page content alignment across all dashboard pages #1493
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces various modifications primarily focused on CSS styling and layout adjustments across multiple components. Key changes include the removal of specific padding and margin properties, updates to background colors, and the restructuring of HTML elements to enhance readability. Additionally, new components such as Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Deploying irenestaging with
|
| Latest commit: |
1f4ff53
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://be1103d3.irenestaging.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://pd-1581-unify-page-content-a.irenestaging.pages.dev |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 13
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (26)
app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/static-scan.hbs (1)
3-3: Consider adding backgroundColor='inherit' for consistency.Other dashboard templates mentioned in the summary use PageWrapper with backgroundColor='inherit'. Consider adding this prop here as well to maintain visual consistency across all dashboard pages.
-<PageWrapper> +<PageWrapper @backgroundColor="inherit">app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/project/files.hbs (1)
3-3: Consider adding@backgroundColor="inherit"for consistency.Other templates in the dashboard use
<PageWrapper @backgroundColor="inherit">. Adding this property here would maintain visual consistency across all dashboard pages.-<PageWrapper> +<PageWrapper @backgroundColor="inherit">app/components/page-wrapper/index.hbs (1)
1-5: LGTM! Consider adding component documentation.The component structure is clean and follows good practices for component composition. It provides a consistent wrapper for page content alignment across dashboard pages.
Consider adding a comment block above the template to document:
- The component's purpose
- Available arguments (@backgroundColor)
- Usage examples
app/templates/authenticated/security/files.hbs (1)
4-7: Verify proper indentation of template parameters.The indentation of @projectid and @queryParams parameters appears inconsistent with the component declaration.
Apply this formatting improvement:
<Security::FileSearchList - @projectId={{@model.projectid}} - @queryParams={{@model.queryParams}} + @projectId={{@model.projectid}} + @queryParams={{@model.queryParams}} />app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/dynamic-scan.hbs (1)
3-3: Consider adding backgroundColor prop for consistency.Other instances of PageWrapper mentioned in the summary use a backgroundColor prop. Consider adding it here for consistency.
-<PageWrapper> +<PageWrapper @backgroundColor="inherit">app/components/public-api-docs/index.scss (1)
3-3: LGTM! Consistent with container standardization pattern.The removal of horizontal padding while maintaining max-width and centered alignment aligns well with the standardization effort across dashboard pages.
Consider documenting these container layout standards in a shared style guide to maintain consistency as new components are added.
app/components/page-wrapper/index.ts (2)
3-10: Consider adding JSDoc documentation for the interfaceThe
PageWrapperSignatureinterface defines the component's contract, but lacks documentation explaining its purpose and usage. This would be particularly helpful for other developers implementing dashboard pages.+/** + * Interface for the PageWrapper component that provides consistent layout across dashboard pages + * @interface PageWrapperSignature + * @property {Object} Args - Component arguments + * @property {('dark'|'inherit')} [Args.backgroundColor] - Controls the background color of the wrapper + * @property {Object} Blocks - Component blocks + * @property {Array} Blocks.default - Default content block + */ interface PageWrapperSignature { Args: { backgroundColor?: 'dark' | 'inherit'; }; Blocks: { default: []; }; }
1-18: Consider enhancing the component's flexibilitySince this component is being used across all dashboard pages for content alignment, consider adding more layout-related props to make it more versatile.
Consider extending the interface with common layout properties:
interface PageWrapperSignature { Args: { backgroundColor?: 'dark' | 'inherit'; padding?: 'none' | 'small' | 'medium' | 'large'; maxWidth?: 'default' | 'narrow' | 'wide'; centerContent?: boolean; }; Blocks: { default: []; }; }This would provide more control over the layout while maintaining consistency across dashboard pages.
app/components/organization/settings-wrapper/index.scss (1)
14-17: Consider using CSS custom property for magic numbersThe padding and top values (1.5em, -0.5em) appear to be related to layout calculations. Consider extracting these to CSS custom properties for better maintainability.
.organization-settings-root { + --settings-vertical-offset: -0.5em; + --settings-padding: 1.5em; .organization-settings-breadcrumbs-container { - padding: 1.5em 0; - top: -0.5em; + padding: var(--settings-padding) 0; + top: var(--settings-vertical-offset); } }app/components/file-details/index.hbs (3)
2-14: Consider standardizing spacing classes across dashboard pages.Instead of using arbitrary margin classes (
mt-2 mb-3), consider using consistent spacing values defined at the design system level for better maintainability across dashboard pages.<AkBreadcrumbs::Container - class='mt-2 mb-3' + class='ak-spacing-standard' data-test-fileDetails-breadcrumbContainer >
16-22: Standardize stack spacing values across dashboard pages.The stack spacing value of '2.5' might not be consistent with other dashboard pages. Consider using a standardized spacing scale from your design system.
-<AkStack @direction='column' @spacing='2.5'> +<AkStack @direction='column' @spacing={{this.standardSpacing}}>
24-24: Ensure consistent spacing with vulnerability analysis component.The
VulnerabilityAnalysiscomponent lacks explicit spacing classes. Consider wrapping it in the AkStack or adding consistent spacing classes to maintain alignment with other sections.+<AkStack @direction='column' @spacing={{this.standardSpacing}}> <FileDetails::VulnerabilityAnalysis @file={{@file}} /> +</AkStack>app/components/file-details/api-scan/index.scss (1)
4-4: Simplify the padding value.The
0emcan be simplified to just0as zero has no unit.- padding: 0 0em 1.5em; + padding: 0 0 1.5em;app/components/file-details/manual-scan/index.scss (1)
Fix required: Replace removed $container-width variable in manual scan footer
The
$container-widthvariable is indeed not defined anywhere in the codebase, confirming it has been removed. The footer styles inapp/components/file-details/manual-scan/index.scssneed to be updated to use a different width calculation approach.Consider one of these approaches:
.manual-scan-footer { width: 100%; - max-width: $container-width + 50px; + max-width: calc(100% - 2rem); // For responsive width // OR + max-width: 1200px; // If you want a fixed width margin: 0 auto; padding: 1em;🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
28-41: Fix: Replace removed $container-width variable in footer stylesThe footer styles reference the removed
$container-widthvariable, which will cause compilation errors. This needs immediate attention.Consider one of these approaches:
.manual-scan-footer { - max-width: $container-width + 50px; + max-width: 1200px; // If this was the previous container width // OR + max-width: min(calc(100% - 2rem), 1200px); // For responsive width🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for other usages of the removed variable rg -t scss "\$container-width"Length of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Try searching with ripgrep without file type filter since scss is not recognized rg "\$container-width" # Also search for any scss/sass files to understand the file structure fd "\.(scss|sass)$"Length of output: 19471
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for container-width variable definition in style files rg "\$container-width:" app/styles/ rg "\$container-width:" app/components/ # Check for any imports in the manual-scan scss file that might import the variable cat "app/components/file-details/manual-scan/index.scss"Length of output: 1140
app/components/security/project-search-list/header/index.hbs (1)
Width constraints missing for search input container
The
search-input-container-widthclass is used in the template but is not defined in the corresponding SCSS file. This could lead to uncontrolled width scaling issues since the parent container is set to full width.
- Add width constraints for
.search-input-container-widthinapp/components/security/project-search-list/header/index.scss- Consider using properties like
max-widthorwidthto maintain visual balance- Ensure the width constraints align with the existing
min-width: 600pxof the header container🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
24-24: Verify search input container width scaling.The search input container uses a local class for width control. With the parent container now being full-width, ensure the
search-input-container-widthclass maintains appropriate width constraints for optimal visual balance.
Let me check the CSS module to verify the width constraints.
Let me check the specific CSS class definition in the SCSS file.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the CSS implementation for search input container # Expected: Should find width constraints in corresponding CSS module # Search for the search input container width class rg "search-input-container-width" app/components/security/project-search-list/header/Length of output: 197
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for CSS module files in the header directory fd ".*\.css$|.*\.scss$" app/components/security/project-search-list/header/ # If found, check their content for width-related styles rg -A 3 "search-input-container-width|width" app/components/security/project-search-list/header/Length of output: 1443
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the content of the SCSS file to find the search-input-container-width class cat app/components/security/project-search-list/header/index.scssLength of output: 363
app/components/security/analysis-details/index.hbs (1)
Line range hint
19-25: Consider extracting repeated section wrapper into a componentThere's a repeated pattern of
AkStackwith identical configuration across multiple sections. This could be extracted into a reusable component to reduce duplication and improve maintainability.Consider creating a new component like this:
Then use it like this:
-<AkStack - @direction='column' - @width='full' - local-class='analysis-details-section-wrapper' - class='p-2 my-2' -> +<Security::AnalysisDetails::SectionWrapper> <Security::AnalysisDetails::CvssMetrics @analysis={{this.analysisDetails}} @updateCVSSScore={{this.triggerUpdateCVSSScore}} @isInValidCvssBase={{this.isInValidCvssBase}} /> -</AkStack> +</Security::AnalysisDetails::SectionWrapper>Also applies to: 29-35, 39-45, 49-55
app/components/file-compare/header/index.scss (1)
7-8: LGTM! Good use of CSS variables for consistent styling.The changes align well with the PR's objective of standardizing page content alignment. The use of CSS variables (
--file-compare-background-light) promotes maintainability and consistency across the application.Consider documenting these CSS variables in a central style guide to ensure consistent usage across the team.
app/components/organization-details/index.ts (1)
17-17: Consider additional null safety forget()call.While the optional chaining operator prevents errors when
this.me.orgis undefined, theget()call might still be unsafe if it returns undefined.Consider this safer approach:
-return this.me.org?.get('is_admin'); +return this.me.org?.get('is_admin') ?? false;app/components/file-compare/vulnerability-details/index.hbs (1)
76-76: Consider padding instead of margin for consistent spacingSwitching from
paddingToptomarginTopmight lead to unexpected spacing due to margin collapsing, especially when this component is used in different contexts or when multiple instances are stacked.Consider using padding to maintain consistent spacing:
- {{style marginTop='1.4286em'}} + {{style paddingTop='1.4286em'}}app/components/sbom/scan-details/index.hbs (2)
Line range hint
16-29: Consider removing or implementing the commented search functionalityThere's a commented-out search input section that might be needed for future implementation. If this feature is planned, consider creating a tracking issue; if not, consider removing the commented code to improve maintainability.
Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track the implementation of the search functionality?
Line range hint
91-138: Enhance accessibility for status messagesWhile the status display section includes proper data-test attributes, consider adding ARIA attributes to improve accessibility for screen readers, especially for the status messages and SVG icons.
Apply these changes to enhance accessibility:
<AkStack @direction='column' @justifyContent='center' @alignItems='center' class='mt-7' + role="status" + aria-live="polite" > {{#if this.scanStatusFailed}} - <AkSvg::NoResult data-test-sbomScanDetails-scanStatusFailedSvg /> + <AkSvg::NoResult + data-test-sbomScanDetails-scanStatusFailedSvg + aria-hidden="true" + /> {{else}} - <AkSvg::InProgress data-test-sbomScanDetails-scanStatusInProgressSvg /> + <AkSvg::InProgress + data-test-sbomScanDetails-scanStatusInProgressSvg + aria-hidden="true" + /> {{/if}}app/components/app-monitoring/settings/index.hbs (2)
Line range hint
1-120: Consider standardizing width handling across sectionsThe template uses a mix of width handling approaches:
@width='full'on parent AkStackwidth='auto'inline style on platform select- Local class for search input width (
search-input-container-width)This mixed approach might lead to inconsistent alignments across different viewport sizes.
Consider standardizing the width handling by:
- Using AkStack's built-in width properties consistently
- Moving width controls from local CSS to component properties where possible
- Ensuring responsive behavior is consistent with other dashboard pages
Line range hint
1-120: Enhance accessibility with proper spacing between interactive elementsWhile the layout changes improve visual alignment, consider the following accessibility enhancements:
- Ensure sufficient touch target spacing between interactive elements (filter, clear button, search)
- Verify that the new spacing maintains a clear visual hierarchy for screen readers
Consider adding ARIA labels to improve navigation:
<AkStack @width='full' @justifyContent='space-between' @alignItems='center' @spacing='1.5' + aria-label={{t 'appMonitoringHeaderSection'}} local-class='header-app-moitoring-page-title' >app/components/file-details/static-scan/index.hbs (2)
19-24: Consider simplifying nested stack componentsThe nested
AkStackcomponents could potentially be simplified to reduce DOM complexity while maintaining the same layout.Consider merging the outer and inner stacks if possible:
- <AkStack @direction='column' local-class='sast-results-sticky-header'> - <AkStack - local-class='sast-results-header' - @width='full' - @justifyContent='space-between' - > + <AkStack + @direction='column' + local-class='sast-results-sticky-header sast-results-header' + @width='full' + @justifyContent='space-between' + >
56-69: Replace arbitrary padding with design system spacingThe
px-1class on the button appears to be an arbitrary padding value. Consider using the design system's spacing utilities for consistency.- class='px-1' + @spacing='medium'app/components/file-details/skeleton-loader/index.hbs (1)
1-34: Consider extracting common padding patterns into named classesThe
p-3class is used repeatedly throughout the template. Consider creating a named class in your CSS module for this common padding pattern to improve maintainability.+ {{!-- Add to your CSS module --}} + .section-padding { + padding: 0.75rem; /* equivalent to p-3 */ + } - <div class='p-3'> + <div local-class='section-padding'>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (82)
app/components/app-monitoring/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/app-monitoring/settings/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-compare/compare-list/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/file-compare/empty/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-compare/header/index.scss(2 hunks)app/components/file-compare/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-compare/loader/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-compare/table/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-compare/table/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-compare/vulnerability-details/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/api-scan/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/api-scan/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/header/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/page-wrapper/index.hbs(0 hunks)app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/page-wrapper/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/page-wrapper/index.ts(0 hunks)app/components/file-details/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/manual-scan/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/manual-scan/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/skeleton-loader/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/skeleton-loader/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/file-details/static-scan/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/static-scan/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-list/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/organization-details/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/organization-details/index.ts(3 hunks)app/components/organization/settings-wrapper/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/organization/settings-wrapper/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/page-wrapper/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/page-wrapper/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/page-wrapper/index.ts(1 hunks)app/components/project-list/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/project-settings/analysis-settings/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/project-settings/page-wrapper/index.hbs(0 hunks)app/components/project-settings/page-wrapper/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/public-api-docs/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/sbom/app-list/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/sbom/app-scan/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/sbom/component-details/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/sbom/scan-details/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/security/analysis-details/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/security/analysis-details/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/security/file-details/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/security/file-search-list/header/index.hbs(2 hunks)app/components/security/file-search-list/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/security/project-search-list/header/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/security/project-search-list/index.hbs(0 hunks)app/styles/_component-variables.scss(3 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/account-settings.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/analytics.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/app-monitoring/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/app-monitoring/monitoring-details.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/billing.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/choose-loading.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/choose.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/compare.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file-vul-compare.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/api-scan.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/dynamic-scan.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/index-loading.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/manual-scan.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/static-scan.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization-settings.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization/namespaces.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization/teams.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization/users.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/project/files.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/project/settings.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/projects.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/public-api/docs.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/sbom.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/sbom/app-scans.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/sbom/component-details.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/sbom/scan-details.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/security/analysis.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/security/downloadapp.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/security/file.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/security/files.hbs(1 hunks)
⛔ Files not processed due to max files limit (2)
- app/templates/authenticated/security/projects.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/security/purgeanalysis.hbs
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (10)
- app/components/file-compare/compare-list/index.scss
- app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/header/index.scss
- app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/page-wrapper/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/page-wrapper/index.scss
- app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/page-wrapper/index.ts
- app/components/file-details/skeleton-loader/index.scss
- app/components/file-list/index.scss
- app/components/project-settings/page-wrapper/index.hbs
- app/components/project-settings/page-wrapper/index.scss
- app/components/security/project-search-list/index.hbs
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (23)
- app/components/app-monitoring/index.scss
- app/components/file-compare/empty/index.scss
- app/components/file-compare/index.hbs
- app/components/file-compare/loader/index.scss
- app/components/file-compare/table/index.hbs
- app/components/file-compare/table/index.scss
- app/components/file-details/api-scan/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/index.scss
- app/components/organization-details/index.scss
- app/components/organization/settings-wrapper/index.hbs
- app/components/page-wrapper/index.scss
- app/components/project-list/index.scss
- app/components/project-settings/analysis-settings/index.scss
- app/components/sbom/app-list/index.scss
- app/components/security/analysis-details/index.scss
- app/components/security/file-details/index.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/choose-loading.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/choose.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file-vul-compare.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization/namespaces.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization/teams.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization/users.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/sbom/component-details.hbs
🔇 Additional comments (74)
app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/index.hbs (2)
1-3: LGTM! Clean implementation of consistent page layout.
The introduction of PageWrapper aligns well with the PR's objective of standardizing content alignment across dashboard pages. The component hierarchy is clear and the data flow remains unchanged.
1-1: Verify consistent PageWrapper implementation.
Let's verify that the PageWrapper component is implemented consistently across other dashboard pages to ensure uniform content alignment.
✅ Verification successful
PageWrapper implementation is consistent across dashboard pages
The verification shows that PageWrapper is consistently implemented across all dashboard pages with proper content wrapping. Some pages use @backgroundColor='inherit' where specific styling is needed, while others use the default styling, which is a valid pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check PageWrapper usage across dashboard templates
# Expected: Consistent usage of PageWrapper in dashboard templates
# Search for PageWrapper usage in dashboard templates
rg -l "PageWrapper" "app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/"
# Show implementation context
rg -A 3 "<PageWrapper" "app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/"
Length of output: 7929
app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/project/settings.hbs (2)
3-5: LGTM! Verify project-specific styling preservation.
The change to use the generic <PageWrapper> aligns with the goal of standardizing page content alignment across dashboard pages.
Let's verify that project settings specific styling is preserved:
✅ Verification successful
PageWrapper migration is consistent and safe
The verification shows:
- PageWrapper is consistently used across all dashboard pages (21 templates)
- No specific ProjectSettings::PageWrapper styles were found in the codebase
- The change aligns with the standardization of page layouts
This suggests the migration to the generic PageWrapper is safe and maintains consistency across the dashboard.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any project settings specific styles that might need migration
rg -g '*.{css,scss}' -l 'ProjectSettings::PageWrapper'
# Verify consistent PageWrapper usage across dashboard templates
fd . app/templates/authenticated/dashboard -e hbs -x grep -l "PageWrapper"
Length of output: 1382
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any specific styling related to ProjectSettings::PageWrapper
rg -g '*.{css,scss,less}' 'ProjectSettings'
# Let's also check the PageWrapper component implementation to understand its styling
ast-grep --pattern 'class PageWrapper extends Component {
$$$
}'
# Check for any specific styling classes or attributes in the old template
rg -g '*.hbs' -B2 -A2 'ProjectSettings::PageWrapper'
Length of output: 165
3-5: Verify consistent wrapper usage across dashboard pages.
Since this change is part of standardizing page content alignment, ensure other dashboard pages follow the same pattern.
✅ Verification successful
PageWrapper is consistently used across dashboard pages
Based on the search results, the PageWrapper component is consistently used across the dashboard templates. The component is present in all major dashboard sections including:
- Project views (settings, files)
- File details views (static-scan, manual-scan, api-scan, etc.)
- Organization views (settings, analytics)
- App monitoring views
- Public API documentation
- SBOM views
The wrapper is appropriately used with {{outlet}} or specific content components, and some instances properly utilize the @backgroundColor parameter where needed for visual consistency.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining specific page wrappers in dashboard templates
fd . app/templates/authenticated/dashboard -e hbs -x grep -l "::PageWrapper"
# Verify PageWrapper component structure
ast-grep --pattern 'PageWrapper>
{{outlet}}
</PageWrapper>'
Length of output: 140
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for PageWrapper usage in dashboard templates
rg -l "PageWrapper" app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/
# Show content of dashboard templates to analyze wrapper patterns
fd . app/templates/authenticated/dashboard -e hbs -x cat {}
Length of output: 11169
app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/public-api/docs.hbs (1)
3-5: LGTM! Consistent with dashboard layout standardization.
The addition of PageWrapper aligns with the PR's objective of standardizing page content alignment across dashboard pages.
Let's verify this pattern is consistently applied across other dashboard pages:
✅ Verification successful
PageWrapper usage is consistently applied across dashboard pages
The verification confirms that PageWrapper is consistently used across all dashboard pages, including:
- Core dashboard pages (projects, organization, billing, analytics)
- Project-specific pages (files, settings)
- File-related pages (static-scan, manual-scan, api-scan)
- App monitoring pages
- And the public-api docs page in question
This implementation maintains layout consistency throughout the dashboard interface.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if PageWrapper is consistently used across dashboard templates
# Expected: Find PageWrapper usage in other dashboard template files
# Search for PageWrapper usage in dashboard templates
rg -l "PageWrapper" "app/templates/authenticated/dashboard"
# Check the structure to ensure consistent nesting
ast-grep --pattern '<PageWrapper>
$$$
</PageWrapper>'
Length of output: 1368
app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/projects.hbs (1)
3-5: LGTM! The PageWrapper addition aligns with dashboard standardization.
The structural change is consistent with the broader initiative to standardize layout across dashboard pages.
Let's verify the consistent usage of PageWrapper across other dashboard templates:
app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/sbom.hbs (1)
3-5: LGTM! Consistent with dashboard page alignment.
The addition of PageWrapper aligns with the PR's objective of standardizing content layout across dashboard pages. The implementation follows the established pattern with the correct backgroundColor property.
app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/analytics.hbs (2)
3-5: Verify style migration from 'stat-home-page'.
Since we're removing the 'stat-home-page' class, ensure any essential styles have been migrated to PageWrapper or appropriate alternative.
✅ Verification successful
Migration of stat-home-page styles is not a concern
The stat-home-page class was removed in favor of using the PageWrapper component, which provides proper layout styling including padding, max-width constraints, and background color handling. The git history shows this was part of a deliberate change to align page content across dashboard pages, and no specific styles from stat-home-page needed migration as the PageWrapper component already implements the necessary layout patterns.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any existing usage or styles of stat-home-page class
# Search for stat-home-page class usage in styles
rg -t css -t scss "stat-home-page"
# Search for class usage in templates
rg -t hbs "stat-home-page"
Length of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for the class name and check SCSS files directly
rg "stat-home-page" --type-add 'scss:*.scss' -t scss -t css -t hbs
# Also check for any SCSS files in the app directory
fd ".scss$" app/
# Check the specific analytics template's previous versions in git history
git log -p app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/analytics.hbs
Length of output: 20954
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any styles related to stat-home-page in the app styles directory
rg "stat-home-page" app/styles/
# Check if there are any styles in the PageWrapper component
cat app/components/page-wrapper/index.scss
Length of output: 406
3-5: LGTM! Verify PageWrapper component availability.
The change aligns well with the standardization effort across dashboard pages. The consistent use of PageWrapper improves layout consistency.
Let's verify the PageWrapper component is properly defined:
✅ Verification successful
PageWrapper component verified and properly implemented
The component is correctly defined and used:
- Located at
app/components/page-wrapper/index.tswith proper TypeScript types - Accepts
backgroundColorprop with 'dark' | 'inherit' options - Template properly implements the wrapper with CSS modules
- Consistent usage across dashboard templates with
backgroundColor='inherit'
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify PageWrapper component existence and its backgroundColor prop
# Check for PageWrapper component definition
fd -e js -e ts -e hbs PageWrapper
# Check for backgroundColor prop usage
rg -A 5 "PageWrapper.*backgroundColor"
Length of output: 4821
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the PageWrapper component definition and its props
ast-grep --pattern 'class PageWrapper extends $_ {
$$$
}'
# Also check for any potential component definition in template files
fd -e hbs "page-wrapper.hbs"
Length of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different patterns to locate the PageWrapper component
# Check for component definition in JavaScript/TypeScript files
fd -e js -e ts "page-wrapper"
# Look for template-only components
fd -e hbs "page-wrapper"
# Search for any PageWrapper imports or definitions
rg -l "PageWrapper"
# Check for component definition using template syntax
rg "@component" -A 5 "page-wrapper"
Length of output: 1752
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the PageWrapper component implementation
cat app/components/page-wrapper/index.ts
# Check if there's a template file for the component
fd -e hbs -p "components/page-wrapper"
Length of output: 526
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the template implementation
cat app/components/page-wrapper/index.hbs
Length of output: 187
app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/static-scan.hbs (1)
3-5: LGTM! PageWrapper addition aligns with dashboard layout standardization.
The addition of PageWrapper component helps maintain consistent layout across dashboard pages.
app/templates/authenticated/security/downloadapp.hbs (1)
3-5: LGTM! The changes align with the dashboard standardization effort.
The addition of PageWrapper component maintains consistency with other dashboard pages while preserving the existing styling context through @backgroundColor='inherit'.
Let's verify this standardization pattern across other dashboard pages:
✅ Verification successful
The PageWrapper usage is consistent with the dashboard standardization pattern
The search results confirm that PageWrapper is widely used across dashboard templates with the same pattern:
- All security-related templates use
@backgroundColor='inherit' - The component is consistently used to wrap the main content of dashboard pages
- The implementation in
downloadapp.hbsfollows the established pattern seen in other security templates
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent usage of PageWrapper across dashboard templates
# Expected: Similar wrapping pattern with PageWrapper should be present in other dashboard templates
# Search for PageWrapper usage in other dashboard templates
rg -U "PageWrapper.*\n.*@backgroundColor='inherit'" "app/templates"
Length of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for PageWrapper usage patterns
# First, let's find PageWrapper usage in templates
rg -U "PageWrapper" "app/templates" -A 2
# Also search for any backgroundColor usage
rg "backgroundColor" "app/templates"
Length of output: 9414
app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/account-settings.hbs (1)
3-7: LGTM! PageWrapper implementation aligns with dashboard standardization.
The addition of PageWrapper with inherited background color maintains consistency with other dashboard pages while preserving the existing component hierarchy.
app/templates/authenticated/security/file.hbs (1)
3-5: LGTM! Verify styling inheritance across nested components.
The wrapping of Security::FileDetails with PageWrapper aligns with the PR objective of standardizing page content alignment across dashboard pages.
Let's verify the consistency of this pattern across other security-related templates:
✅ Verification successful
PageWrapper usage is consistent across all security templates
The verification shows perfect alignment - all security-related templates (*.hbs) under the security directory consistently use PageWrapper with backgroundColor='inherit'. This confirms that the implementation in file.hbs follows the established pattern across the security section of the dashboard.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of PageWrapper in security templates
# Expected: Similar wrapping pattern with backgroundColor='inherit'
# Search for PageWrapper usage in security-related templates
rg -l "PageWrapper.*backgroundColor.*inherit" "app/templates/authenticated/security/"
# Check for any security templates that might be missing the wrapper
fd ".*\.hbs$" "app/templates/authenticated/security/"
Length of output: 741
app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/project/files.hbs (1)
3-5: LGTM! The structural change aligns with the standardization effort.
The addition of <PageWrapper> component follows the pattern of standardizing layout across dashboard pages.
app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/app-monitoring/index.hbs (2)
3-5: LGTM! Consistent with dashboard standardization effort.
The addition of PageWrapper aligns with the broader initiative to standardize layout across dashboard pages. The use of @backgroundColor='inherit' maintains visual consistency while leveraging PageWrapper's structural benefits.
Let's verify the consistent usage of PageWrapper across other dashboard templates:
✅ Verification successful
PageWrapper implementation verified across dashboard templates ✅
The verification confirms consistent usage of PageWrapper with @backgroundColor='inherit' across multiple dashboard templates, including:
- Account settings
- Analytics
- Billing
- Organization
- SBOM
- App monitoring (both index and details)
- File loading
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent PageWrapper usage across dashboard templates
# Expected: Similar PageWrapper implementation with backgroundColor='inherit'
# Search for PageWrapper usage in dashboard templates
rg -U "PageWrapper.*backgroundColor.*inherit" "app/templates/authenticated/dashboard"
Length of output: 876
1-5: Verify consistent template structure across dashboard.
The template maintains clean nesting and proper component hierarchy. Let's verify this pattern is consistent across other dashboard templates.
✅ Verification successful
Template structure is consistent across dashboard templates
After reviewing the dashboard templates, I can confirm that the structure is consistent. The templates follow a common pattern:
- Using
{{page-title}}at the top - Wrapping content with
<PageWrapper>component - Proper component nesting and indentation
The template under review follows this established pattern correctly.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check template structure consistency
# Expected: Similar nesting pattern with page-title and PageWrapper
# Search for templates with both page-title and PageWrapper
rg -U "(?s){{page-title.*?PageWrapper.*?}}" "app/templates/authenticated/dashboard"
Length of output: 198
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check template structure
# First, let's see what templates exist in the dashboard directory
fd "\.hbs$" "app/templates/authenticated/dashboard"
# Then check the content of these templates
echo "=== Template Contents ==="
fd "\.hbs$" "app/templates/authenticated/dashboard" -x cat {}
Length of output: 13607
app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/index.hbs (2)
1-5: LGTM! Header component implementation is clean and consistent.
The component maintains its proper attributes and formatting.
7-7: Verify content alignment after PageWrapper removal.
The removal of PageWrapper and repositioning of {{yield}} might affect the page's layout consistency with other dashboard pages. Since this PR aims to align content across dashboard pages, we should verify this change maintains consistent spacing and alignment.
Let's check for similar patterns in other dashboard pages:
app/templates/authenticated/security/analysis.hbs (1)
3-5: LGTM! The PageWrapper addition aligns with the standardization effort.
The introduction of PageWrapper with inherited background color maintains visual consistency while preserving the existing styling context. This change appropriately supports the PR's objective of standardizing page content alignment across dashboard pages.
Let's verify the consistent usage of PageWrapper across other dashboard pages:
✅ Verification successful
PageWrapper implementation is consistent across security templates
The verification shows that PageWrapper is consistently implemented across all templates in the security section:
- All 6 templates under
app/templates/authenticated/security/use PageWrapper - They all use the same
@backgroundColor='inherit'property - The component wrapping pattern is uniform across all files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent PageWrapper usage across templates
# Expected: Find similar PageWrapper implementations in other dashboard templates
# Search for PageWrapper usage patterns in template files
rg -U "PageWrapper.*\n.*Analysis" "app/templates"
# Check for any templates that might be missing the PageWrapper
rg -l "Security::Analysis" "app/templates" | xargs rg -L "PageWrapper"
Length of output: 552
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify if there are any other security analysis templates that might need PageWrapper
fd ".*analysis.*\.hbs" app/templates/authenticated/security
# Also check for any other templates in the security folder for consistency
fd "\.hbs$" app/templates/authenticated/security
# Check the pattern of PageWrapper usage in these files
rg -U "PageWrapper.*\n.*" "app/templates/authenticated/security"
Length of output: 1690
app/components/page-wrapper/index.hbs (1)
1-1: Verify the background color implementation.
The dynamic background color class needs corresponding CSS classes defined.
✅ Verification successful
Background color implementation is properly defined
The CSS implementation for the background color is correctly set up in index.scss:
- The
.darkclass is properly defined using SCSS nesting - It uses a CSS variable
--page-wrapper-background-colorfor theming - There's also support for an
inheritbackground color option
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify CSS classes for background colors exist
# Expected: Find CSS module file with corresponding background color classes
# Look for CSS module file
fd -e css -e scss "page-wrapper" app/components
# Search for background color class definitions
rg -A 3 "\.dark\s*{" app/components/page-wrapper/
Length of output: 183
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to find CSS/SCSS files and background color classes
# Find CSS/SCSS files for page-wrapper component
fd -e css -e scss . app/components/page-wrapper/
# Search for background color related classes with fixed regex
rg "\.dark" app/components/page-wrapper/
# Search for any CSS class definitions in the component directory
rg "^\s*\." app/components/page-wrapper/
# Look for style imports in the component
rg "styles" app/components/page-wrapper/
Length of output: 393
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the SCSS file to verify the background color implementation
# Display the content of index.scss to see the dark class implementation
cat app/components/page-wrapper/index.scss
Length of output: 374
app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/api-scan.hbs (1)
3-7: LGTM! The PageWrapper addition aligns with the PR objectives.
The introduction of PageWrapper maintains the existing functionality while contributing to consistent layout structure across dashboard pages.
app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/manual-scan.hbs (2)
3-7: LGTM! Clean implementation of PageWrapper
The addition of PageWrapper maintains the existing functionality while standardizing the page layout structure, which aligns well with the PR's objective of consistent content alignment across dashboard pages.
3-7: Verify consistent PageWrapper usage across dashboard pages
Let's ensure this implementation maintains consistency with other dashboard pages that have been updated with PageWrapper.
✅ Verification successful
PageWrapper usage is consistent with other dashboard pages
The verification shows that the PageWrapper component is consistently used across dashboard pages, including similar scan-related pages like dynamic-scan.hbs, static-scan.hbs, and api-scan.hbs. The files without PageWrapper are primarily nested templates that inherit the wrapper from their parent routes, which is the expected pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check PageWrapper implementation across dashboard templates
# Expected: Similar wrapping pattern across dashboard pages
# Search for PageWrapper usage in dashboard templates
rg -U "PageWrapper[^-]" "app/templates/authenticated/dashboard"
# Check for any dashboard templates that might be missing PageWrapper
fd . "app/templates/authenticated/dashboard" -e hbs -x grep -L "PageWrapper"
Length of output: 5883
app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization-settings.hbs (1)
3-7: Verify consistent PageWrapper implementation across dashboard pages
The addition of PageWrapper aligns with the PR objective of standardizing page content alignment across dashboard pages.
Let's verify the consistent implementation across other dashboard pages:
✅ Verification successful
This will help us see the actual implementation of PageWrapper across dashboard pages and verify if they follow a consistent pattern.
PageWrapper implementation is consistent across dashboard pages
The implementation in organization-settings.hbs follows the established pattern across dashboard pages. Some observations from the verification:
- All dashboard pages consistently use
<PageWrapper>as the outermost component - Some pages like
billing.hbs,analytics.hbs, andaccount-settings.hbsuse@backgroundColor='inherit'prop - The wrapping pattern maintains proper component hierarchy with child components and outlets
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check PageWrapper usage pattern across dashboard templates
# Expected: All dashboard pages should follow similar wrapping pattern
# Search for PageWrapper usage in dashboard templates
rg -l "PageWrapper" "app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/"
# Check if any dashboard templates are missing PageWrapper
fd "\.hbs$" "app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/" --exec grep -L "PageWrapper" {}
Length of output: 3781
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual content of some dashboard templates to verify PageWrapper usage pattern
rg -U "PageWrapper" "app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 10500
app/templates/authenticated/security/files.hbs (1)
3-8: LGTM! The PageWrapper addition aligns with the standardization effort.
The addition of PageWrapper with inherited background color maintains visual consistency while preserving the existing functionality of the FileSearchList component.
Let's verify the consistent usage of PageWrapper across other dashboard pages:
app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/compare.hbs (2)
4-8: LGTM: FileCompare component implementation
The FileCompare component properties are correctly bound to the model and maintain their existing functionality.
10-10: Verify outlet rendering behavior
The placement of {{outlet}} within PageWrapper might affect child route rendering. Ensure this matches the layout pattern used in other dashboard pages.
✅ Verification successful
Outlet placement is consistent with dashboard patterns
The {{outlet}} placement in the compare template follows the established pattern used across other dashboard templates. The codebase shows consistent usage where {{outlet}} is placed within <PageWrapper> components or directly in templates that serve as layout containers. This is the same pattern observed in similar dashboard routes like organization, account-settings, and project settings templates.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for outlet placement patterns in other dashboard templates
fd . "app/templates/authenticated/dashboard" --type f --extension hbs --exec rg -A 2 -B 2 "{{outlet}}"
Length of output: 5176
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for outlet placement patterns in other dashboard templates
# Using single quotes to prevent regex interpretation
fd . "app/templates/authenticated/dashboard" --type f --extension hbs --exec rg -l '\{\{outlet\}\}'
# Get content of files containing outlet for context
fd . "app/templates/authenticated/dashboard" --type f --extension hbs --exec cat {}
Length of output: 10770
app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/billing.hbs (2)
4-9: LGTM: Clean conditional structure maintained
The conditional logic for displaying billing information is well-structured and preserved after the PageWrapper addition. The hierarchy of checks (showBilling → license existence) is logical and clear.
3-11: Verify PageWrapper's impact on billing component layouts
The addition of PageWrapper aligns with the PR's objective of standardizing page content alignment. However, we should ensure this doesn't adversely affect the existing billing components' layout.
✅ Verification successful
The results show that PageWrapper is consistently used across many dashboard templates, including various key pages like organization settings, projects, analytics, etc. This indicates a standardized approach to page layouts. No billing-specific styles were found that might conflict with the PageWrapper.
Let's verify the PageWrapper component's implementation to ensure it properly handles its children:
Let's check the actual implementation of the PageWrapper component and its styles:
PageWrapper implementation is safe for billing components
The PageWrapper component is well-implemented with:
- Standard padding and max-width constraints that won't interfere with billing components
- Proper background handling with 'inherit' option that maintains existing styling
- Consistent usage across all dashboard pages
- No conflicting billing-specific styles
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent PageWrapper usage and potential layout conflicts
# Check if PageWrapper is consistently used across dashboard pages
echo "Checking PageWrapper usage in dashboard templates..."
rg -l "PageWrapper" "app/templates/authenticated/dashboard"
# Look for any custom styling that might conflict with PageWrapper
echo "Checking for potential style conflicts..."
rg -l "\.billing-" "app/styles"
Length of output: 1550
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check PageWrapper component implementation
echo "Checking PageWrapper component implementation..."
fd PageWrapper.hbs --exec cat {}
# Check for any existing layout issues or related bugs
echo "Checking for related issues..."
rg -l "layout|alignment|padding" "app/components/page-wrapper"
Length of output: 316
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the PageWrapper component's styles
echo "Checking PageWrapper styles..."
cat app/components/page-wrapper/index.scss
# Look for the component's template
echo "Checking component template..."
cat app/components/page-wrapper/index.hbs
# Check if there are any specific billing component styles
echo "Checking billing component styles..."
fd -g "*billing*.scss" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 827
app/components/public-api-docs/index.scss (1)
10-10: LGTM! Verify alignment across different viewport widths.
The service account link positioning aligns with the wrapper's edge, maintaining consistency with the new container layout.
Let's verify similar absolute positioning patterns across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! The positioning change is safe and consistent.
The change to right: 0em aligns with the codebase's positioning patterns. The search results show that similar absolute positioning with 0em is used in other components, and there are no conflicting patterns that would cause layout issues. The change maintains consistency with the container's edge alignment approach used throughout the application.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for similar absolute positioning patterns to ensure consistent edge alignment
# Search for absolute positioning with right property
rg -l 'position:\s*absolute.*right:' --type scss
# Search for potential inconsistent right positioning values
rg 'right:\s*\d+\.?\d*em' --type scss -A 1 -B 1
Length of output: 158
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to find SCSS/CSS files and check positioning patterns
# Find all scss/css files
fd '\.(scss|css)$'
# Then search for absolute positioning with right property in those files
fd '\.(scss|css)$' --exec rg -l 'position:\s*absolute.*right:'
# Search for right positioning values
fd '\.(scss|css)$' --exec rg 'right:\s*\d+\.?\d*em' -A 1 -B 1
Length of output: 22838
app/components/page-wrapper/index.ts (1)
14-18: LGTM! Proper type registry declaration
The Glint registry declaration is correctly implemented, ensuring type safety when using the component in templates.
app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/app-monitoring/monitoring-details.hbs (3)
4-9: LGTM! Breadcrumbs implementation follows best practices.
The breadcrumb structure is well-organized with proper internationalization support via the t helper.
11-14: LGTM! Component properties are properly passed.
The AppMonitoring::Details component receives the required model data through appropriate properties.
16-16: LGTM! Outlet placement is correct.
The outlet is properly placed within the PageWrapper, ensuring consistent layout for nested routes.
app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/sbom/app-scans.hbs (1)
3-3: LGTM! Consistent with dashboard alignment initiative.
The removal of horizontal padding aligns with the PR's objective of standardizing content alignment across dashboard pages.
Let's verify the consistency of this change across other dashboard pages:
✅ Verification successful
Removal of horizontal padding is consistent with dashboard alignment
The search results confirm that no other dashboard templates under app/templates/authenticated/dashboard are using the px-3 class, indicating this change is consistent with the broader dashboard alignment initiative. The breadcrumb's padding change aligns with the standardization effort across the application.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining px-3 classes in dashboard templates and components
# that might need similar alignment adjustments
# Search for px-3 class in dashboard templates
echo "Checking for px-3 in dashboard templates..."
rg -l 'class=[\'"].*px-3.*[\'"]\s*>' 'app/templates/authenticated/dashboard'
# Search for px-3 class in related components
echo "Checking for px-3 in related components..."
rg -l 'class=[\'"].*px-3.*[\'"]\s*>' 'app/components/sbom'
Length of output: 184
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to search for px-3 classes
# Using single quotes for the pattern and searching in all template files
echo "Checking for px-3 in dashboard templates..."
rg -l 'px-3' 'app/templates/authenticated/dashboard'
echo -e "\nChecking for px-3 in related components..."
rg -l 'px-3' 'app/components'
echo -e "\nShowing context for any remaining px-3 usage..."
rg -C 2 'px-3' 'app/templates/authenticated/dashboard' 'app/components'
Length of output: 52233
app/components/organization/settings-wrapper/index.scss (2)
19-20: Verify the top offset calculation
The top value of 3.5em seems to be calculated based on other elements' dimensions. Ensure this value remains correct if the breadcrumbs container's height changes.
Consider using CSS calc() to make this relationship explicit:
.organization-settings-tabs-container {
- top: 3.5em;
+ top: calc(var(--settings-padding) * 2 + var(--breadcrumbs-height, 1.5em));
}7-12: Verify z-index value in the context of other sticky elements
The z-index of 100 for sticky containers might conflict with other fixed/sticky elements in the dashboard layout.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the layout hierarchy and sticky positioning to better understand potential z-index conflicts.
Based on the analysis of z-index usage and stacking contexts in the codebase, I can now provide a final response:
Z-index value of 100 is appropriate for the sticky containers
The z-index of 100 is consistent with other sticky navigation elements in the codebase and doesn't conflict with overlapping elements. Here's why:
- All other sticky navigation elements (breadcrumbs, tabs) across different components use z-index: 100
- Lower z-index values (10) are used for less critical sticky elements
- Higher z-index values (999) are reserved for overlay elements like modals and drawers
- The background-color ensures proper layering within the component's stacking context
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other z-index declarations that might conflict
rg -g '*.{scss,css}' 'z-index:\s*(9[0-9]|100|10[1-9]|1[1-9][0-9]|[2-9][0-9]{2}|1000)' --no-heading
Length of output: 890
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for sticky/fixed positioning that might interact with our z-index
rg -g '*.{scss,css}' 'position:\s*(sticky|fixed)' -B1 -A3 --no-heading
# Also check for any parent containers that might create stacking contexts
rg -g '*.{scss,css}' '(position:\s*relative|transform:|will-change:|opacity:|filter:)' -B1 -A1 --no-heading
Length of output: 36500
app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/sbom/scan-details.hbs (1)
3-3: LGTM! Class modification aligns with dashboard standardization.
The removal of horizontal padding (px-3) while retaining vertical padding (pt-2 pb-3) is consistent with the PR's objective of standardizing page content alignment across dashboard pages.
Let's verify this pattern is consistently applied across other dashboard pages:
app/components/file-details/index.hbs (1)
1-1: Verify class naming convention and spacing impact.
The removal of the wrapper div and margin adjustments might affect the component's alignment with other dashboard pages.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now make a definitive assessment. The class naming convention *-root is consistently used across the codebase for root-level container elements, as evidenced by numerous examples like login-root, system-status-root, page-wrapper-root, etc. The file-details-root class follows this established pattern.
Class naming convention is consistent with codebase standards
The root container structure aligns with the project's established patterns for dashboard pages, where components use a consistent -root suffix for their main container classes. The removal of the wrapper maintains consistency with other similar components in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent class naming and spacing patterns across dashboard components
# Look for other root container classes to ensure naming consistency
rg -g '*.hbs' -g '*.scss' 'local-class=.*-root'
# Check for similar container structures in other dashboard components
fd -e hbs -e scss . app/components/ --exec grep -l 'PageWrapper\|container\|root'
Length of output: 28532
app/components/security/file-search-list/header/index.hbs (3)
1-1: LGTM: Breadcrumbs container width adjustment aligns with dashboard standardization
The change to @width='full' for the breadcrumbs container is consistent with the PR's objective of standardizing page content alignment across dashboard pages.
14-14: LGTM: Page title section width adjustment maintains layout consistency
The modification to use @width='full' for the page title section maintains visual consistency with the breadcrumbs container above and aligns with the overall dashboard standardization effort.
Line range hint 1-31: Verify consistent width implementation across related components
The AI summary mentions similar width adjustments in the project search list component. Let's verify this consistency across related components.
✅ Verification successful
Width implementation is consistent across related components
The verification confirms that both file-search-list and project-search-list header components consistently use @width='full' for their main AkStack containers. The implementation is properly aligned across these related components.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent width implementation across related components
# Expected: All related search list headers should use @width='full'
# Search for width attributes in related components
rg -U "AkStack.*?@width=['\"](?!full)" "app/components/security/*-search-list/header/"
# Check the overall structure of related components
ast-grep --pattern $'<AkStack @width={{1}} @alignItems="center">\n $$$\n</AkStack>' "app/components/security/*-search-list/header/"
Length of output: 569
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify width consistency
# First, find all header components in security search lists
fd "index.hbs" "app/components/security" --type f | grep "search-list/header"
# Then check their content for AkStack width implementations
rg --type hbs -U "AkStack.*?@width" "app/components/security"
Length of output: 1939
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's specifically check the project-search-list header component
cat "app/components/security/project-search-list/header/index.hbs"
Length of output: 1323
app/components/sbom/app-scan/index.hbs (2)
Line range hint 1-39: LGTM! Layout structure maintains hierarchy and spacing
The template maintains a clear visual hierarchy using:
- Consistent spacing with
AkStackcomponents - Proper heading levels with
AkTypography - Logical grouping of related elements
1-1: Verify padding consistency across dashboard pages
The change from px-3 to py-1 aligns with the PR objective of standardizing content alignment. However, we should verify this change maintains visual consistency with other dashboard pages.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the padding patterns more specifically by searching for the exact padding classes in question.
Padding changes align with dashboard-wide patterns
The removal of px-3 and addition of py-1 in app/components/sbom/app-scan/index.hbs is consistent with the established patterns across the codebase:
- Other SBOM components like scan-details and component-details also use
py-1for vertical spacing - File details components show a similar pattern where action-related components use
py-1withpx-2for compact layouts - The
px-3class is primarily retained in drawer components and form sections where more horizontal space is needed
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent padding classes across dashboard templates
# Expected: Should find similar padding patterns in other dashboard pages
# Search for padding classes in dashboard templates
rg -l 'class=.*p[xy]-[1-3]' app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/
rg -l 'class=.*p[xy]-[1-3]' app/components/*/
Length of output: 8704
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for specific padding classes (px-3 and py-1) in dashboard and SBOM components
rg 'class=.*px-3' app/components/sbom/
rg 'class=.*py-1' app/components/sbom/
# Also check other dashboard components for context
rg 'class=.*px-3' app/components/file-details/
rg 'class=.*py-1' app/components/file-details/
Length of output: 5084
app/components/file-details/static-scan/index.scss (2)
2-2: Verify padding consistency across dashboard pages
The removal of horizontal padding aligns with the PR objective of standardizing page content alignment. However, let's verify this pattern is consistently applied across other dashboard pages.
✅ Verification successful
The search results show that the page-wrapper component (app/components/page-wrapper/index.scss) still uses horizontal padding of 1.5em, while our file under review (app/components/file-details/static-scan/index.scss) has removed it. Let me verify if this is intentional by checking for any recent changes to the page-wrapper component.
Padding changes are correct and aligned with the new page layout structure
The removal of horizontal padding in static-scan/index.scss is intentional and correct. The page-wrapper component (newly added) now handles the consistent horizontal padding (1.5em) at a higher level, eliminating the need for individual components to manage their own horizontal spacing. This change promotes better layout consistency across dashboard pages.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent padding patterns across dashboard components
# Expected: Similar padding changes in other dashboard components
# Search for any remaining horizontal padding in dashboard components
rg -g '*.scss' 'padding:.*[0-9.]+em.*[0-9.]+em' app/components/
Length of output: 8764
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check git history of page-wrapper component to understand padding changes
git log -p app/components/page-wrapper/index.scss
Length of output: 808
Line range hint 1-46: Verify migration to PageWrapper component
The removal of .sast-page-container suggests this component is now wrapped by PageWrapper. Let's verify this migration was properly implemented in the corresponding template file.
app/components/file-details/api-scan/index.scss (2)
8-20: Well-structured CSS organization!
The restructuring of the breadcrumbs and tabs containers improves maintainability by:
- Grouping common styles (position, z-index, background)
- Separating specific styles for each container
- Maintaining proper vertical spacing with coordinated values
3-21: Verify layout consistency with other dashboard pages.
Since this PR aims to align page content across dashboard pages, let's verify that similar padding and container changes have been made consistently.
✅ Verification successful
Layout changes are consistent with dashboard patterns
The changes to remove horizontal padding and use sticky positioning for navigation elements in api-scan are consistent with established patterns across the dashboard:
- The
min-height: calc(100vh - 56px)calculation is a common pattern used in multiple dashboard components likepage-wrapper,organization/settings-wrapper, and other file detail views - Sticky positioning for navigation/header elements is consistently used across the application, as seen in multiple components like
project-settings/header,file-compare/header, and other scan views - Background color variables are properly used following the design system, with
--file-details-api-scan-background-colormatching other component background implementations
The layout changes align with the broader dashboard design patterns and maintain consistency.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent padding and container patterns across dashboard pages
# Search for similar padding patterns in other SCSS files
echo "Checking padding patterns in other dashboard components:"
rg -l "padding:\s*0\s+0" "app/components/**/*.scss"
# Look for container class removal patterns
echo "\nChecking for container classes in other components:"
rg -l "container\s*{" "app/components/**/*.scss"
Length of output: 499
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent padding and container patterns across dashboard pages
# Search for similar padding patterns in other SCSS files
echo "Checking padding patterns in other dashboard components:"
rg -l "padding: 0" app/
# Look for container classes in other components
echo -e "\nChecking for container classes in other components:"
rg -l "container" --type scss app/
# Check specific styles in other dashboard components
echo -e "\nChecking specific styles in dashboard components:"
rg "background-color: var\(--.*\)" --type scss app/
Length of output: 7714
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search more specifically for similar dashboard layouts
# Check for similar sticky header/navigation patterns
echo "Checking sticky header/navigation patterns:"
rg "position:\s*sticky" app/
# Check for similar min-height calculations
echo -e "\nChecking min-height calculations:"
rg "min-height:\s*calc" app/
# Check for similar background-color variable usage
echo -e "\nChecking background-color variables:"
rg "background-color:\s*var" app/
Length of output: 57393
app/components/file-details/manual-scan/index.scss (2)
13-18: LGTM! Clean and well-structured container styles
The padding and positioning values for breadcrumbs and tabs containers are well-chosen and maintain good visual hierarchy.
2-2: Verify horizontal spacing with PageWrapper
The removal of horizontal padding (1.5em → 0em) might affect content spacing. Ensure the PageWrapper or parent component provides adequate horizontal margins to prevent content from touching screen edges.
✅ Verification successful
Horizontal spacing is properly handled by parent components
The removal of horizontal padding (0em) in manual-scan component is safe because:
- The page-wrapper component provides consistent horizontal padding of 1.5em across all pages
- The file-details parent component adds additional padding of 0.5em
- The manual scan component's background color is properly contained within these padded areas
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if PageWrapper or parent components provide horizontal spacing
rg -t scss "padding|margin" --glob "app/components/**/page-wrapper/*.scss"
Length of output: 105
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for page wrapper styles and layout patterns
# First, find all scss files that might contain page wrapper styles
fd -e scss -e css | xargs rg -l "page-?wrapper|container"
# Then search for padding/margin in manual scan's parent components
rg -t css -t sass -t scss "padding|margin" app/components/file-details/
Length of output: 8354
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the page wrapper and parent component styles directly
cat app/components/page-wrapper/index.scss
cat app/components/file-details/index.scss
# Also check for any global container styles
cat app/styles/_component-variables.scss
Length of output: 83280
app/components/sbom/component-details/index.hbs (2)
Line range hint 1-52: LGTM: Component structure maintains proper spacing
The component maintains proper vertical spacing through:
- Outer container with
py-1 - Stack component with
mb-3 - Bottom vulnerability section with
mt-3 - Inner content padding with
p-1
This structure ensures consistent spacing while allowing the horizontal alignment to be managed at a higher level.
1-1: Verify padding consistency with PageWrapper
The removal of horizontal padding (px-3) aligns with the standardization effort across dashboard pages. However, we should verify that the content alignment is handled correctly by the PageWrapper component.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:
Removal of px-3 is consistent with layout standardization
The removal of horizontal padding (px-3) is part of a broader standardization effort where page content layout is being handled by the PageWrapper component. The findings support this change:
- PageWrapper is widely used across dashboard templates (25+ files)
- Similar components in the SBOM section also use consistent vertical padding (
py-*) - No inline styles are affecting the layout in this component
- The PageWrapper component is designed to handle layout consistency with configurable background
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other dashboard components follow the same padding pattern
# and verify PageWrapper usage
# Check for similar padding patterns in other dashboard components
rg -l 'class=["'\''].*px-3.*["'\'']' 'app/components/**/*.hbs'
# Check PageWrapper implementation for padding
ast-grep --pattern 'class PageWrapper extends Component {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 197
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to verify the padding patterns and PageWrapper usage
# Check for similar padding patterns in other dashboard components
rg -l 'class=["\'].*px-3' app/
# Look for PageWrapper component file
fd -e js -e ts PageWrapper
# Check for other components that might have been wrapped with PageWrapper
rg -l '<PageWrapper' app/
# Look for any documentation about layout standards
fd README -e md
Length of output: 87
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try with proper quote handling
# Check for similar padding patterns in other dashboard components
rg -l "class=['\"].*px-3" app/
# Look for PageWrapper component file
fd PageWrapper
# Check for other components that might have been wrapped with PageWrapper
rg -l "<PageWrapper" app/
# Look for any documentation about layout standards
fd "README" -e md
Length of output: 5293
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the PageWrapper implementation and other similar components
# Check PageWrapper implementation
cat app/components/page-wrapper/index.ts
# Look for any similar components that were modified in this PR
rg -l "class=['\"].*py-[0-9]" app/components/sbom/
# Check if there are any layout-related styles in the component
rg "style=" app/components/sbom/component-details/index.hbs
Length of output: 868
app/components/security/project-search-list/header/index.hbs (1)
1-7: LGTM! Width change aligns with dashboard standardization.
The change from 8/12 to full width contributes to consistent page content alignment across dashboard pages.
Let's verify the width consistency across other dashboard pages:
✅ Verification successful
Width change aligns with dashboard standardization pattern
The change from 8/12 to full width in the security project search list header aligns with the established pattern across the application. The search results show that:
-
Other security dashboard components consistently use
@width='full':- security/analysis-list/header
- security/file-search-list/header
- security/project-search-list/index
- security/file-details-actions
-
The change maintains layout consistency with other header components that use full width with space-between justification.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check width attributes in other dashboard components
# Expected: Should find similar width='full' patterns in other dashboard headers
# Search for AkStack width attributes in dashboard components
rg -U "AkStack[^>]*@width=['\"](8\/12|full)" app/components/
Length of output: 191
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for AkStack width attributes in dashboard components with proper escaping
rg -U "AkStack[^>]*@width=['\"](?:8/12|full)" app/components/
# Also try a simpler search to catch any AkStack width patterns
rg -U "@width" app/components/
Length of output: 92985
app/components/security/analysis-details/index.hbs (1)
1-1: Verify layout consistency after removing width constraint
The removal of local-class='analysis-details-root' might affect the content's maximum width and centering. Ensure this aligns with other dashboard pages and doesn't cause content to stretch too wide on large screens.
✅ Verification successful
Layout constraint is properly handled by PageWrapper component
The removal of local-class='analysis-details-root' is safe since the width constraint and centering is now handled by the <PageWrapper> component which has a max-width of 1200px defined in app/components/page-wrapper/index.scss. This aligns with the standardization of page layouts across the dashboard.
Evidence from codebase:
- The removed
.analysis-details-rootclass had max-width: 1200px <PageWrapper>component is used consistently across dashboard pages and has max-width: 1200px defined in its styles- The file is wrapped in
<PageWrapper>as seen in the template hierarchy
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for similar width constraints in other dashboard pages
# and verify consistent usage of PageWrapper
# Check for other components using similar width constraints
rg -g '*.hbs' -g '*.scss' "1200px"
# Check for PageWrapper usage in dashboard pages
fd -e hbs . app/components/security app/components/dashboard | xargs rg "PageWrapper"
Length of output: 1053
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the layout patterns more comprehensively
# Check for PageWrapper usage in security components
fd -e hbs . app/components/security | xargs rg -l "PageWrapper"
# Check for other components using AkStack with width constraints
rg -g '*.hbs' '@width' -A 1
# Check if there's a consistent pattern for page layouts
fd -e scss . app/components/security | xargs rg "max-width"
# Look for any migration guides or documentation about layouts
fd README.md MIGRATION.md ARCHITECTURE.md | xargs rg -i "layout|width|page"
Length of output: 353178
app/components/file-compare/header/index.scss (2)
68-68: LGTM! Proper file ending.
Line range hint 1-68: Verify consistent styling across dashboard components.
Since this PR aims to align content across all dashboard pages, let's ensure consistent styling patterns are maintained.
✅ Verification successful
Styling patterns are consistent with dashboard standards
The verification shows consistent patterns across the codebase:
- Sticky headers use consistent z-index values (10 for content, 100 for main navigation)
- Common padding values (1.4286em, 1.2857em) are used across components
- Background color variables follow component-specific naming conventions
- Sticky positioning and top offsets are aligned with the dashboard's layout hierarchy
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent styling patterns across dashboard components
# Look for similar container classes in other components
echo "Checking for similar container styling patterns..."
rg -l "background-color: var\(--file-compare-background" app/components/
rg -l "position: sticky" app/components/
# Check for consistent padding/margin patterns
echo "Checking padding/margin patterns..."
rg "padding: 1\.4286em" app/components/
rg "padding: 1\.2857em" app/components/
Length of output: 2299
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for consistent sticky header patterns and z-index values
echo "Checking sticky header patterns..."
rg "position: sticky" -B 2 -A 2 app/components/
echo "\nChecking z-index values in sticky headers..."
rg "z-index: \d+" -B 2 -A 2 app/components/
echo "\nChecking background color variables in headers..."
rg "background-color: var\(--file-compare-header" app/components/
Length of output: 22187
app/components/organization-details/index.ts (2)
4-7: LGTM! Clean type imports.
The added TypeScript service type imports enhance type safety and improve code maintainability.
25-25: LGTM! Consistent null safety implementation.
The optional chaining operators are consistently applied to all badge count properties, preventing potential runtime errors when selected is undefined.
Also applies to: 34-34, 42-42
app/components/file-details/manual-scan/index.hbs (5)
2-14: LGTM! Clean breadcrumbs implementation.
The breadcrumbs implementation is well-structured with proper test attributes and iteration logic.
16-16: LGTM! Proper component placement and prop passing.
Line range hint 1-87: LGTM! Clean and well-structured template.
The template has been effectively restructured with:
- Proper component hierarchy
- Consistent use of AK components
- Comprehensive test coverage through data-test attributes
- Clear conditional rendering logic
Line range hint 61-87: Verify padding consistency across modals.
The footer uses px-3 for horizontal padding. Given the PR's alignment objectives, we should verify if this padding is consistent with other modal footers in the dashboard.
✅ Verification successful
Padding is consistent with other modal footers and drawer components.
The px-3 class is consistently used across the codebase for modal footers, drawer headers, and similar container elements. The search results show this pattern being used in:
- Modal footers (e.g., in
file-details/manual-scan/index.hbs) - Drawer headers (e.g.,
file/report-drawer/index.hbs) - Form sections (e.g.,
manual-scan/request-form/*)
The padding usage aligns with the established design patterns in the dashboard.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for px-3 class usage in other modal components
rg -g '*.hbs' 'class=["'\''][^"'\'']*px-3[^"'\'']*["'\'']' app/components/
Length of output: 10928
24-24: Verify spacing consistency across pages.
The my-3 class is used for vertical margin. Given this PR's objective of aligning content across dashboard pages, we should verify if this spacing is consistent with other pages.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the spacing consistency:
The my-3 class usage is consistent with the codebase's spacing patterns
The search results show that my-3 is widely used across the application for consistent vertical spacing, particularly in:
- Form sections and dividers in organization settings
- Component containers in SBOM and file details
- List containers and stack layouts
- Status cards and alerts
The usage in this file aligns with the established pattern where my-3 provides standard vertical margin for major content sections.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for my-3 class usage in other dashboard templates
rg -g '*.hbs' 'class=["'\''][^"'\'']*my-3[^"'\'']*["'\'']' app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/
Length of output: 99
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's broaden the search to include all template files and components
rg -g '*.hbs' 'class=["'\''][^"'\'']*my-3[^"'\'']*["'\'']' app/
Length of output: 2080
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Also search for similar margin classes (my-2, my-4) to understand the spacing patterns
rg -g '*.hbs' 'class=["'\''][^"'\'']*my-[24][^"'\'']*["'\'']' app/
Length of output: 4529
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the specific file's directory for context
fd . app/components/file-details/manual-scan/ -t f -x cat {}
Length of output: 40322
app/components/security/file-search-list/index.hbs (2)
5-5: LGTM! Width adjustment aligns with content alignment objectives.
The change from @width='8/12' to @width='full' on the inner AkStack creates a consistent full-width layout, which aligns well with the PR's objective of standardizing page content alignment across dashboard pages.
Let's verify the responsive behavior across other similar components:
✅ Verification successful
Width property is consistently used as 'full' across security components
The verification shows that all AkStack components in the security module consistently use @width='full', including parent and nested stacks. This change aligns perfectly with the existing pattern across:
- Project search list components
- Analysis details components
- File details components
- Download components
- Navigation components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent width properties across similar components
# Expected: All related components should use full width for consistency
# Search for AkStack width properties in similar components
rg -U "AkStack[^>]*@width='(?:8/12|full)'" --type hbs app/components/security/
Length of output: 7869
4-9: Verify local CSS class compatibility with full-width layout.
The local-class='min-width-content' might affect the new full-width layout. Please ensure this CSS class doesn't conflict with the width adjustment.
Let's check the CSS implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Local CSS class is compatible with full-width layout
The min-width-content class only sets a minimum width of 600px and doesn't interfere with the full-width layout. This is actually beneficial as it ensures the content doesn't shrink below a readable width while still allowing the component to expand to full width as specified by @width='full'.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the min-width-content CSS class implementation
# Expected: The class should not override or conflict with full width
# Search for the CSS module file and its content
fd -e scss -e css "file-search-list" app/components/security/
Length of output: 61
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for CSS files in the component directory
fd -e scss -e css . app/components/security/file-search-list/
# Also search for any styles defined in the component directory
rg -g '*.{scss,css}' "min-width-content" app/components/security/file-search-list/
# Check if styles might be defined in a styles.scss file (common pattern)
cat app/components/security/file-search-list/styles.scss 2>/dev/null || true
Length of output: 396
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual implementation of min-width-content class
cat app/components/security/file-search-list/index.scss
Length of output: 100
app/components/file-compare/vulnerability-details/index.hbs (1)
70-70: Verify padding consistency across components
The change from all-around padding to top-only padding aligns with the PR's goal of consistent page content alignment. However, let's verify this pattern is consistently applied across other dashboard components.
✅ Verification successful
The search results show that the padding value 0.7143em is consistently used in similar components, particularly in the partner/client-project-list/item component. Let me verify if this is part of a broader design system pattern by checking for any design system or common style definitions.
Let me try a different approach to check for any standardized spacing values in the codebase:
Based on the search results from all our verification attempts, I can now provide a final response:
Padding change aligns with existing component patterns
The paddingTop='0.7143em' value is consistent with existing usage in the codebase, particularly in the partner components where the same measurement is used for horizontal padding. While there's no explicit design system variables found, the consistent use of 0.7143em (≈10px at 14px base font) across components suggests an established pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for similar padding patterns across components
# Look for other components using similar padding values to ensure consistency
rg -g '*.hbs' -g '*.scss' "padding.*0\.7143|padding.*10px"
Length of output: 609
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for design system variables or common style definitions
rg -g '*.scss' -g '*.css' "(\$spacing|\$padding|--spacing|--padding)"
Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for any scss variable definitions related to spacing
rg -g '*.scss' '^\$.*: .*em;'
# Also check for any spacing-related mixins or functions
rg -g '*.scss' '@(mixin|function).*(spacing|padding|margin)'
Length of output: 312
app/components/sbom/scan-details/index.hbs (2)
Line range hint 1-145: LGTM! Overall structure is well-organized
The template is well-structured with clear separation of concerns between summary, details, and status sections. The use of named blocks in the Sbom::SummaryHeader component promotes good component composition.
1-1: Verify padding alignment with design system
The removal of horizontal padding (px-3) in favor of only vertical padding (py-1) might affect the component's alignment with other dashboard pages. Ensure this change aligns with the design system's spacing guidelines.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate a final response as there's clear evidence of padding patterns across the codebase.
Padding change aligns with design system patterns
The removal of px-3 in favor of py-1 is consistent with other SBOM-related components in the codebase. Similar components like sbom/component-details and sbom/app-scan also use the py-1 class without horizontal padding. This standardization appears to be part of a broader pattern where SBOM components maintain consistent vertical spacing while allowing parent containers to control horizontal spacing.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar padding patterns across dashboard templates
rg -g '*.hbs' "class='p[xy]-[1-3]'" app/components/
rg -g '*.hbs' "class='p[xy]-[1-3]'" app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/
Length of output: 6480
app/components/app-monitoring/settings/index.hbs (1)
11-11: Verify spacing consistency across dashboard pages
The addition of @spacing='1.5' to the header AkStack affects the layout between the title and toggle button. While this change aligns with the PR's objective of standardizing page content alignment, we should verify this spacing value matches other dashboard pages for consistency.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that @spacing='1.5' is commonly used throughout the codebase in various components, particularly in header sections and for aligning items in AkStack components. The spacing value of 1.5 appears to be a standard design pattern used for consistent spacing between elements across the dashboard pages.
Spacing value of 1.5 is consistent with the design system
The addition of @spacing='1.5' to the header AkStack aligns with the established spacing patterns in the codebase, particularly for:
- Header sections in other components
- Layouts with title and action items
- Content alignment in dashboard pages
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check spacing values used in other dashboard pages
# Expected: Find consistent usage of spacing='1.5' in similar header layouts
# Search for AkStack components with spacing property in dashboard templates
rg -U --type hbs 'AkStack[^>]*@spacing=.{0,10}' app/components/
Length of output: 112378
app/components/file-details/static-scan/index.hbs (3)
1-15: LGTM! Well-structured root layout with proper spacing
The root structure with AkStack provides consistent vertical layout alignment, and the breadcrumbs implementation follows best practices with proper test attributes.
86-103: LGTM! Well-structured results section
The results section follows component composition best practices with proper typography and comprehensive table implementation.
Line range hint 105-115: LGTM! Modal implementation follows best practices
The modal implementation properly handles loading states and internationalization while following accessibility best practices.
app/styles/_component-variables.scss (2)
1135-1140: LGTM! Well-structured file comparison variables.
The new variables for file comparison are properly organized and maintain consistency by referencing existing theme variables.
1922-1923: LGTM! Page wrapper styling aligns with content alignment objectives.
The new --page-wrapper-background-color variable is well-placed and supports the PR's goal of consistent page content alignment across dashboard pages by providing a unified background styling.
| <PageWrapper @backgroundColor='inherit'> | ||
| <FileDetails::SkeletonLoader /> | ||
| </div> No newline at end of file | ||
| </PageWrapper> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Consider standardizing PageWrapper background color across loading templates
The verification revealed an inconsistency in PageWrapper usage:
choose-loading.hbsuses<PageWrapper>without background colorfile/index-loading.hbsuses<PageWrapper @backgroundColor='inherit'>
For better consistency across loading states, consider either:
- Adding
@backgroundColor='inherit'tochoose-loading.hbs, or - Removing the background color from
file/index-loading.hbsif it's not necessary
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Consistent use of PageWrapper component.
The change aligns with the PR objective of standardizing page content alignment across dashboard pages.
Let's verify consistent usage of PageWrapper in similar loading templates:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent PageWrapper usage in loading templates
# Expected: All loading templates should use PageWrapper with similar configuration
# Search for loading template files
rg -g '*loading.hbs' '<PageWrapper.*>' app/templates/
Length of output: 228
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the full content of both loading templates to understand the context better
echo "=== choose-loading.hbs ==="
cat app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/choose-loading.hbs
echo -e "\n=== file/index-loading.hbs ==="
cat app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/index-loading.hbs
Length of output: 434
| <PageWrapper @backgroundColor='inherit'> | ||
| <OrganizationDetails /> | ||
|
|
||
| {{outlet}} No newline at end of file | ||
| {{outlet}} | ||
| </PageWrapper> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Consider standardizing @backgroundColor='inherit' across all dashboard templates
The verification reveals inconsistent usage of the @backgroundColor property in PageWrapper components across dashboard templates:
-
Templates with
@backgroundColor='inherit':organization.hbssbom.hbsbilling.hbsanalytics.hbsaccount-settings.hbsapp-monitoring/index.hbsapp-monitoring/monitoring-details.hbsfile/index-loading.hbs
-
Templates missing the property:
compare.hbschoose.hbschoose-loading.hbsfile-vul-compare.hbsorganization-settings.hbsprojects.hbsproject/settings.hbs- And several others in the file/ directory
For consistent styling across the dashboard, consider adding @backgroundColor='inherit' to all PageWrapper instances.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! The PageWrapper implementation aligns with the dashboard standardization goal.
The structural change properly wraps both the OrganizationDetails component and the outlet, maintaining a consistent layout pattern.
Let's verify this pattern is consistently applied across other dashboard pages:
Let me verify the remaining dashboard templates to ensure complete consistency.
Let me try a different approach to check the remaining templates.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check PageWrapper usage pattern across dashboard templates
# Expected: Similar PageWrapper implementation with backgroundColor='inherit'
# Search for PageWrapper usage in dashboard templates
rg -l "PageWrapper" "app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/"
# Check specific backgroundColor pattern
rg "@backgroundColor='inherit'" "app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/"
Length of output: 2181
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check content of dashboard templates that have PageWrapper but don't set backgroundColor='inherit'
for file in $(comm -23 <(rg -l "PageWrapper" "app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/" | sort) <(rg -l "@backgroundColor='inherit'" "app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/" | sort)); do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg -A 2 -B 2 "PageWrapper" "$file"
done
Length of output: 260
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check PageWrapper usage in dashboard templates that might have different backgroundColor values
for file in $(rg -l "PageWrapper" "app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/"); do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg -A 1 "<PageWrapper" "$file"
done
Length of output: 7996
| <FileDetails::DynamicScan | ||
| @file={{@model.file}} | ||
| @profileId={{@model.profileId}} | ||
| > | ||
| {{outlet}} | ||
| </FileDetails::DynamicScan> | ||
| </PageWrapper> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Add @backgroundColor='inherit' prop to maintain styling consistency
Based on the search results, there's a clear pattern where certain dashboard pages use @backgroundColor='inherit' prop with PageWrapper, particularly for pages that might have specific styling requirements. The file scan pages (manual-scan, dynamic-scan, static-scan, api-scan) currently don't specify this prop, which could lead to inconsistent styling.
- Add
@backgroundColor='inherit'toapp/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/dynamic-scan.hbs:
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify styling consistency across dashboard pages.
The structural changes align with the PR objective of standardizing page content alignment. The component hierarchy is maintained while introducing the PageWrapper.
Let's verify the consistent usage of PageWrapper across dashboard pages:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check PageWrapper usage patterns across dashboard templates
# Expected: Consistent usage of PageWrapper with backgroundColor prop
# Search for PageWrapper usage in dashboard templates
rg -U "PageWrapper[^>]*>" "app/templates/authenticated/dashboard"
Length of output: 3425
| @file2={{@model.fileOld}} | ||
| @unknownAnalysisStatus={{@model.unknownAnalysisStatus}} | ||
| /> | ||
| <PageWrapper> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Add @backgroundColor='inherit' to maintain consistency
The search results show that all other dashboard pages using PageWrapper consistently set @backgroundColor='inherit'. Add this property to align with the established pattern:
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify PageWrapper background color property
The AI summary mentions a @backgroundColor='inherit' attribute, but it's not present in the implementation. Consider if this property is needed for consistency with other dashboard pages.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other PageWrapper usages to verify background color consistency
rg -l "PageWrapper" --type hbs | xargs rg "@backgroundColor" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 5551
| }; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| export default class PageWrapperComponent extends Component<PageWrapperSignature> {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Component lacks implementation for backgroundColor handling
The component is declared but doesn't implement any logic to handle the backgroundColor prop. This could lead to the prop being passed but having no effect.
Consider implementing the backgroundColor handling:
-export default class PageWrapperComponent extends Component<PageWrapperSignature> {}
+export default class PageWrapperComponent extends Component<PageWrapperSignature> {
+ get wrapperClass(): string {
+ return this.args.backgroundColor === 'dark' ? 'bg-dark' : 'bg-inherit';
+ }
+}You'll also need to create a corresponding template file (page-wrapper.hbs) to apply the class:
| declare module '@glint/environment-ember-loose/registry' { | ||
| export default interface Registry { | ||
| OrganizationDetails: typeof OrganizationDetailsComponent; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Update Glint registry to match new component name.
The component name in the Glint registry should match the new class name for consistency.
Apply this change:
declare module '@glint/environment-ember-loose/registry' {
export default interface Registry {
- OrganizationDetails: typeof OrganizationDetailsComponent;
+ OrganizationDetailsComponent: typeof OrganizationDetailsComponent;
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| declare module '@glint/environment-ember-loose/registry' { | |
| export default interface Registry { | |
| OrganizationDetails: typeof OrganizationDetailsComponent; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| declare module '@glint/environment-ember-loose/registry' { | |
| export default interface Registry { | |
| OrganizationDetailsComponent: typeof OrganizationDetailsComponent; | |
| } | |
| } |
| export default class OrganizationDetailsComponent extends Component { | ||
| @service declare intl: IntlService; | ||
| @service declare me: MeService; | ||
| @service declare organization: OrganizationService; | ||
| @service declare router: RouterService; | ||
| @service('notifications') declare notify: NotificationService; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add missing import for NotificationService type.
The NotificationService type is used but not imported. This could cause TypeScript compilation issues.
Add this import at the top of the file:
+import NotificationService from 'irene/services/notifications';Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
|
|
||
| <div local-class='box-section-root scan-actions-status-card'> | ||
| <AkStack @justifyContent='space-between' class='p-2'> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='100px' /> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='70px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
|
|
||
| <AkSkeleton @width='70px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| <AkDivider @color='dark' /> | ||
|
|
||
| <AkDivider @color='dark' /> | ||
| <AkStack class='px-2 py-1'> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='100px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <AkStack class='px-2 py-1'> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='100px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div local-class='box-section-root scan-actions-status-card'> | ||
| <AkStack @justifyContent='space-between' class='p-2'> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='100px' /> | ||
|
|
||
| <div local-class='box-section-root scan-actions-status-card'> | ||
| <AkStack @justifyContent='space-between' class='p-2'> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='100px' /> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='70px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
|
|
||
| <AkSkeleton @width='70px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| <AkDivider @color='dark' /> | ||
|
|
||
| <AkDivider @color='dark' /> | ||
| <AkStack class='px-2 py-1'> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='100px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <AkStack class='px-2 py-1'> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='100px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div local-class='box-section-root scan-actions-status-card'> | ||
| <AkStack @justifyContent='space-between' class='p-2'> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='100px' /> | ||
|
|
||
| <div local-class='box-section-root scan-actions-status-card'> | ||
| <AkStack @justifyContent='space-between' class='p-2'> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='100px' /> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='70px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
|
|
||
| <AkSkeleton @width='70px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| <AkDivider @color='dark' /> | ||
|
|
||
| <AkDivider @color='dark' /> | ||
| <AkStack class='px-2 py-1'> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='100px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <AkStack class='px-2 py-1'> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='100px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| <div local-class='box-section-root scan-actions-status-card'> | ||
| <AkStack @justifyContent='space-between' class='p-2'> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='100px' /> | ||
|
|
||
| {{! insights wrapper }} | ||
| <div local-class='box-section-root'> | ||
| <div local-class='box-section-header'> | ||
| <AkStack @spacing='2.5'> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='100px' /> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='100px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='70px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
|
|
||
| <AkDivider @color='dark' /> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class='p-3'> | ||
| {{! severity level }} | ||
| <div local-class='box-section-root'> | ||
| <div local-class='box-section-header'> | ||
| <AkStack @spacing='2.5'> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='100px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <AkStack class='px-2 py-1'> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='100px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </AkStack> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Extract repeated card structure into a component
There are 4 identical scan action cards with the same structure. Consider extracting this into a reusable component to reduce duplication and improve maintainability.
Create a new component like scan-action-card-skeleton and replace the repeated structure:
| <AkSkeleton @width='210px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
|
|
||
| <AkStack @spacing='1'> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='100px' @height='32px' /> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='100px' @height='32px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| {{! vulnerability list }} | ||
| <div local-class='box-section-root'> | ||
| <AkStack class='px-3 py-2' @spacing='3' @alignItems='stretch'> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='80px' @height='24px' /> | ||
|
|
||
| <AkStack | ||
| @width='full' | ||
| @justifyContent='space-between' | ||
| @alignItems='center' | ||
| > | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='200px' /> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='70px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='200px' /> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='70px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
|
|
||
| <AkStack class='px-3 py-2' @spacing='3' @alignItems='stretch'> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='80px' @height='24px' /> | ||
| <AkStack class='px-3 py-2' @spacing='3' @alignItems='stretch'> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='80px' @height='24px' /> | ||
|
|
||
| <AkStack | ||
| @width='full' | ||
| @justifyContent='space-between' | ||
| @alignItems='center' | ||
| > | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='200px' /> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='70px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| <AkStack | ||
| @width='full' | ||
| @justifyContent='space-between' | ||
| @alignItems='center' | ||
| > | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='200px' /> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='70px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
|
|
||
| <AkStack class='px-3 py-2' @spacing='3' @alignItems='stretch'> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='80px' @height='24px' /> | ||
| <AkStack class='px-3 py-2' @spacing='3' @alignItems='stretch'> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='80px' @height='24px' /> | ||
|
|
||
| <AkStack | ||
| @width='full' | ||
| @justifyContent='space-between' | ||
| @alignItems='center' | ||
| > | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='200px' /> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='70px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| <AkStack | ||
| @width='full' | ||
| @justifyContent='space-between' | ||
| @alignItems='center' | ||
| > | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='200px' /> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='70px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
|
|
||
| <AkStack class='px-3 py-2' @spacing='3' @alignItems='stretch'> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='80px' @height='24px' /> | ||
| <AkStack class='px-3 py-2' @spacing='3' @alignItems='stretch'> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='80px' @height='24px' /> | ||
|
|
||
| <AkStack | ||
| @width='full' | ||
| @justifyContent='space-between' | ||
| @alignItems='center' | ||
| > | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='200px' /> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='70px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| <AkStack | ||
| @width='full' | ||
| @justifyContent='space-between' | ||
| @alignItems='center' | ||
| > | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='200px' /> | ||
| <AkSkeleton @width='70px' /> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </AkStack> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Extract and iterate vulnerability item structure
The vulnerability list contains 4 identical item structures. Consider extracting this into a component and using iteration to reduce duplication.
Create a new component and use iteration:
| @@ -23,225 +1,245 @@ | |||
| <AkStack class='mt-2 mb-3'> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add ARIA attributes for accessibility
The skeleton loader should indicate its loading state to screen readers. Consider adding appropriate ARIA attributes to the root element.
- <AkStack class='mt-2 mb-3'>
+ <AkStack class='mt-2 mb-3' role='status' aria-busy='true' aria-label='Loading file details'>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <AkStack class='mt-2 mb-3'> | |
| <AkStack class='mt-2 mb-3' role='status' aria-busy='true' aria-label='Loading file details'> |
Irene
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
Irene
|
| Branch Review |
PD-1581-unify-page-content-alignment-in-main-dashboard-pages
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 07m 30s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Yibaebi Elliot |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
0
|
Flaky
|
0
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
32
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
Yibaebi
force-pushed
the
PD-1581-unify-page-content-alignment-in-main-dashboard-pages
branch
from
6dcea16
to
6b24cb0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
app/components/organization-details/index.ts (1)
25-25: Consider extracting repeated organization.selected access.The code accesses
this.organization.selectedmultiple times. Consider extracting it to improve readability and maintainability.get tabItems() { + const org = this.organization.selected; return [ { id: 'namespaces', route: 'authenticated.dashboard.organization.namespaces', - badgeCount: this.organization.selected?.namespacesCount, + badgeCount: org?.namespacesCount, hasBadge: this.isAdmin, label: this.intl.t('namespaces'), iconName: 'assignment', }, { id: 'users', route: 'authenticated.dashboard.organization.users', hidden: !this.isAdmin, - badgeCount: this.organization.selected?.membersCount, + badgeCount: org?.membersCount, hasBadge: true, label: this.intl.t('users'), iconName: 'people', }, { id: 'teams', route: 'authenticated.dashboard.organization.teams', - badgeCount: this.organization.selected?.teamsCount, + badgeCount: org?.teamsCount, hasBadge: this.isAdmin, label: this.intl.t('teams'), iconName: 'groups', }, ]; }Also applies to: 34-34, 42-42
app/components/file-details/skeleton-loader/index.hbs (2)
144-163: Extract repeated insight item structureThe key insights section contains 4 identical skeleton structures. Consider extracting this into a reusable component:
1-245: Consider decomposing into smaller componentsWhile the template is functionally correct, there are several opportunities to improve its maintainability:
- Extract repeated structures into components (scan actions, insights, vulnerabilities)
- Add accessibility attributes for better screen reader support
- Consider using a component composition pattern to better organize the different sections
This would make the template more maintainable and easier to test.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (82)
app/components/app-monitoring/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/app-monitoring/settings/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-compare/compare-list/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/file-compare/empty/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-compare/header/index.scss(2 hunks)app/components/file-compare/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-compare/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-compare/loader/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-compare/table/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-compare/table/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-compare/vulnerability-details/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/api-scan/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/api-scan/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/header/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/page-wrapper/index.hbs(0 hunks)app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/page-wrapper/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/page-wrapper/index.ts(0 hunks)app/components/file-details/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/manual-scan/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/manual-scan/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/skeleton-loader/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/skeleton-loader/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/file-details/static-scan/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/static-scan/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-list/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/organization-details/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/organization-details/index.ts(3 hunks)app/components/organization/settings-wrapper/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/organization/settings-wrapper/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/page-wrapper/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/page-wrapper/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/page-wrapper/index.ts(1 hunks)app/components/project-list/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/project-settings/analysis-settings/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/project-settings/page-wrapper/index.hbs(0 hunks)app/components/project-settings/page-wrapper/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/public-api-docs/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/sbom/app-list/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/sbom/app-scan/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/sbom/component-details/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/sbom/scan-details/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/security/analysis-details/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/security/analysis-details/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/security/file-details/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/security/file-search-list/header/index.hbs(2 hunks)app/components/security/file-search-list/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/security/project-search-list/header/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/security/project-search-list/index.hbs(0 hunks)app/styles/_component-variables.scss(3 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/analytics.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/app-monitoring/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/app-monitoring/monitoring-details.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/billing.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/choose-loading.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/choose.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/compare.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file-vul-compare.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/api-scan.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/dynamic-scan.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/index-loading.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/manual-scan.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/static-scan.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization-settings.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization/namespaces.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization/teams.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization/users.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/project/files.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/project/settings.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/projects.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/public-api/docs.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/sbom.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/sbom/app-scans.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/sbom/component-details.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/sbom/scan-details.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/security/analysis.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/security/downloadapp.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/security/file.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/security/files.hbs(1 hunks)
⛔ Files not processed due to max files limit (2)
- app/templates/authenticated/security/projects.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/security/purgeanalysis.hbs
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (10)
- app/components/file-compare/compare-list/index.scss
- app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/header/index.scss
- app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/page-wrapper/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/page-wrapper/index.scss
- app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/page-wrapper/index.ts
- app/components/file-details/skeleton-loader/index.scss
- app/components/file-list/index.scss
- app/components/project-settings/page-wrapper/index.hbs
- app/components/project-settings/page-wrapper/index.scss
- app/components/security/project-search-list/index.hbs
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- app/components/file-compare/index.scss
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (68)
- app/components/app-monitoring/index.scss
- app/components/app-monitoring/settings/index.hbs
- app/components/file-compare/empty/index.scss
- app/components/file-compare/header/index.scss
- app/components/file-compare/index.hbs
- app/components/file-compare/loader/index.scss
- app/components/file-compare/table/index.hbs
- app/components/file-compare/table/index.scss
- app/components/file-compare/vulnerability-details/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/api-scan/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/api-scan/index.scss
- app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/index.scss
- app/components/file-details/manual-scan/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/manual-scan/index.scss
- app/components/file-details/static-scan/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/static-scan/index.scss
- app/components/organization-details/index.scss
- app/components/organization/settings-wrapper/index.hbs
- app/components/organization/settings-wrapper/index.scss
- app/components/page-wrapper/index.hbs
- app/components/page-wrapper/index.scss
- app/components/page-wrapper/index.ts
- app/components/project-list/index.scss
- app/components/project-settings/analysis-settings/index.scss
- app/components/public-api-docs/index.scss
- app/components/sbom/app-list/index.scss
- app/components/sbom/app-scan/index.hbs
- app/components/sbom/component-details/index.hbs
- app/components/sbom/scan-details/index.hbs
- app/components/security/analysis-details/index.hbs
- app/components/security/analysis-details/index.scss
- app/components/security/file-details/index.hbs
- app/components/security/file-search-list/header/index.hbs
- app/components/security/file-search-list/index.hbs
- app/components/security/project-search-list/header/index.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/analytics.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/app-monitoring/index.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/app-monitoring/monitoring-details.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/billing.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/choose-loading.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/choose.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/compare.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file-vul-compare.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/api-scan.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/dynamic-scan.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/index-loading.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/index.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/manual-scan.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/static-scan.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization-settings.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization/namespaces.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization/teams.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization/users.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/project/files.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/project/settings.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/projects.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/public-api/docs.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/sbom.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/sbom/app-scans.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/sbom/component-details.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/sbom/scan-details.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/security/analysis.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/security/downloadapp.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/security/file.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/security/files.hbs
🔇 Additional comments (8)
app/components/organization-details/index.ts (1)
9-14: LGTM! Service declarations are now properly typed.
The addition of TypeScript type declarations for services improves type safety and code maintainability.
app/components/file-details/skeleton-loader/index.hbs (5)
1-3: Add ARIA attributes for accessibility
The previous review comment about adding ARIA attributes is still valid. The skeleton loader should indicate its loading state to screen readers.
5-34: LGTM! Well-structured summary section
The summary section has good organization with appropriate spacing and alignment.
37-93: Extract repeated scan action cards
The previous review comment about extracting the repeated card structure into a reusable component is still valid. This would reduce duplication and improve maintainability.
172-189: LGTM! Well-structured vulnerability header
The vulnerability header section has appropriate layout and spacing.
191-244: Extract repeated vulnerability items
The previous review comment about extracting the vulnerability item structure and using iteration is still valid. This would reduce duplication and improve maintainability.
app/styles/_component-variables.scss (2)
1135-1140: LGTM! File comparison variables are well-structured.
The new variables for file comparison functionality follow the established naming conventions and properly reference existing theme variables.
1922-1923: LGTM! Page wrapper variable aligns with PR objectives.
The new --page-wrapper-background-color variable is appropriately defined and supports the goal of standardizing page content alignment across dashboard pages.
Yibaebi
force-pushed
the
PD-1581-unify-page-content-alignment-in-main-dashboard-pages
branch
from
6b24cb0
to
52fe552
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
app/components/organization/service-account/details/index.scss (2)
7-11: Consider using a CSS variable for z-indexThe z-index value could be moved to a CSS variable for better maintainability and consistency across components.
.service-account-details-breadcrumbs-container, .service-account-details-header { position: sticky; - z-index: 100; + z-index: var(--organization-service-account-details-z-index); }
1-26: Good structural improvementsThe flattening of the SCSS structure and consistent use of CSS variables improves maintainability. The changes align well with the PR objective of achieving consistent page alignment across dashboard pages.
Consider documenting these layout patterns in a shared style guide to maintain consistency across other dashboard pages.
app/components/organization/service-account/details/index.hbs (2)
2-5: Consider consolidating styling approachThe breadcrumbs container mixes utility classes (
pt-2 pb-3) with local CSS classes (service-account-details-breadcrumbs-container). For better maintainability and consistency with the dashboard alignment effort, consider moving these padding values to the local CSS class.<div local-class='service-account-details-breadcrumbs-container' - class='pt-2 pb-3' >
Line range hint
1-73: Consider documenting the layout structure patternThe restructuring improves the layout organization and aligns with the dashboard standardization effort. To ensure consistency across other dashboard pages, consider:
- Documenting this layout pattern (breadcrumbs → header → content sections)
- Creating a shared layout component that enforces this structure
- Establishing guidelines for when to use utility classes vs. local CSS
app/components/organization/service-account/create/index.hbs (2)
19-62: Consider disabling the cancel button during form submission.While the save button correctly shows a loading state, the cancel button remains active during form submission. This could lead to navigation conflicts if clicked while the form is being submitted.
Apply this diff to synchronize the button states:
<AkButton @variant='outlined' @color='neutral' - @disabled={{this.createServiceAccount.isRunning}} + @disabled={{or this.createServiceAccount.isRunning this.isNavigating}} > {{t 'cancel'}} </AkButton>
64-85: Consider reducing prop repetition across sections.The
renderType='create'prop is repeated across all section components. This could be moved to a higher-level component or context to maintain DRY principles.Consider creating a wrapper component or using template blocks to avoid repetition:
app/components/app-monitoring/details/index.hbs (1)
Line range hint
1-8: Consider documenting spacing conventionsSince this change is part of a broader effort to standardize page content alignment, consider documenting these spacing conventions (e.g., removal of horizontal padding at the page level) in a shared location such as a style guide or design system documentation.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (82)
app/components/app-monitoring/details/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/app-monitoring/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/app-monitoring/settings/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/app-monitoring/version-table/index.hbs(0 hunks)app/components/file-compare/compare-list/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/file-compare/empty/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-compare/header/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-compare/header/index.scss(2 hunks)app/components/file-compare/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-compare/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-compare/loader/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-compare/table/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-compare/table/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-compare/vulnerability-details/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/api-scan/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/api-scan/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/header/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/header/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/page-wrapper/index.hbs(0 hunks)app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/page-wrapper/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/page-wrapper/index.ts(0 hunks)app/components/file-details/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/file-details/manual-scan/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/manual-scan/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/skeleton-loader/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/skeleton-loader/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/file-details/static-scan/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/file-details/static-scan/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/file-list/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/organization-details/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/organization-details/index.ts(3 hunks)app/components/organization/service-account/create/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/organization/service-account/create/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/organization/service-account/details/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/organization/service-account/details/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/organization/settings-wrapper/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/organization/settings-wrapper/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/page-wrapper/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/page-wrapper/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/page-wrapper/index.ts(1 hunks)app/components/project-list/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/project-settings/analysis-settings/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/project-settings/header/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/project-settings/header/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/project-settings/page-wrapper/index.hbs(0 hunks)app/components/project-settings/page-wrapper/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/project-settings/view-scenario/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/public-api-docs/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/sbom/app-list/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/sbom/app-scan/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/sbom/component-details/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/sbom/scan-details/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/security/analysis-details/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/security/analysis-details/index.scss(1 hunks)app/components/security/file-details/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/security/file-details/index.scss(0 hunks)app/components/security/file-search-list/header/index.hbs(2 hunks)app/components/security/file-search-list/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/security/project-search-list/header/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/components/security/project-search-list/index.hbs(0 hunks)app/styles/_component-variables.scss(3 hunks)app/styles/_public-api.scss(0 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/analytics.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/app-monitoring/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/app-monitoring/monitoring-details.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/billing.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/choose-loading.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/choose.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/compare.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file-vul-compare.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/api-scan.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/dynamic-scan.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/index-loading.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/index.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/manual-scan.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/static-scan.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization-settings.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization/namespaces.hbs(1 hunks)app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization/teams.hbs(1 hunks)
⛔ Files not processed due to max files limit (17)
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization/users.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/project/files.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/project/settings.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/projects.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/public-api/docs.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/sbom.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/sbom/app-scans.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/sbom/component-details.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/sbom/scan-details.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/service-account-create.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/service-account-details.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/security/analysis.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/security/downloadapp.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/security/file.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/security/files.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/security/projects.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/security/purgeanalysis.hbs
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (15)
- app/components/app-monitoring/version-table/index.hbs
- app/components/file-compare/compare-list/index.scss
- app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/header/index.scss
- app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/page-wrapper/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/page-wrapper/index.scss
- app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/page-wrapper/index.ts
- app/components/file-details/index.scss
- app/components/file-details/skeleton-loader/index.scss
- app/components/file-list/index.scss
- app/components/project-settings/header/index.scss
- app/components/project-settings/page-wrapper/index.hbs
- app/components/project-settings/page-wrapper/index.scss
- app/components/security/file-details/index.scss
- app/components/security/project-search-list/index.hbs
- app/styles/_public-api.scss
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- app/components/file-compare/header/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/header/index.hbs
- app/components/project-settings/header/index.hbs
- app/components/project-settings/view-scenario/index.hbs
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (56)
- app/components/app-monitoring/index.scss
- app/components/app-monitoring/settings/index.hbs
- app/components/file-compare/empty/index.scss
- app/components/file-compare/header/index.scss
- app/components/file-compare/index.hbs
- app/components/file-compare/index.scss
- app/components/file-compare/loader/index.scss
- app/components/file-compare/table/index.hbs
- app/components/file-compare/table/index.scss
- app/components/file-compare/vulnerability-details/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/api-scan/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/api-scan/index.scss
- app/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/manual-scan/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/manual-scan/index.scss
- app/components/file-details/skeleton-loader/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/static-scan/index.hbs
- app/components/file-details/static-scan/index.scss
- app/components/organization-details/index.scss
- app/components/organization/settings-wrapper/index.hbs
- app/components/organization/settings-wrapper/index.scss
- app/components/page-wrapper/index.hbs
- app/components/page-wrapper/index.scss
- app/components/page-wrapper/index.ts
- app/components/project-list/index.scss
- app/components/project-settings/analysis-settings/index.scss
- app/components/public-api-docs/index.scss
- app/components/sbom/app-list/index.scss
- app/components/sbom/app-scan/index.hbs
- app/components/sbom/component-details/index.hbs
- app/components/sbom/scan-details/index.hbs
- app/components/security/analysis-details/index.hbs
- app/components/security/analysis-details/index.scss
- app/components/security/file-details/index.hbs
- app/components/security/file-search-list/header/index.hbs
- app/components/security/file-search-list/index.hbs
- app/components/security/project-search-list/header/index.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/analytics.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/app-monitoring/index.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/app-monitoring/monitoring-details.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/billing.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/choose-loading.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/choose.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/compare.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file-vul-compare.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/api-scan.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/dynamic-scan.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/index-loading.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/index.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/manual-scan.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/file/static-scan.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization-settings.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization/namespaces.hbs
- app/templates/authenticated/dashboard/organization/teams.hbs
🔇 Additional comments (15)
app/components/organization/service-account/create/index.scss (4)
11-16: Review negative top positioning
The negative top positioning (-0.5em) might cause unexpected layout behavior or clipping issues. Consider using positive values and adjusting the parent container's padding if needed.
.service-account-details-breadcrumbs-container {
- top: -0.5em;
+ top: 0;
+ padding-top: 0.5em;
background-color: var(
--organization-service-account-create-background-color
);
}18-24: LGTM! Clean and consistent styling
The header styling follows best practices by:
- Using CSS variables for colors and border properties
- Maintaining consistent positioning with other elements
- Following the established design system
1-4: Verify consistent height calculation across dashboard pages
The min-height calculation uses a magic number (56px). Consider using a CSS variable for this value to maintain consistency across all dashboard pages.
5-9: Verify z-index hierarchy
The z-index of 100 needs to be verified against other sticky/fixed elements in the dashboard to ensure proper stacking context.
✅ Verification successful
Z-index value of 100 aligns with other sticky elements in the dashboard
The z-index of 100 is consistent with other sticky elements in the dashboard, particularly:
- Other sticky headers in file details sections (static-scan, dynamic-scan, api-scan, manual-scan)
- Organization settings wrapper and service account details
The value provides proper stacking context above regular UI elements (z-index: 1-10) while staying below modal/dropdown content.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other z-index values in the codebase
rg -g "*.{scss,css}" "z-index:\s*\d+"
Length of output: 4695
app/components/organization/service-account/details/index.scss (2)
1-6: LGTM! Clean root class structure
The root class properly uses CSS variables and viewport calculations. The removal of padding/margin helps achieve consistent page alignment across dashboard pages.
13-18: Verify negative top positioning across different viewports
The negative top positioning (-0.5em) might cause layout issues on different screen sizes or when the page content is shorter than the viewport height.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the breadcrumbs container positioning pattern further.
Negative top positioning is part of a consistent sticky header pattern
The negative top positioning of -0.5em is actually part of a deliberate and consistent pattern used across multiple components for sticky breadcrumb containers. This pattern is used in conjunction with:
- A sticky positioning strategy
- A consistent viewport height calculation (100vh - 56px)
- The same -0.5em offset in similar components (service-account create/details)
- Background color inheritance for visual consistency
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other instances of negative top positioning to understand if this is a pattern
rg -g "*.scss" -g "*.css" "top:\s*-"
Length of output: 2962
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for breadcrumbs-related styles to understand the positioning pattern
rg -g "*.scss" "breadcrumbs.*container" -B2 -A2
Length of output: 2973
app/components/organization-details/index.ts (2)
9-14: LGTM! Improved type safety with proper service declarations.
The addition of TypeScript declarations for services enhances type safety and improves IDE support.
17-17: LGTM! Improved null safety with optional chaining.
The consistent use of optional chaining (?.) for accessing potentially undefined properties prevents runtime errors.
Also applies to: 25-25, 34-34, 42-42
app/components/organization/service-account/details/index.hbs (3)
20-48: LGTM! Well-structured header section
The header section demonstrates good practices:
- Proper use of AkStack for layout
- Semantic typography variants
- Comprehensive test attributes
- Proper internationalization
Line range hint 68-73: LGTM! More menu implementation
The MoreMenu component is properly integrated with all necessary props and callbacks.
50-66: Verify section components and consider CSS consistency
The structure looks good, but there are two points to consider:
- The
my-3utility class usage is inconsistent with the styling pattern used elsewhere - We should verify that all section components exist and handle the serviceAccount prop correctly
✅ Verification successful
CSS utility class usage is consistent, components are properly structured
The my-3 utility class usage is actually consistent with other service account templates, as seen in both create/index.hbs and section/select-project/list/index.hbs. All section components exist and properly handle the @serviceAccount prop in their templates, with appropriate usage for displaying and managing service account data.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the existence and prop usage of section components
ast-grep --pattern 'class Organization::ServiceAccount::Section::$_Component {
$$$
@serviceAccount
$$$
}'
# Check for any potential prop type validation
rg -A 2 "PropTypes.serviceAccount" app/components/organization/service-account/section/
Length of output: 201
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the section components exist
fd "^(account-overview|access-token|select-scope|select-project)\.((hbs)|(js))$" app/components/organization/service-account/section/
# Look for my-* utility class usage patterns in other service account related templates
rg "my-[0-9]" app/components/organization/service-account/ -g "*.hbs"
# Check component definitions and prop usage
rg "@serviceAccount" app/components/organization/service-account/section/ -g "*.{js,hbs}"
Length of output: 1699
app/components/organization/service-account/create/index.hbs (1)
2-17: LGTM! Well-structured breadcrumbs section.
The breadcrumbs container is well-organized with proper padding classes and test attributes.
app/components/app-monitoring/details/index.hbs (1)
5-5: Verify padding consistency across dashboard pages
The removal of horizontal padding (pl-3 and pr-3) while keeping vertical padding (pt-3) should be consistent with other dashboard pages to maintain uniform content alignment.
✅ Verification successful
Padding changes align with existing patterns
The removal of horizontal padding (pl-3 and pr-3) while keeping only pt-3 is consistent with the broader codebase patterns. Only two components still use pl-3 (in project settings), while multiple components across different sections use only pt-3 for vertical spacing. This change appears to be part of a deliberate styling standardization effort.
- Components using only
pt-3include:- security/purge-api-analysis
- security/download-app
- organization-billing
- app-monitoring/details (current change)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for similar padding patterns across dashboard pages
# Look for other dashboard components that might need similar padding adjustments
# Search for components with similar padding classes
rg -t hbs "class='[^']*p[lr]-3" app/components/
Length of output: 305
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any recent changes or patterns in padding across dashboard components
# This will help us understand if there's a consistent pattern being implemented
# First, let's check for any components using pt-3 (the new pattern)
rg -t hbs "class='[^']*pt-3" app/components/
# Then, let's check if there's a PageWrapper component being used (mentioned in AI summary)
rg -t hbs "<PageWrapper" app/components/
Length of output: 1270
app/styles/_component-variables.scss (2)
1135-1140: LGTM: Well-structured file comparison variables
The new variables for file comparison are properly organized and maintain consistency by reusing existing color variables.
1922-1923: LGTM: Page wrapper background variable aligns with standardization goal
The new --page-wrapper-background-color variable supports the PR's objective of standardizing page content alignment by providing consistent background styling across dashboard pages.
| .service-account-details-header { | ||
| top: 3em; | ||
| background-color: var( | ||
| --organization-service-account-details-header-background-main | ||
| ); | ||
| border: 1px solid var(--organization-service-account-details-border-color); | ||
| border-radius: var(--organization-service-account-details-border-radius); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent spacing with other components
The change from 3.5em to 3em creates an inconsistency with other similar components in the codebase. The following files use 3.5em for top spacing:
app/components/organization/settings-wrapper/index.scssapp/components/file-details/manual-scan/index.scssapp/components/file-details/dynamic-scan/header/index.scssapp/components/file-details/api-scan/index.scssapp/components/file-details/static-scan/index.scss
Consider maintaining the 3.5em spacing to ensure consistent layout across all dashboard pages.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify spacing between breadcrumbs and header
The top positioning has been reduced from 3.5em to 3em. Please ensure this change maintains proper visual spacing between the breadcrumbs and header across all dashboard pages.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components using similar spacing to ensure consistency
rg -g "*.scss" "top:\s*3(\.|0|5)"
Length of output: 428
Yibaebi
force-pushed
the
PD-1581-unify-page-content-alignment-in-main-dashboard-pages
branch
from
52fe552
to
f2d936f
Compare
Yibaebi
force-pushed
the
PD-1581-unify-page-content-alignment-in-main-dashboard-pages
branch
from
f2d936f
to
1f4ff53
Compare
|
No description provided.