You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello developers,
is there any way of computing ESP charges associated with a given excited ADC state? In other words, is there any implementation of the calculation of atomic charges (preferably electrostatic fitted charges, but otherwise a population analysis could be a reasonable substitute), using the state ADC(2) density matrix?
If there is any difference, I would prefer an implementation within pyscf, rather than psi4.
Thanks a lot
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
currently there is no such option to obtain ESP charges or similar population analysis.
These would need to be computed backend-side (i.e., making use of pyscf or psi4 directly) because detailed information about the AO basis, evaluation of electrostatic potentials on a grid, etc., are required; all of which have nothing to do with an ADC calculation itself.
Thus, it's easier to implement this feature in user code because a lot of programming and design effort would be required to interface the necessary routines in a unified way to adcc.
So, this could be a good starting point in order to write your own ESP/RESP code. The only problem is that you would need to evaluate the ESP (dot product of the integrals with the density matrix) yourself, since the given code computes the ESP inside psi4, i.e., there's no way to pass the ADC density matrix. However, all required functionality (integrals etc.) is in principle available in either pyscf or psi4.
Hello developers,
is there any way of computing ESP charges associated with a given excited ADC state? In other words, is there any implementation of the calculation of atomic charges (preferably electrostatic fitted charges, but otherwise a population analysis could be a reasonable substitute), using the state ADC(2) density matrix?
If there is any difference, I would prefer an implementation within pyscf, rather than psi4.
Thanks a lot
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: