Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Magi would operate" → "Magi will operate" ensures tense consistency. #253

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sky-coderay
Copy link

The correction "Magi would operate" → "Magi will operate" is important for maintaining consistency in the use of tenses in the text. Here's why:

  1. Future tense (will): The text describes something that will happen in the future, so using the future tense "will" ensures clarity and consistency. It makes the statement more direct and predictable.

    Example:

    • "Magi will operate" — a clear statement that Magi will function in the future (a fact that is expected).
  2. Conditional tense (would): The word "would" typically implies a hypothetical situation or condition that may not necessarily happen. It’s often used to describe situations that occur under specific conditions (e.g., "if...").

    Example:

    • "Magi would operate" — might imply that it would operate only under certain conditions, introducing uncertainty and making the statement less definitive.

In the context of instructions or descriptions about the future behavior of the system, using "will" is preferred, as it expresses certainty that Magi will operate in the future. This makes the text clearer and more precise.

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant