Should we also export AVOCADO_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR on runnable-run? #3804
beraldoleal
started this conversation in
RFC
Replies: 1 comment
-
If we consider the following documentation and discussions about the N(ext)Runner:
It is clear to me that the only entity responsible for running a test is a Task. In this case, in my opinion, besides testing during the development, I don't see the need to have a Based on the previous statement, for the problem described here, the task should be responsible for providing the information on |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
After 7b311fb, tests can access an environment variable (
AVOCADO_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR
) to know where to put OUTPUT files.Today, this is only visible on Task level:
But when running with
runnable-run
it is not available:Should we change this behavior?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions