New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ALMO and BCFW changes #429

Closed

pokutta opened this issue Sep 29, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #437

Assignees

Member

pokutta commented Sep 29, 2023 •

edited

Loading

ALMO output is suboptimal

BCFW is not reporting what "type" of step it is doing: cyclic, random, etc... (we can use an enum to map names again)
ALM should also provide a header on its own so that it is clear what is running... if someone calls alm and get bcfw this is confusing
Examples for BCFW in examples folder

pokutta assigned matbesancon, pokutta and JannisHal

pokutta changed the title ~~ALMO output is suboptimal~~ ALMO and BCFW changes

JannisHal linked a pull request

that will close this issue

429 almo and bcfw changes #437

Merged

matbesancon closed this as completed in #437

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment