Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ETCD provider #2077

Open
HackPoint opened this issue Dec 4, 2023 · 6 comments
Open

ETCD provider #2077

HackPoint opened this issue Dec 4, 2023 · 6 comments

Comments

@HackPoint
Copy link

I need to implement this in .NET:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/asynkron/protoactor-go/dev/cluster/clusterproviders/etcd/etcd_provider.go

Do you have a concrete example of this? in C#

Would really ease up my task, I'm new to all of the cluster providers stuff

@DenizPiri
Copy link
Contributor

We have an Etcd provider that we built and have been using for the last 2 years or so without issues.
However, ours definitely won't be compatible with the etcd provider of the protoactor-go.

@rogeralsing @mhelleborg Should I contribute our etcd provider? Or skip? Given that it is not meant to be compatible with protoactor-go and that could cause confusion for most users.

@rogeralsing
Copy link
Contributor

@DenizPiri I´d love that.
As long as we document that the provider is incompatible then it´s all fine.

@HackPoint
Copy link
Author

@rogeralsing I've implemented this provider exactly as you did with go. Maybe should I open source it?

@rogeralsing
Copy link
Contributor

@HackPoint I´d love to see both and we can decide from there.
If it aligns with Go, that´s great. on the other hand, @DenizPiri´s version has been battle-tested.

@HackPoint
Copy link
Author

HackPoint commented Apr 13, 2024

@HackPoint I´d love to see both and we can decide from there.

If it aligns with Go, that´s great. on the other hand, @DenizPiri´s version has been battle-tested.

Mine is working solution in my company

@rogeralsing
Copy link
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants