Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Autoware keeps acceleration less than 0 and the ego vehicle does not drive at all from the starting point. #8033

Open
3 tasks done
Kim-mins opened this issue Jul 15, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
component:control Vehicle control algorithms and mechanisms. (auto-assigned) component:planning Route planning, decision-making, and navigation. (auto-assigned) simulator:carla Issue related to CARLA simulator status:stale Inactive or outdated issues. (auto-assigned)

Comments

@Kim-mins
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist

  • I've read the contribution guidelines.
  • I've searched other issues and no duplicate issues were found.
  • I'm convinced that this is not my fault but a bug.

Description

Hi team,

I'm currently running Autoware with Carla using bridge implementation, and I found a situation that Autoware keeps acceleration less than 0 and the ego vehicle does not drive at all from the starting point.

Here's the rviz video of the situation: [video] and corresponding launch.log file: [launch.log]

When I checked the control command by subscribing the topic /control/command/control_cmd and plotted acceleration and speed as below, it showed that the acceleration is below 0 and the speed does not increase (the values oscillates though..).
image

Expected behavior

I hope the ego vehicle to drive well to the goal point.

Actual behavior

But the ego vehicle does not start to drive.

Steps to reproduce

Here's the ros2bag file for the reproduction: [ros2bag]

Versions

Possible causes

No response

Additional context

I thought this issue is not duplicated with #8032, as no logs in launch.log says process died.

@maxime-clem maxime-clem added component:planning Route planning, decision-making, and navigation. (auto-assigned) component:control Vehicle control algorithms and mechanisms. (auto-assigned) labels Jul 15, 2024
@VRichardJP
Copy link
Contributor

Your logs basically show 3 errors:

1720950077.5001881 [component_container_mt-64] [ERROR] [1720950077.499698771] [compressed_depth_image_transport]: Compressed Depth Image Transport - Compression requires single-channel 32bit-floating point or 16bit raw depth images (input format is: rgb8).
1720950077.5126553 [component_container_mt-6] [WARN] [1720950077.511458876] [sensing.lidar.concatenate_data]: transformed_raw_points[/sensing/lidar/left/pointcloud] is nullptr, skipping pointcloud publish.
1720950077.5150239 [component_container_mt-6] [WARN] [1720950077.511521889] [sensing.lidar.concatenate_data]: transformed_raw_points[/sensing/lidar/right/pointcloud] is nullptr, skipping pointcloud publish.

Concatenated lidar data is required by the perception pipeline, so the concatenation issue could be blocking in your case.

Did you check Autoware diagnostics with RQT for other potential issues?

@Kim-mins
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for the response @VRichardJP!

Actually, I did not check the whole perception pipeline, but I checked that the car drives well in most of the cases even with the messages above, and it is not that frequent to stuck at the starting point.

To my knowledge, those error messages are from the bridge implementation as the bridge is not handling the topics /sensing/lidar/left/pointcloud and /sensing/lidar/right/pointcloud.
I'll check if those errors are relevant to this issue soon.

Thanks!

@maxime-clem maxime-clem added the simulator:carla Issue related to CARLA simulator label Jul 17, 2024
@Kim-mins
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @VRichardJP!

When running simulation on Carla with the bridge, there's the only LiDAR for the ego vehicle due to performance issue, so it seems we need not to process those topics for now. (Thank you for checking @maxime-clem!)

Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 15, 2024

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity.

@stale stale bot added the status:stale Inactive or outdated issues. (auto-assigned) label Sep 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component:control Vehicle control algorithms and mechanisms. (auto-assigned) component:planning Route planning, decision-making, and navigation. (auto-assigned) simulator:carla Issue related to CARLA simulator status:stale Inactive or outdated issues. (auto-assigned)
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants