-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathFree Markets Are Intrinsic to Humans.html
139 lines (139 loc) · 6.13 KB
/
Free Markets Are Intrinsic to Humans.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
<html>
<head>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles2.css" />
</head>
<body>
<p>![[Naval-Ep3.mp3]]</p>
<p>We use credits and debits to cooperate across genetic boundaries</p>
<p>Free markets are intrinsic to the human species</p>
<p>
**Naval:** Overall capitalism [meaning free markets] is intrinsic to
the human species. Capitalism is not something we invented. Capitalism is
not even something we discovered. It is in us in every exchange that we
have.
</p>
<p>
When you and I exchange information, I want some information back from
you. I give you information. You give me information. If we weren’t having
a good information exchange, you’d go talk to somebody else. So, the
notion of exchange, and keeping track of credits and debits, this is built
into us as flexible social animals.
</p>
<p>
We are the only animals in the animal kingdom that cooperate across
genetic boundaries. Most animals don’t even cooperate. But when they do,
they cooperate only in packs where they co-evolve together, and they share
blood, so they have some shared interests.
</p>
<p>
Humans don’t have that. I can cooperate with you guys. One of you is a
Serbian. The other one is a Persian by origin. And I’m Indian by origin.
We have very little blood in common, basically none. But we still
cooperate.
</p>
<p>
What lets us cooperate? It’s because we can keep track of debits and
credits. Who put in how much work? Who contributed how much? That’s all
free market capitalism is.
</p>
<p>
So, I strongly believe that it is innate to the human species, and we are
going to create more and more wealth, and abundance for everybody.
</p>
<p>
Everybody can be wealthy. Everybody can be retired. Everybody can be
successful. It is merely a question of education and desire. You have to
want it. If you don’t want it, that’s fine. Then you opt out of the game.
</p>
<p>
But don’t try to put down the people who are playing the game. Because
that’s the game that keeps you in a comfortable warm bed at night. That’s
the game that keeps a roof over your head. That’s the game that keeps your
supermarkets stocked. That’s the game that keeps the iPhone buzzing in
your pocket.
</p>
<p>
So, it is a beautiful game that is worth playing ethically, rationally,
morally, socially for the human race. It’s going to continue to make us
all richer and richer, until we have massive wealth creation for anybody
who wants it.
</p>
<p>
<strong
>Too many takers and not enough makers will plunge a society into
ruin</strong
>
</p>
<p>
<strong>Nivi:</strong> It’s not just individuals secretly despising
wealth, right? There are countries, groups, political parties that overtly
despise wealth. Or at least seem to.
</p>
<p>
<strong>Naval:</strong> That’s right. What those countries, political
parties, and groups are reduced to is playing the zero-sum game of status.
In the process to destroy wealth creation, they drag everybody down to
their level.
</p>
<p>
Which is why the U.S. is a very popular country for immigrants because of
the American dream. Anyone can come here, be poor, and then work really
hard and make money, and get wealthy. But even just make some basic money
for their life.
</p>
<p>
Obviously, the definition of wealth is different for different people. A
First World citizen’s definition of wealth might be, “Oh, I have to make
millions of dollars, and I’m completely done.”
</p>
<p>
Whereas to a Third World poor immigrant just entering the country, and we
were poor immigrants who came here when I as fairly young, to the United
States, wealth may just be a much lower number. It may just be, “I don’t
have to work a manual labor job for the rest of my life that I don’t want
to work.”
</p>
<p>
But groups that despise it will essentially bring the entire group to that
level. If you get too many takers, and not enough makers, society falls
apart. You end up with a communist country.
</p>
<p>
Look at Venezuela, right? They were so busy taking, and dividing, and
reallocating, that people are literally starving in the streets, and
losing kilograms of body weight every year just from sheer starvation.
</p>
<p>
Another way to think about it is imagine an organism that has too many
parasites. You need some small number of parasites to stay healthy.
</p>
<p>
You need a lot of symbiotes. All the mitochondria in all of our cells that
help us respirate and burn oxygen. These are symbiotes that help us
survive. We couldn’t survive without them.
</p>
<p>
But, to me, those are partners in the wealth creation that creates the
human body. But if you just were filled with parasites, if you got
infected with worms, or a virus, or bacteria that were purely parasitical,
you would die. So, any organism can only withstand a small number of
parasites. When the parasitic element gets too far out of control, you
die.
</p>
<p>
Again I’m talking about ethical wealth creation. I’m not talking about
monopolies. I’m not talking about crony capitalism. I’m not talking about
mispriced externalities like the environment.
</p>
<p>
I’m talking about free minds, and free markets. Small-scale exchange
between humans that’s voluntary, and doesn’t have an outsized impact on
others.
</p>
<p>
I think that kind of wealth creation, if a society does not respect it, if
the group does not respect it, then society will plunge into ruin, and
darkness.
</p>
</body>
</html>