-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 818
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Replace lexical #4774
Comments
Marking this help wanted and good first issue as it should be fairly straightforward to make the changes and check the benchmarks for performance regressions. Marking this as a feature request not a bug as AFAICT we do not use any of the impacted methods. |
Re-reading the advisory it appears to be for lexical, not lexical-core? Additionally I'm not seeing any soundness issues reported against lexical-core? Moving away from lexical-core would entail some non-trivial performance regressions, given this I'm somewhat inclined to not pursue this at this time... |
Given this regresses performance, and the advisory is for lexical not lexical-core, I am closing this for now. Feel free to reopen if I am mistaken |
|
Describe the bug
There are recent advisories for lexical, mainly for soundness and being unmaintained.
https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2023-0055.html
GHSA-c2hm-mjxv-89r4
Expected behavior
lexical replaced with alternative techniques/crates.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: