You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have been asked whether AMR seeks to encode pragmatics. It seems to me that the guidelines document could use a bit of elaboration on that front.
The AMR Dictionary has an example of a request phrased as a question:
Could you close the door? = Please close the door.: (close-01 :mode imperative :polite +)
What about clear recommendations posed as questions? By analogy to the above, I would guess:
Why don't you come over here and play with the ball? (r / recommend-01 :ARG1 [come over here and play with the ball] :ARG2 (y / you) :polite +)
Are we agreed on this solution? And should the guidelines explain (and illustrate with :polite + examples) that we opt for a nonliteral reading if there is a clear pragmatics?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
nschneid
changed the title
Conversational implicatures
Conversational implicatures/pragmatics
May 25, 2016
I have been asked whether AMR seeks to encode pragmatics. It seems to me that the guidelines document could use a bit of elaboration on that front.
The AMR Dictionary has an example of a request phrased as a question:
(close-01 :mode imperative :polite +)
What about clear recommendations posed as questions? By analogy to the above, I would guess:
(r / recommend-01 :ARG1 [come over here and play with the ball] :ARG2 (y / you) :polite +)
Are we agreed on this solution? And should the guidelines explain (and illustrate with
:polite +
examples) that we opt for a nonliteral reading if there is a clear pragmatics?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: