We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I have some code that implements this using wrapper types, but would really love for a trait like this to exist:
A proposed async-tls-acceptor crate that publishes this trait:
#[async_trait] pub trait Acceptor<Input>: Clone + Send + Sync + 'static where Input: AsyncRead + AsyncWrite + Send + Sync + Unpin + 'static, { type Output: AsyncRead + AsyncWrite + Send + Sync + Unpin + 'static; type Error: std::fmt::Debug + Send + Sync; async fn accept(&self, input: Input) -> Result<Self::Output, Self::Error>; }
The implementation for async-native-tls would be:
#[async_trait] impl<Input> Acceptor<Input> for async_native_tls::TlsAcceptor where Input: AsyncRead + AsyncWrite + Send + Sync + Unpin + 'static, { type Output = async_native_tls::TlsStream<Input>; type Error = async_native_tls::Error; async fn accept(&self, input: Input) -> Result<Self::Output, Self::Error> { async_native_tls::TlsAcceptor::accept(&self, input).await } }
Would this be welcomed?
refs: async-rs/async-tls#43
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
at first sight this seems reasonable to me. Let's see what async-tls thinks about this as well.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
I have some code that implements this using wrapper types, but would really love for a trait like this to exist:
A proposed async-tls-acceptor crate that publishes this trait:
The implementation for async-native-tls would be:
Would this be welcomed?
refs: async-rs/async-tls#43
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: