You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the proposal allows an arbitrary "old expression" form '*e' with an eye to eventually allowing 'e'`. I think there are some ambiguities here though. What is the meaning of these forms?
'*v' --- value in _old_ heap identified by _current_ value of v`
'*'v --- value in old heap identified by old value of v
'**v --- value in old heap identified by value in old or new heap identified by current value of v.
This is not making sense. We want two expression forms:
#e the value in the old heap identified by e. This is like *e but for the old heap.
'v the old value of variable v.
Now, we can disambiguate the last case above as either ##v or #*v.
What about method calls? Do we need a syntax like m#() or similar?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
(see also #82)
I need to update this RFC: https://github.com/Whiley/RFCs/blob/master/text/0067-old-values.md
I think we need to separate out two things:
Currently, the proposal allows an arbitrary "old expression" form
'*e' with an eye to eventually allowing
'e'`. I think there are some ambiguities here though. What is the meaning of these forms?'*v' --- value in _old_ heap identified by _current_ value of
v`'*'v
--- value in old heap identified by old value ofv
'**v
--- value in old heap identified by value in old or new heap identified by current value ofv
.This is not making sense. We want two expression forms:
#e
the value in the old heap identified bye
. This is like*e
but for the old heap.'v
the old value of variablev
.Now, we can disambiguate the last case above as either
##v
or#*v
.What about method calls? Do we need a syntax like
m#()
or similar?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: