Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Improve zeroization #877

Open
conradoplg opened this issue Feb 18, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Improve zeroization #877

conradoplg opened this issue Feb 18, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@conradoplg
Copy link
Contributor

To provide a better assurance of secrets being zeroized, we might want to implement ZeroizeOnDrop or use https://crates.io/crates/secrecy to wrap secrets (which will change the API).

We should take a look at similar projects and see what are the best practices.

We should also explicitly zeroize stuff where possible (i.e. dkg round2 which takes a round1::SecretPackage)
@conradoplg conradoplg mentioned this issue Feb 18, 2025
Open
@conradoplg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Here they simply implement ZeroizeOnDrop. I think that should be enough. nucypher/rust-umbral#97

@mpguerra mpguerra moved this to Sprint Backlog in FROST Feb 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
FROST
Status: Sprint Backlog
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@conradoplg