You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Following the objective of having the same code for the detector of MegaPose and CosyPose, there might be an incompatibility of naming for the detected objects.
Currently, in cosypose/integrated/detector.py, line 27, there is a change of ds_name to adapt the name of ycbv.bop19 to ycbv. I am unsure why it was needed in the first hand, but I guess a similar problem could arise for other datasets ? Is this a naming issue between MegaPose and CosyPose ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As for cosypose Detector class (which is pretty much the same as you were mentioning), it is used only in a handful of evaluation script that we (in my knowledge) are not currently attempting to support:
If we actually need to support some of those, then we need to change cosy Detector to the megapose one and run them to see if it works, then we will be able to remove cosypose Detector.
Following the objective of having the same code for the detector of MegaPose and CosyPose, there might be an incompatibility of naming for the detected objects.
Currently, in
cosypose/integrated/detector.py
, line 27, there is a change ofds_name
to adapt the name ofycbv.bop19
toycbv
. I am unsure why it was needed in the first hand, but I guess a similar problem could arise for other datasets ? Is this a naming issue between MegaPose and CosyPose ?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: