Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
count and expand AW3d related core categories
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
KonradHoeffner committed Jul 8, 2024
1 parent fe39390 commit ae6993a
Showing 1 changed file with 8 additions and 6 deletions.
14 changes: 8 additions & 6 deletions paper.tex
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -502,15 +502,17 @@ \subsection{Methodology}\label{sec:methodology}
%
Finally, a spreadsheet template was developed for domain experts to specify domain-specific entities (ANNOds), strictly compliant with ANNOdc, see \cref{sec:annodc}.
This means that the domain experts had to insert more specific categories (single categories or category trees) under defined ANNOdc core categories and to describe them by suitable annotations and relations introduced in ANNOdc.

%
The resulting OWL 2 ontology was generated using SMOG~\citep{smog} and validated by the HermiT~\citep{hermit} and Pellet~\citep{pellet} reasoners and SHACL shapes, see \cref{sec:annods}.
In both cases, the consistency of the ontology was proven.
As a use case, we integrated the ontology into the \aw{} software~\citep{aw3d} and were able to successfully realise all three intended use cases.
Thereby, most of the core categories,
such as \enquote{Bone}, \enquote{Bone part}, \enquote{Bone compound}, \enquote{Tooth}, \enquote{Tooth part}, \enquote{Phenotype}, \enquote{Relative anatomical location}, \enquote{Anatomical line} and \enquote{Anatomical point}),
and relation types (such as hasPart, boundaryOf, locationOf and derivedFrom) of ANNOdc were utilised and their subcategories and specific relations were dynamically queried (according to the three-ontology method).

The statistical information on the ANNO ontology is shown in \cref{tab:stats}.
Thereby, 14 of the core categories%
\footnote{Anatomical line, Anatomical point, Anatomical structure, Bone, Bone compound, Bone part, Measurement point, Orientation point, Phenotype, Spatial anatomical entity, Tooth, Tooth part, Phenotype and Relative anatomical location.}
and 4 of the relation types%
\footnote{hasPart, boundaryOf, locationOf and derivedFrom.}
of ANNOdc were utilised and their subcategories and specific relations were dynamically queried (according to the three-ontology method).
%
Statistical information about the ontology is shown in \cref{tab:stats}.

\begin{table}[b]
\centering
Expand Down

0 comments on commit ae6993a

Please sign in to comment.