-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 157
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: #339
Comments
Please add steps to reproduce. Did you run the Flight Crew Scheduling example without any source code modifications? Which data set did you use? |
Thank you for your reply so soon.I ran the Flight Crew Scheduling example without any source code modifications.But I use a data set constructed by myself,it is a day scheduling,I think it should work.This is my dataset below.It said there is something wrong with A007 LSS TO FU, something like bi-directional relationship,but it can't be LSS TO FU in real situation.How can I change my dataset or the source code? |
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: The entity (AB007@2018-01-01-0) has a variable (employee) with value (Chad Q. Green) which has a sourceVariableName variable (flightAssignmentSet) with a value ([AB001@2018-01-01-0, AB005@2018-01-01-0, AB008@2018-01-01-0, AB009@2018-01-01-0]) which already contained the entity (AB007@2018-01-01-0). What does this mean? |
Thanks for the report. I've finally found the time to analyze this. It's caused by a bug in the Flight Scheduling example code. I'll file a Jira ticket describing the bug and we'll fix it soon. |
Thank you very much.It helps me a lot. |
When I construct a flight crew scheduling problem ,it caused such problem:
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: The entity (AB071@2018-01-01-0) has a variable (employee) with value (Chad Q. Green) which has a sourceVariableName variable (flightAssignmentSet) with a value ([AB003@2018-01-01-0, AB019@2018-01-01-0, AB047@2018-01-01-0, AB070@2018-01-01-0]) which already contained the entity (AB071@2018-01-01-0).
Verify the consistency of your input problem for that bi-directional relationship.
How to handle this problem?Hope for your answer.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: