Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Input data provenance #9

Open
cpaniaguam opened this issue May 17, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Input data provenance #9

cpaniaguam opened this issue May 17, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@cpaniaguam
Copy link
Member

cpaniaguam commented May 17, 2024

@ellenbuckley I'm thinking there is a programmatic way to get the input data. Were these files fetched with a tool like fetchdata or some other tool?
#8

@ellenbuckley
Copy link
Collaborator

they were fetched with requests.get() and an input url. I'm sure there is a better way to do this. And after implementing new cloud mask, it can just use the files fetched from the fetchdata script.

@ellenbuckley
Copy link
Collaborator

and maybe the fetchdata script can also pull the current cloud mask with some tweaks?

@cpaniaguam
Copy link
Member Author

they were fetched with requests.get() and an input url. I'm sure there is a better way to do this. And after implementing new cloud mask, it can just use the files fetched from the fetchdata script.

@ellenbuckley Consider adding that script you used to get the input data files to the repo. We could use it to update fetchdata.

@ellenbuckley
Copy link
Collaborator

@cpaniaguam i added the modis_download_short.ipynb notebook if you want to take a look on the sketchy way I downloaded the data.

@cpaniaguam
Copy link
Member Author

@cpaniaguam i added the modis_download_short.ipynb notebook if you want to take a look on the sketchy way I downloaded the data.

@ellenbuckley Thanks! I will look at it and probably follow up with some questions!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants