You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As part of #8789, @kmitchener ran the ClickBench results using DataFusion 34.0.0 and compared to DataFusion 33.0.0 they appear to go slightly slower.
I would like to know why the benchmark shows it going slightly slower
To Reproduce
He ran the v33 benchmarks on the same instance and modified the benchmark so it will display both 33 and 34 at the same time so you can compare the runs:
Describe the bug
As part of #8789, @kmitchener ran the ClickBench results using DataFusion 34.0.0 and compared to DataFusion 33.0.0 they appear to go slightly slower.
I would like to know why the benchmark shows it going slightly slower
To Reproduce
He ran the v33 benchmarks on the same instance and modified the benchmark so it will display both 33 and 34 at the same time so you can compare the runs:
![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/692497/295343195-130a7257-806a-4156-ba91-0a944c1467a6.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJnaXRodWIuY29tIiwiYXVkIjoicmF3LmdpdGh1YnVzZXJjb250ZW50LmNvbSIsImtleSI6ImtleTUiLCJleHAiOjE3MzkyMDUwNTAsIm5iZiI6MTczOTIwNDc1MCwicGF0aCI6Ii82OTI0OTcvMjk1MzQzMTk1LTEzMGE3MjU3LTgwNmEtNDE1Ni1iYTkxLTBhOTQ0YzE0NjdhNi5wbmc_WC1BbXotQWxnb3JpdGhtPUFXUzQtSE1BQy1TSEEyNTYmWC1BbXotQ3JlZGVudGlhbD1BS0lBVkNPRFlMU0E1M1BRSzRaQSUyRjIwMjUwMjEwJTJGdXMtZWFzdC0xJTJGczMlMkZhd3M0X3JlcXVlc3QmWC1BbXotRGF0ZT0yMDI1MDIxMFQxNjI1NTBaJlgtQW16LUV4cGlyZXM9MzAwJlgtQW16LVNpZ25hdHVyZT00ZmM1MzY0MjUzNjYwMWNjYWYyNGU1NjEyMDNmOTUxYmVkYmVlMjYyN2Y1NWExN2RmNDdkMjA1YTU0Zjk3MWI5JlgtQW16LVNpZ25lZEhlYWRlcnM9aG9zdCJ9.WAtG_kP1b0pEn7aMXaLXwwNrCkEIympEXKZKS8Q1kZM)
You can grab that from -> https://github.com/kmitchener/ClickBench/blob/new-run-of-datafusion-33/index.html
Expected behavior
Each release should be as good or better than the last
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: