You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The latter seems to be more correct in this case, since we are dealing with CRC16 hashes here. 0xFFFF only makes sense when CRC32 hashes are being dealt with. It seems that this library is actually correct with it's hashing, now that I'm scrutinizing it.
in the kermit crc computation, a 0xFFFF mask is used, but when checking with the C lib at
https://github.com/lammertb/libcrc/blob/master/src/crckrmit.c
in the same funciton, the mask used is 0x00FF
which one is correct ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: