Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversational implicatures/pragmatics #186

Open
nschneid opened this issue May 25, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Conversational implicatures/pragmatics #186

nschneid opened this issue May 25, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@nschneid
Copy link
Collaborator

I have been asked whether AMR seeks to encode pragmatics. It seems to me that the guidelines document could use a bit of elaboration on that front.

The AMR Dictionary has an example of a request phrased as a question:

  • Could you close the door? = Please close the door.: (close-01 :mode imperative :polite +)

What about clear recommendations posed as questions? By analogy to the above, I would guess:

  • Why don't you come over here and play with the ball? (r / recommend-01 :ARG1 [come over here and play with the ball] :ARG2 (y / you) :polite +)

Are we agreed on this solution? And should the guidelines explain (and illustrate with :polite + examples) that we opt for a nonliteral reading if there is a clear pragmatics?

@nschneid nschneid changed the title Conversational implicatures Conversational implicatures/pragmatics May 25, 2016
@nschneid
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nschneid commented Feb 3, 2017

Encountered this again. It seems that "Why not ...?" is a common formula for recommendations.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant