Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Potential discrepancy in DAOS stats #413

Closed
felker opened this issue May 11, 2024 · 5 comments · Fixed by #491
Closed

Potential discrepancy in DAOS stats #413

felker opened this issue May 11, 2024 · 5 comments · Fixed by #491
Assignees

Comments

@felker
Copy link
Member

felker commented May 11, 2024

https://github.com/argonne-lcf/user-guides/blob/main/docs/aurora/data-management/daos/aurora-storage-architecture.png

  • 220 PB
  • 25 TB/s

Compared to some other recent talks like ATPESC 2023, which lists:

  • 230 PB
  • 31 TB/s

The latter figures are more common, I think. What is the right answer?

@felker
Copy link
Member Author

felker commented May 29, 2024

@kevin-harms

@kevin-harms
Copy link
Contributor

The 220PB number is correct. I can update the ≥ 25TBs to be 31TBs in the image and upload a new version.

@felker
Copy link
Member Author

felker commented May 30, 2024

thanks @kevin-harms!

@felker
Copy link
Member Author

felker commented Jul 14, 2024

do you have a new image ready @kevin-harms ?

@felker
Copy link
Member Author

felker commented Oct 4, 2024

I also see from the IAC talk from June 2023 that the DAOS system has 250 PB NVMe at 31 TB/s, but only ~230 PB of usable capacity @ EC16+2

depends on what users choose for data protection – EC16+2 is erasure code with 16 data chunks and 2 parity chunks (allows surviving 2 failures)

I will just make a new PNG myself, unless you have the PPTX source @kevin-harms

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants