Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[feature request] Explicitly label mutated bases in simulated reads. #52

Open
SaraEl-Metwally opened this issue Jan 25, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@SaraEl-Metwally
Copy link

Hi,
I would like to know the locations of errors in the simulated read files. Is there any way I can detect the errors locations i.e. n chars, small case letters, ..etc.
Thanks!

@alyssafrazee
Copy link
Owner

Hi, thanks for the request! The only way right now to detect the mutated bases is by matching the output fasta file back to the input reference file based on the label of the read. The labels of the simulated reads tell you which transcript & which positions generated the reads to begin with. So the way to detect mismatches is to write a script that infers them from the fasta file.

We aren't actively adding new features in the forseeable future, but I'll keep this issue open as a feature request in case development picks back up in the future.

@alyssafrazee alyssafrazee changed the title Which bases are mutated. [feature request] Explicitly label mutated bases in simulated reads. Feb 10, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants