Skip to content

Rundeck's Key Storage converter plugin mechanism's encryption layer not working in 4.2.0, 4.2.1, 4.3.0

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 15, 2022 in rundeck/rundeck • Updated Jan 27, 2023

Package

maven org.rundeck:rundeck (Maven)

Affected versions

>= 4.2.0, < 4.2.2
>= 4.3.0, < 4.3.1

Patched versions

4.2.2
4.3.1

Description

Impact

The Key Storage converter plugin mechanism was not enabled correctly in Rundeck 4.2.0 and 4.2.1, resulting in use of the encryption layer for Key Storage possibly not working. Any credentials created or overwritten using Rundeck 4.2.0 or 4.2.1 might result in them being written in plaintext to the backend storage.

If you are using a "Storage Converter" plugin, such as jasypt-encryption configured via the rundeck.storage.converter.1.type=jasypt-encryption setting, and you installed 4.2.0 or 4.2.1 then please upgrade to one of the patched versions.

If you do not use a "Storage Converter" plugin, this would not affect you.

Patches

Rundeck 4.3.2 and 4.2.3 have fixed the code and upon upgrade will re-encrypt any plain text values. The fix is also included in 4.4.0 and later releases.

Note: 4.3.0 does not have the vulnerability, but does not include the patch to re-encrypt plain text values if 4.2.0 or 4.2.1 were used. The previously release 4.3.1 and 4.2.2 versions missed some re-encryption use cases that have been fixed in the versions mentioned above.

Workarounds

To prevent plaintext credentials from being stored in Rundeck 4.2.0/4.2.1, write access to key storage can be disabled via ACLs. After upgrading to 4.3.1 or later, write access can be restored.

This aclpolicy document can be used to deny all write access to storage:

---
by:
  group: '.*'
context:
  application: rundeck
for:
  storage:
  - deny:
    - create
    - update
description: deny create or update for storage in application context
---
by:
  group: '.*'
context:
  project: .*
for:
  storage:
  - deny:
    - create
    - update
description: deny create or update for storage in project context

To remove plaintext credentials, the metadata of stored keys can be used to detect if the key was stored with encryption enabled or not. In the case of the “jasypt-encryption” plugin, encrypted values will have a metadata field of “jasypt-encryption:encrypted”:”true” in the JSON metadata. If you are using the relational database as your key storage backend (rundeck.storage.provider.1.type=db), you can query for keys that are unencrypted. Here is an example query for Mysql:

select id,dir,name from storage where json_data not like "%jasypt-encryption:encrypted\":\"true%" and namespace is null and dir like "keys%"

References

Configuration Settings for Storage Converters: https://docs.rundeck.com/docs/administration/configuration/plugins/configuring.html#storage-converter-plugins

About Storage Converters:
https://docs.rundeck.com/docs/manual/key-storage/key-storage.html#key-data-storage-converter

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

References

@fdevans fdevans published to rundeck/rundeck Jun 15, 2022
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Jun 15, 2022
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jun 17, 2022
Reviewed Jun 17, 2022
Last updated Jan 27, 2023

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

EPSS score

0.085%
(38th percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2022-31044

GHSA ID

GHSA-hprf-rrwq-jm5c

Source code

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.