Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat (eos_designs): Accept auto as argument for rd_override #4857

Open
1 task done
rrajpuro-anet opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #4858
Open
1 task done

Feat (eos_designs): Accept auto as argument for rd_override #4857

rrajpuro-anet opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #4858
Assignees
Labels
type: enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@rrajpuro-anet
Copy link

Enhancement summary

The request is to allow the specific keyword rd_override: auto when set overrrides rd to auto.

Which component of AVD is impacted

eos_designs

Use case example

When migrating existing DC deployments to AVD we find customer using rd auto which is currently not supported in AVD.

Describe the solution you would like

Existing rd_override supports two formats:

  • A single number will be used in the RD assigned number subfield (second part of the RD).
  • A full RD string with colon separator which will override the full RD.

Can we include a third format auto

Describe alternatives you have considered

No response

Additional context

No response

Contributing Guide

  • I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
@rrajpuro-anet rrajpuro-anet added the type: enhancement New feature or request label Jan 6, 2025
@rrajpuro-anet rrajpuro-anet changed the title Accept RD override to auto Feat (eos_cli_config_gen): Accept auto as argument for rd_override Jan 6, 2025
@gmuloc gmuloc changed the title Feat (eos_cli_config_gen): Accept auto as argument for rd_override Feat (eos_designs): Accept auto as argument for rd_override Jan 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant