-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Complete Agroportal metamodel 2023 #339
Comments
In the metadata curation guide :We have designed a Template to list all the properties in AgroPortal which are 130 properties so far, The properties are classified according to their appearance in the interface which gives the following categories: General, Licensing, Description, Date, People and Organisations, Community, Usage, Methodology, Object description properties, Links, Relations, Content, Media, Metrics and Configuration metadata. Each property has its To guarantee the validity of the metadata, we have added The properties are followed by We were also interested in the statistical side, so we defined the Finally, we specified the |
Might need to open another issue to asses and tracjk changes wrt metadata extraction process. |
See #340 |
Context
We have implemented 2018, significant changes (compare to the NCBO BioPortal) in terms of ontology metadata. This is explained in a publication in Data Semantics Journal: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13740-018-0091-5
A new metadata mode was implemented to support better descriptions of ontologies and their relations with respect to the standards metadata vocabularies used in the semantic web community. We have reviewed the most standard and relevant vocabularies out there to describe metadata for ontologies (such as Dublin Core, VoID, Ontology Metadata Vocabulary, Data Catalog Vocabulary, etc.)
Technically most of the work was:
The new metadata model can be seen here http://data.agroportal.lirmm.fr/submission_metadata
A video presentation was done in 2018, to explain it to the Bioportal team.
The new Goal
Make the portal metadata model the most complaint and consistent with our Metadata curation guide, so that we can reinforce its usage in the code for validation, UI/UX, Help .....
New Requirements
References
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: