feat: use uv in CI #31260
Merged
feat: use uv in CI #31260
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
github_actions
mistercrunch
requested review from
villebro,
geido,
eschutho,
rusackas,
betodealmeida,
nytai,
craig-rueda,
john-bodley,
kgabryje and
dpgaspar
as code owners
eschutho
approved these changes
Dec 3, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Trying uv in CI context, next step is to use in Docker as well
Checked 2 data points only, but seems to be accelerating the python-setup backend by about 30 seconds. From ~70 to ~30 seconds.
Another data point check here on the docker dev image build, looks like we save ~10 minutes or so