Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chore/prepare v2 #22

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 25, 2024
Merged

Chore/prepare v2 #22

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 25, 2024

Conversation

ccamel
Copy link
Member

@ccamel ccamel commented Nov 25, 2024

Self explanatory.

See axone-protocol/axoned#586 for reference.

@ccamel ccamel self-assigned this Nov 25, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 25, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request primarily updates the import paths for the Prolog library and its engine across multiple files to reference version 2 of the library. The changes affect various components, including the interpreter, main application files, and examples, ensuring that all references to the Prolog library are consistent with the new version. The core functionality and logic within these files remain unchanged, maintaining existing behaviors while transitioning to the updated library structure.

Changes

File Change Summary
cmd/1pl/interpreter.go Updated import paths from github.com/axone-protocol/prolog to github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2 and from github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/engine to github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2/engine.
cmd/1pl/main.go Updated import paths from github.com/axone-protocol/prolog to github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2 and from github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/engine to github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2/engine.
examples/call_go_from_prolog/main.go Updated import paths from github.com/axone-protocol/prolog to github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2 and from github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/engine to github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2/engine.
examples/dcg/main.go Updated import path from github.com/axone-protocol/prolog to github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2.
examples/embed_prolog_into_go/main.go Updated import path from github.com/axone-protocol/prolog to github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2.
examples/hanoi/main.go Updated import paths from github.com/axone-protocol/prolog to github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2 and from github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/engine to github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2/engine.
examples/initialization/main.go Updated import path from github.com/axone-protocol/prolog to github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2.
examples/sandboxing/main.go Updated import paths from github.com/axone-protocol/prolog to github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2 and from github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/engine to github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2/engine.
interpreter.go Updated import path from github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/engine to github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2/engine.
interpreter_test.go Updated import path from github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/engine to github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2/engine.
scripts/bump-module.sh New script added to update module paths based on the major version specified in a version file.
solutions.go Updated import path from github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/engine to github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2/engine.
solutions_test.go Updated import path from github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/engine to github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2/engine.
version Version updated to 2.0.0.

Possibly related PRs

  • refactor(mod)!: rename the go module of this repository #11: The changes in this PR involve updating import paths for the Prolog library, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR that also updates import paths to version 2 of the Prolog library.
  • Add (preliminary) support for dicts structure #17: This PR introduces new functionality related to dictionaries in Prolog, which may interact with the Prolog interpreter's functionality updated in the main PR, particularly in how predicates and operators are registered and utilized.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
scripts/bump-module.sh (3)

13-14: Verify successful module update

Add verification after updating the module path in go.mod.

   go mod edit -module "${module_name_versioned}"
+  if ! grep -q "^module ${module_name_versioned}\$" go.mod; then
+    echo "❌ Error: failed to update module path in go.mod"
+    exit 1
+  fi
   echo "✅ module name updated to ${module_name_versioned} in go.mod"

25-29: Enhance cleanup verification and add change summary

Add verification of cleanup success and provide a summary of changes made.

   echo "🧹 cleaning up go.sum"
-  go mod tidy
+  if ! go mod tidy; then
+    echo "❌ Error: go mod tidy failed"
+    exit 1
+  fi
+
+  # Print summary of changes
+  echo "📝 Summary of changes:"
+  echo "- Updated module path in go.mod"
+  echo "- Modified $(find . -type f -name "*.go" -exec grep -l "${module_name_versioned}" {} \; | wc -l) Go files"
+  echo "- Created backup in ${backup_dir}"
 else
   echo "🙅version is not greater than 1, no need to update module path"
 fi

1-29: Add script documentation and usage guidelines

Consider adding a header comment block to document:

  1. The purpose and timing of using this script (during major version bumps)
  2. Prerequisites (Go version, jq installation)
  3. Backup location and recovery process
  4. Example usage

This will help future maintainers understand when and how to use this script safely.

 #!/usr/bin/env bash
 
+# bump-module.sh
+#
+# Updates Go module paths when bumping to a new major version.
+# Should be run after updating the version file but before committing changes.
+#
+# Prerequisites:
+#   - Go 1.11 or later (for Go modules support)
+#   - jq command-line tool
+#   - version file containing semantic version (e.g., 2.0.0)
+#
+# Usage:
+#   ./scripts/bump-module.sh
+#
+# The script will:
+#   1. Read major version from 'version' file
+#   2. Update module path in go.mod
+#   3. Update import paths in all .go files
+#   4. Create backups of modified files
+#   5. Run go mod tidy
+#
+# Recovery:
+#   Backups are stored in backup_YYYYMMDD_HHMMSS directory
+
 set -eo pipefail
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eec929d and 0a9bd04.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • go.mod is excluded by !**/*.mod
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
  • cmd/1pl/interpreter.go (1 hunks)
  • cmd/1pl/main.go (1 hunks)
  • examples/call_go_from_prolog/main.go (1 hunks)
  • examples/dcg/main.go (1 hunks)
  • examples/embed_prolog_into_go/main.go (1 hunks)
  • examples/hanoi/main.go (1 hunks)
  • examples/initialization/main.go (1 hunks)
  • examples/sandboxing/main.go (1 hunks)
  • interpreter.go (1 hunks)
  • interpreter_test.go (1 hunks)
  • scripts/bump-module.sh (1 hunks)
  • solutions.go (1 hunks)
  • solutions_test.go (1 hunks)
  • version (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (7)
  • examples/call_go_from_prolog/main.go
  • examples/embed_prolog_into_go/main.go
  • examples/sandboxing/main.go
  • interpreter.go
  • solutions.go
  • solutions_test.go
  • version
🔇 Additional comments (13)
examples/initialization/main.go (2)

7-7: LGTM! Correct usage of semantic import versioning.

The update to /v2 follows Go's semantic import versioning convention for major version changes.

Let's verify the Go module setup:

✅ Verification successful

Import path migration to v2 is complete and consistent

The verification confirms:

  • The module is properly declared as github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2 in go.mod
  • All imports across the codebase consistently use the v2 path
  • No remaining v1 imports were found
  • The migration appears complete with proper usage of both the main package (prolog/v2) and subpackages (prolog/v2/engine)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify proper Go module configuration for v2

# Check if go.mod exists and contains proper v2 module declaration
if [ -f "go.mod" ]; then
    echo "Checking go.mod for v2 module path..."
    cat go.mod
fi

# Check for any remaining v1 imports that might have been missed
echo "Checking for any remaining v1 imports..."
rg "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog\"" --type go

Length of output: 1046


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the consistency of v2 migration across the codebase

# Check all Go imports to ensure consistent use of v2
echo "Checking all Go imports for prolog package..."
rg "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog" --type go -l

# Look for any potential mixed version usage
echo -e "\nChecking for any files with both v1 and v2 imports..."
rg "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog(/v2)?" --type go -A 1 -B 1

Length of output: 2478


7-7: Verify v2 API compatibility across the codebase.

The code usage pattern suggests API compatibility with v2, but let's verify this is consistent across all examples and usage patterns.

Also applies to: 13-17

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information to verify the v2 API compatibility across the codebase.


V2 API usage is consistent across the codebase

The verification shows that:

  • All imports consistently use github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2 or its subpackages
  • No legacy imports of the v1 version were found
  • All prolog initialization patterns use the v2 API consistently with prolog.New()
  • The v2 API is used uniformly across all example files and main implementation
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent v2 migration and usage patterns

# Check for any files still using the old import
echo "Checking for files still using old import path..."
rg "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog\"" --type go

# Look for all Prolog initialization patterns to verify consistent usage
echo "Checking Prolog initialization patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'prolog.New($$$)'

Length of output: 293


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all Go files that import prolog/v2
echo "Files importing prolog v2:"
rg "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2" --type go

# Check all prolog package usages in the codebase
echo -e "\nAll prolog package usages:"
rg "prolog\." --type go -A 2

# Look for any potential version-specific API calls
echo -e "\nChecking for New function calls:"
ast-grep --pattern 'prolog.New'

# Check for any potential mixed version imports
echo -e "\nChecking import statements in all Go files:"
fd -e go -x cat {} | grep -A 1 -B 1 "import"

Length of output: 4924

cmd/1pl/interpreter.go (2)

5-6: LGTM! Verify v2 module setup.

The import path updates follow Go's semantic import versioning convention correctly.

Let's verify the v2 module setup and import consistency:

✅ Verification successful

Import paths and v2 module setup are correctly configured

The verification confirms:

  • Module is properly declared as github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2 in go.mod
  • No remaining v1 imports were found in the codebase
  • All imports consistently use the v2 path across the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify v2 module setup and import consistency

# Check if go.mod exists and contains v2 module declaration
echo "Checking module declaration in go.mod:"
cat go.mod

# Check for any remaining v1 imports that might have been missed
echo -e "\nChecking for any remaining v1 imports:"
rg "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog[^/v2]" --type go

# Check for mixed versions in imports
echo -e "\nChecking for consistency in v2 imports:"
rg "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2" --type go

Length of output: 2318


Line range hint 11-19: Verify API compatibility with v2.

While the implementation remains unchanged, it's important to verify that the v2 API maintains compatibility with the current usage, particularly for:

  • prolog.Interpreter
  • prolog.New
  • engine.NewAtom
  • engine.SkipMaxList
  • engine.VM, engine.Term, engine.Cont, engine.Env, engine.Promise

Let's check for any breaking changes in the v2 API:

✅ Verification successful

API compatibility with v2 has been verified and is consistent

The verification shows that all types and functions used in the code are present in v2 with compatible signatures:

  • prolog.Interpreter and prolog.New maintain their structure and initialization pattern
  • engine.VM, engine.Term, engine.Promise types are present with consistent interfaces
  • Core functions like engine.SkipMaxList and engine.Unify maintain their signatures with (vm *VM, ..., k Cont, env *Env) *Promise pattern
  • All required engine package exports are available and compatible
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for API changes in v2

# Look for type definitions and interfaces
echo "Checking Interpreter type definition:"
ast-grep --pattern 'type Interpreter struct {
  $$$
}'

echo -e "\nChecking for changes in function signatures:"
ast-grep --pattern 'func New($$$) *Interpreter'

echo -e "\nChecking engine package exports:"
ast-grep --pattern 'type (VM|Term|Cont|Env|Promise) $$$'

Length of output: 9160


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the engine package for the specific types and their definitions
echo "Checking VM type:"
ast-grep --pattern 'type VM struct {
  $$$
}'

echo -e "\nChecking Term interface/type:"
ast-grep --pattern 'type Term interface {
  $$$
}'

echo -e "\nChecking Promise type:"
ast-grep --pattern 'type Promise struct {
  $$$
}'

echo -e "\nChecking Cont and Env types:"
ast-grep --pattern 'type (Cont|Env) $$$'

# Let's also verify the specific functions being used
echo -e "\nChecking SkipMaxList and other function signatures:"
rg "func (SkipMaxList|Unify)" -A 1

Length of output: 3021

examples/hanoi/main.go (1)

7-8: LGTM! Verify v2 migration completeness.

The import path updates correctly follow Go's semantic import versioning convention for major version 2.

Let's verify the migration completeness across the codebase:

Since this is a major version upgrade (v2), consider:

  1. Documenting any breaking changes in CHANGELOG.md or UPGRADING.md
  2. Providing migration guidelines for users upgrading from v1
✅ Verification successful

Migration to v2 is complete and consistent

The verification shows:

  • No remaining v1 imports found in the codebase
  • All imports consistently use the v2 path across all Go files
  • Module declaration in go.mod correctly uses v2
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all imports are consistently using v2

# Check for any remaining v1 imports
echo "Checking for any remaining v1 imports..."
rg "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog\"" --type go

# Check for consistent v2 usage
echo "Verifying consistent v2 usage..."
rg "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2" --type go

# Look for potential go.mod updates
echo "Checking go.mod for version declaration..."
rg "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog" go.mod

Length of output: 1587

examples/dcg/main.go (2)

Line range hint 10-15: Documentation remains accurate and helpful

The example documentation accurately describes the functionality and usage, and remains valid after the v2 upgrade.


7-7: LGTM! Verify v2 module setup

The import path update follows Go module versioning conventions correctly.

Let's verify the v2 module setup and consistency:

✅ Verification successful

The previous results confirmed that the module is properly set up for v2, but we need to verify that all example files are consistently using the v2 import path. Let's check the actual import statements in all example files.


✓ Import path update is correctly implemented

The verification confirms:

  • Module is properly defined as v2 in go.mod
  • All example files consistently use the v2 import path
  • Both direct imports (github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2) and subpackage imports (github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2/engine) follow the correct versioning pattern
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify v2 module setup and consistent versioning across examples

# Check if go.mod exists and contains v2 module definition
echo "Checking module definition:"
cat go.mod

# Verify consistent versioning across all example files
echo -e "\nChecking version consistency across examples:"
rg -l "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog" examples/

Length of output: 1201


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if all example files are using the v2 import path
echo "Checking v2 import consistency:"
rg "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog(/v[0-9]+)?" examples/ -A 1 -B 1

Length of output: 1208

cmd/1pl/main.go (3)

19-20: LGTM! Import paths correctly updated for v2

The import paths have been properly updated to use the v2 module path following Go module versioning conventions.


19-20: Verify complete v2 migration across the codebase

Let's ensure all imports are consistently updated to v2 and no v1 imports remain.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the results, I can generate the final response as we have comprehensive information about the imports across the codebase.

Migration to v2 is complete and consistent

The verification shows that:

  • No v1 imports (github.com/axone-protocol/prolog" or github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/engine") are present in any Go files
  • All imports consistently use v2 paths (github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2 and github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2/engine)
  • Additional check for any prolog-related imports confirms no other version-specific imports exist
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining v1 imports and verify v2 migration completeness

# Search for any remaining v1 imports
echo "Checking for remaining v1 imports..."
rg -l "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog\"" --type go
rg -l "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/engine\"" --type go

# Search for v2 imports to verify consistent usage
echo "Verifying v2 imports..."
rg -l "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2\"" --type go
rg -l "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2/engine\"" --type go

# Look for potential version-specific imports that might need updating
echo "Checking for other potential prolog package imports..."
rg -l "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/" --type go

Length of output: 1241


19-20: Verify v2 API compatibility

Since this is a major version upgrade (v1 to v2), please ensure:

  1. All used types and methods are still compatible
  2. No deprecated features are being used
  3. Any new v2 best practices are followed

Consider checking the v2 changelog or migration guide for any breaking changes that need to be addressed.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response:

v2 upgrade appears compatible with no action needed

The codebase shows consistent usage of v2 imports with no mixing of versions. The repository README indicates this is a hard fork of the original project with specific customizations, and all code consistently uses the v2 engine types and methods as intended. The changes mentioned in the README (like capped variables, deterministic maps) are infrastructure-level changes that don't affect the API usage we see in the code.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Look for potential API compatibility issues

# Search for types and methods used from the prolog package
echo "Checking usage of prolog package types and methods..."
ast-grep --pattern 'prolog.$_'

# Search for types and methods used from the engine package
echo "Checking usage of engine package types and methods..."
ast-grep --pattern 'engine.$_'

# Look for any existing changelog or migration guide
echo "Checking for migration documentation..."
fd -g 'CHANGELOG*' -g 'MIGRATION*' -g 'UPGRADING*'

Length of output: 7841


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the repository for any documentation about v2 changes

# Check README files
echo "Checking README files..."
fd -g 'README*' -x cat {}

# Check for any documentation in docs directory
echo "Looking for docs directory content..."
fd -g '*.md' -d 1 docs/ -x cat {} 2>/dev/null

# Check git history for commit messages related to v2
echo "Checking recent commits mentioning v2..."
git log --oneline -n 10 --grep="v2"

# Check imports to see if we're mixing v1 and v2
echo "Checking for mixed version imports..."
rg "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v[12]" --type go

Length of output: 7239

interpreter_test.go (3)

14-14: LGTM! Import path updated to v2

The import path has been correctly updated to use version 2 of the Prolog engine, following semantic versioning best practices.


Line range hint 1-1000: Excellent test coverage and organization

The test suite demonstrates high quality with:

  • Comprehensive coverage of Prolog functionalities
  • Well-structured test organization using subtests
  • Good mix of success and error test cases
  • Clear test case descriptions

Line range hint 1-1000: Well-implemented test patterns

The test implementations demonstrate good practices:

  • Effective use of table-driven tests
  • Thorough error handling verification
  • Clear assertions and error messages
  • Good use of test helpers to reduce duplication

scripts/bump-module.sh Show resolved Hide resolved
scripts/bump-module.sh Show resolved Hide resolved
scripts/bump-module.sh Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #22   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.87%   97.87%           
=======================================
  Files          24       24           
  Lines        7844     7844           
=======================================
  Hits         7677     7677           
  Misses        134      134           
  Partials       33       33           
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
cmd/1pl/interpreter.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)
interpreter.go 97.98% <ø> (ø)
solutions.go 98.42% <ø> (ø)

🚨 Try these New Features:

@ccamel
Copy link
Member Author

ccamel commented Nov 25, 2024

@coderabbitai resolve

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 25, 2024

✅ Actions performed

Comments resolved.

@ccamel ccamel merged commit b16f8f9 into main Nov 25, 2024
3 checks passed
@ccamel ccamel deleted the chore/prepare-v2 branch November 25, 2024 17:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant