Updates from Overleaf

paper.tex

@@ -505,13 +505,12 @@ \subsection{Methodology}\label{sec:methodology}
 %
 The resulting OWL 2 ontology was generated using SMOG~\citep{smog} and validated by the HermiT~\citep{hermit} and Pellet~\citep{pellet} reasoners and SHACL shapes, see \cref{sec:annods}.
 In both cases, the consistency of the ontology was proven.
-As a use case, we integrated the ontology into the \aw{} software~\citep{aw3d} and were able to successfully realise all three intended use cases.
+Regarding use cases, we integrated the ontology into the \aw{} software~\citep{aw3d} and were able to successfully realise all three intended use cases.
 Thereby, 14 of the core categories%
 \footnote{Anatomical line, Anatomical point, Anatomical structure, Bone, Bone compound, Bone part, Measurement point, Orientation point, Phenotype, Spatial anatomical entity, Tooth, Tooth part, Phenotype and Relative anatomical location.}
 and 4 of the relation types%
 \footnote{hasPart, boundaryOf, locationOf and derivedFrom.}
 of ANNOdc were utilised and their subcategories and specific relations were dynamically queried (according to the three-ontology method).
-%
 Statistical information about the ontology is shown in \cref{tab:stats}.
 
 \begin{table}[b]