Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WARES 2nd IF code needed #40

Open
teuben opened this issue Nov 30, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

WARES 2nd IF code needed #40

teuben opened this issue Nov 30, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels
Basically Done all but marked as done

Comments

@teuben
Copy link
Contributor

teuben commented Nov 30, 2022

Code is needed on the data acquisition side as well as pipeline side when the 2nd IF is in place.
This will use roach4..7 files.

@teuben
Copy link
Contributor Author

teuben commented Nov 30, 2022

New experimental code is now in the branch "IF2". It has been tested by using symlinks and faking the 2nd IF to be the first. This seemed to work.

More sanity testing on filename convention OBSNUM_BANK (where bank=0,1) is needed.

@teuben
Copy link
Contributor Author

teuben commented Nov 30, 2022

See also #18

@teuben
Copy link
Contributor Author

teuben commented Apr 25, 2023

The current scheme for obsnum_bank is cumbersome if different flagging, mapping is needed. Although it remains useful to have a before and after view of the pipeline results, now this is the only sane way to reduce 2IF data. Example for M17:

 SLpipeline.sh obsnum=108768 dv=50 dw=50 restart=1 
 SLpipeline.sh obsnum=108768 bank=0 pix_list=-0,5,12,13,14,15 
 SLpipeline.sh obsnum=108768 bank=1 pix_list=-0,2,3,4,12,13   

not to mention that the resulting image appears to be suspiciously swapped in the RA direction.

@teuben
Copy link
Contributor Author

teuben commented May 2, 2023

Additional requirement: any of the two restfreq's could be a 0, in which case there will be no data from the corresponding roach (0..3 or 4..7) boards. numbands however will be 2, so the pipeline will need to deal with this setup.

@teuben teuben added the Basically Done all but marked as done label Feb 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Basically Done all but marked as done
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant