Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

level ranking / gamification / popularity / likes / etc #64

Open
auburnsummer opened this issue Mar 26, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

level ranking / gamification / popularity / likes / etc #64

auburnsummer opened this issue Mar 26, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@auburnsummer
Copy link
Owner

auburnsummer commented Mar 26, 2023

General discussion, I don't have any direction on implementation yet.

#pharmacy discussion is:

  • it would be nice to have some way to play "good levels" if it's your first time on the site

  • Peer Review / setlists / manual curation is not sufficient

  • sorting by download count / direct "likes" etc will cause misaligned incentives with level creators (bad, don't do it)

  • SO: the site just honestly feels far too overwhelming

  • SO: [additional level ranking is] clearly good for players, especially new players, streamers etc, but bad for creators, or at least for the current ecosystem of the rd levelmaking community

  • Donte: handle this mario maker style and try and make it "fun" to find levels? Nudge and mess with things so it doesn't feel super algorithmic?

  • what if we added ranking in a gamified impersonal way?

  • Donte: like instead of simply having a rating box we have a "rating" game where it gives you 3/5/10 random levels and asks you to rate them, this way we avoid the undertale song problem and the buried level problem

    • auburn note: the "undertale song problem" is mediocre levels being "the most popular" bc they have songs from popular IPs
  • and said ranking doesn't need to be public facing either.

    • might still be exposed in api.rhythm.cafe but I can expect people won't go to that
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant