Apologies, but in my original writing of this issue I used a comment from polaris, which is reflected in your commit; I suggest using a comment from aurora instead. (I later updated the original issue but perhaps you were never notified.)

FURTHER, this morning I went back to aurora and discovered that if one adds a "w" (wide) option to the qstat command then the comment is not truncated; improves readability. So I further refine my suggestion (check it out @weallcock):

qstat -xfw [JOBID] | grep comment

Select comments after executing "qstat -xfw" against all aurora jobs this morning:
comment = Not Running: Job is requesting an exclusive node and node is in use and terminated
comment = Not Running: Node is in an ineligible state: down and terminated
comment = Not Running: Node is in an ineligible state: offline and terminated
comment = Not Running: Job would conflict with reservation or top job and terminated
comment = Not Running: User has reached queue LustreApps running job limit. and terminated
comment = Not Running: Node is in an ineligible state: down
comment = Not Running: Insufficient amount of resource: at_queue and terminated
comment = Not Running: Insufficient amount of resource: tier0 and terminated
comment = Not Running: Insufficient amount of resource: ncpus and terminated
comment = Not Running: Queue not started. and terminated
comment = job held, too many failed attempts to run
comment = job held, too many failed attempts to run and terminated
comment = Job held by osborn on Tue Feb 6 05:20:00 2024 and terminated
comment = Can Never Run: Insufficient amount of resource: ncpus (R: 2209792 A: 2165904 T: 2165904)

Looks good to me, though I note this change includes two separate references to 'comment = job held, too many failed attempts to run', with slightly different advice text in response. (Imo it's fine as is if you don't want to tweak it further; just pointing it out in case you do.)