there are quite a lot of people on the discord who simply disregard belt-tension since it's "a secondary tuning step" and "I've been printing fine so far" that they either completely ignore belt-tension or realize it way too late and already have broken their belts.
Especially now with Tap gaining popularity, there's been cases where people have even ripped their TAP mounts because the belts were too tight.
In my opinion, belt-tension should be moved from the Secondary printer tuning, into the initial startup check, below "verify heaters" this would then entail that after the heaters are checked, and before any movement occurs, the belts will be of proper tension.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: