You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for producing this excellent piece of work, it makes producing wavelet plots very straightforward indeed. However, I do have a question about the magnitude output. If I have an input signal with two periodic components of equal amplitude, is it possible to normalize the cwt output such that the two components have equal magnitude in the cwt spectrum?
In the attached example I have two components with equal amplitude in the time domain but different magnitudes in the wavelet spectrum. I understand that this is possible in the Matlab cwt implementation: "The cwt function uses L1 normalization. With L1 normalization, if you have equal amplitude oscillatory components in your data at different scales, they will have equal magnitude in the CWT. Using L1 normalization shows a more accurate representation of the signal." (source: https://uk.mathworks.com/help/wavelet/ref/cwt.html#mw_ae84b041-f038-4c11-bf1a-6058481e25a8)
Can I do the same with your toolbox?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
Thanks for producing this excellent piece of work, it makes producing wavelet plots very straightforward indeed. However, I do have a question about the magnitude output. If I have an input signal with two periodic components of equal amplitude, is it possible to normalize the cwt output such that the two components have equal magnitude in the cwt spectrum?
In the attached example I have two components with equal amplitude in the time domain but different magnitudes in the wavelet spectrum. I understand that this is possible in the Matlab cwt implementation: "The cwt function uses L1 normalization. With L1 normalization, if you have equal amplitude oscillatory components in your data at different scales, they will have equal magnitude in the CWT. Using L1 normalization shows a more accurate representation of the signal." (source: https://uk.mathworks.com/help/wavelet/ref/cwt.html#mw_ae84b041-f038-4c11-bf1a-6058481e25a8)
Can I do the same with your toolbox?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: