-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Chore/prepare v2 #22
Chore/prepare v2 #22
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request primarily updates the import paths for the Prolog library and its engine across multiple files to reference version 2 of the library. The changes affect various components, including the interpreter, main application files, and examples, ensuring that all references to the Prolog library are consistent with the new version. The core functionality and logic within these files remain unchanged, maintaining existing behaviors while transitioning to the updated library structure. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
scripts/bump-module.sh (3)
13-14
: Verify successful module updateAdd verification after updating the module path in go.mod.
go mod edit -module "${module_name_versioned}" + if ! grep -q "^module ${module_name_versioned}\$" go.mod; then + echo "❌ Error: failed to update module path in go.mod" + exit 1 + fi echo "✅ module name updated to ${module_name_versioned} in go.mod"
25-29
: Enhance cleanup verification and add change summaryAdd verification of cleanup success and provide a summary of changes made.
echo "🧹 cleaning up go.sum" - go mod tidy + if ! go mod tidy; then + echo "❌ Error: go mod tidy failed" + exit 1 + fi + + # Print summary of changes + echo "📝 Summary of changes:" + echo "- Updated module path in go.mod" + echo "- Modified $(find . -type f -name "*.go" -exec grep -l "${module_name_versioned}" {} \; | wc -l) Go files" + echo "- Created backup in ${backup_dir}" else echo "🙅version is not greater than 1, no need to update module path" fi
1-29
: Add script documentation and usage guidelinesConsider adding a header comment block to document:
- The purpose and timing of using this script (during major version bumps)
- Prerequisites (Go version, jq installation)
- Backup location and recovery process
- Example usage
This will help future maintainers understand when and how to use this script safely.
#!/usr/bin/env bash +# bump-module.sh +# +# Updates Go module paths when bumping to a new major version. +# Should be run after updating the version file but before committing changes. +# +# Prerequisites: +# - Go 1.11 or later (for Go modules support) +# - jq command-line tool +# - version file containing semantic version (e.g., 2.0.0) +# +# Usage: +# ./scripts/bump-module.sh +# +# The script will: +# 1. Read major version from 'version' file +# 2. Update module path in go.mod +# 3. Update import paths in all .go files +# 4. Create backups of modified files +# 5. Run go mod tidy +# +# Recovery: +# Backups are stored in backup_YYYYMMDD_HHMMSS directory + set -eo pipefail
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
go.mod
is excluded by!**/*.mod
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
cmd/1pl/interpreter.go
(1 hunks)cmd/1pl/main.go
(1 hunks)examples/call_go_from_prolog/main.go
(1 hunks)examples/dcg/main.go
(1 hunks)examples/embed_prolog_into_go/main.go
(1 hunks)examples/hanoi/main.go
(1 hunks)examples/initialization/main.go
(1 hunks)examples/sandboxing/main.go
(1 hunks)interpreter.go
(1 hunks)interpreter_test.go
(1 hunks)scripts/bump-module.sh
(1 hunks)solutions.go
(1 hunks)solutions_test.go
(1 hunks)version
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (7)
- examples/call_go_from_prolog/main.go
- examples/embed_prolog_into_go/main.go
- examples/sandboxing/main.go
- interpreter.go
- solutions.go
- solutions_test.go
- version
🔇 Additional comments (13)
examples/initialization/main.go (2)
7-7
: LGTM! Correct usage of semantic import versioning.
The update to /v2
follows Go's semantic import versioning convention for major version changes.
Let's verify the Go module setup:
✅ Verification successful
Import path migration to v2 is complete and consistent
The verification confirms:
- The module is properly declared as
github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2
in go.mod - All imports across the codebase consistently use the v2 path
- No remaining v1 imports were found
- The migration appears complete with proper usage of both the main package (
prolog/v2
) and subpackages (prolog/v2/engine
)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify proper Go module configuration for v2
# Check if go.mod exists and contains proper v2 module declaration
if [ -f "go.mod" ]; then
echo "Checking go.mod for v2 module path..."
cat go.mod
fi
# Check for any remaining v1 imports that might have been missed
echo "Checking for any remaining v1 imports..."
rg "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog\"" --type go
Length of output: 1046
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the consistency of v2 migration across the codebase
# Check all Go imports to ensure consistent use of v2
echo "Checking all Go imports for prolog package..."
rg "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog" --type go -l
# Look for any potential mixed version usage
echo -e "\nChecking for any files with both v1 and v2 imports..."
rg "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog(/v2)?" --type go -A 1 -B 1
Length of output: 2478
7-7
: Verify v2 API compatibility across the codebase.
The code usage pattern suggests API compatibility with v2, but let's verify this is consistent across all examples and usage patterns.
Also applies to: 13-17
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify the v2 API compatibility across the codebase.
V2 API usage is consistent across the codebase
The verification shows that:
- All imports consistently use
github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2
or its subpackages - No legacy imports of the v1 version were found
- All prolog initialization patterns use the v2 API consistently with
prolog.New()
- The v2 API is used uniformly across all example files and main implementation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent v2 migration and usage patterns
# Check for any files still using the old import
echo "Checking for files still using old import path..."
rg "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog\"" --type go
# Look for all Prolog initialization patterns to verify consistent usage
echo "Checking Prolog initialization patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'prolog.New($$$)'
Length of output: 293
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all Go files that import prolog/v2
echo "Files importing prolog v2:"
rg "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2" --type go
# Check all prolog package usages in the codebase
echo -e "\nAll prolog package usages:"
rg "prolog\." --type go -A 2
# Look for any potential version-specific API calls
echo -e "\nChecking for New function calls:"
ast-grep --pattern 'prolog.New'
# Check for any potential mixed version imports
echo -e "\nChecking import statements in all Go files:"
fd -e go -x cat {} | grep -A 1 -B 1 "import"
Length of output: 4924
cmd/1pl/interpreter.go (2)
5-6
: LGTM! Verify v2 module setup.
The import path updates follow Go's semantic import versioning convention correctly.
Let's verify the v2 module setup and import consistency:
✅ Verification successful
Import paths and v2 module setup are correctly configured
The verification confirms:
- Module is properly declared as
github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2
in go.mod - No remaining v1 imports were found in the codebase
- All imports consistently use the v2 path across the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify v2 module setup and import consistency
# Check if go.mod exists and contains v2 module declaration
echo "Checking module declaration in go.mod:"
cat go.mod
# Check for any remaining v1 imports that might have been missed
echo -e "\nChecking for any remaining v1 imports:"
rg "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog[^/v2]" --type go
# Check for mixed versions in imports
echo -e "\nChecking for consistency in v2 imports:"
rg "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2" --type go
Length of output: 2318
Line range hint 11-19
: Verify API compatibility with v2.
While the implementation remains unchanged, it's important to verify that the v2 API maintains compatibility with the current usage, particularly for:
prolog.Interpreter
prolog.New
engine.NewAtom
engine.SkipMaxList
engine.VM
,engine.Term
,engine.Cont
,engine.Env
,engine.Promise
Let's check for any breaking changes in the v2 API:
✅ Verification successful
API compatibility with v2 has been verified and is consistent
The verification shows that all types and functions used in the code are present in v2 with compatible signatures:
prolog.Interpreter
andprolog.New
maintain their structure and initialization patternengine.VM
,engine.Term
,engine.Promise
types are present with consistent interfaces- Core functions like
engine.SkipMaxList
andengine.Unify
maintain their signatures with(vm *VM, ..., k Cont, env *Env) *Promise
pattern - All required engine package exports are available and compatible
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for API changes in v2
# Look for type definitions and interfaces
echo "Checking Interpreter type definition:"
ast-grep --pattern 'type Interpreter struct {
$$$
}'
echo -e "\nChecking for changes in function signatures:"
ast-grep --pattern 'func New($$$) *Interpreter'
echo -e "\nChecking engine package exports:"
ast-grep --pattern 'type (VM|Term|Cont|Env|Promise) $$$'
Length of output: 9160
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the engine package for the specific types and their definitions
echo "Checking VM type:"
ast-grep --pattern 'type VM struct {
$$$
}'
echo -e "\nChecking Term interface/type:"
ast-grep --pattern 'type Term interface {
$$$
}'
echo -e "\nChecking Promise type:"
ast-grep --pattern 'type Promise struct {
$$$
}'
echo -e "\nChecking Cont and Env types:"
ast-grep --pattern 'type (Cont|Env) $$$'
# Let's also verify the specific functions being used
echo -e "\nChecking SkipMaxList and other function signatures:"
rg "func (SkipMaxList|Unify)" -A 1
Length of output: 3021
examples/hanoi/main.go (1)
7-8
: LGTM! Verify v2 migration completeness.
The import path updates correctly follow Go's semantic import versioning convention for major version 2.
Let's verify the migration completeness across the codebase:
Since this is a major version upgrade (v2), consider:
- Documenting any breaking changes in CHANGELOG.md or UPGRADING.md
- Providing migration guidelines for users upgrading from v1
✅ Verification successful
Migration to v2 is complete and consistent
The verification shows:
- No remaining v1 imports found in the codebase
- All imports consistently use the v2 path across all Go files
- Module declaration in go.mod correctly uses v2
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all imports are consistently using v2
# Check for any remaining v1 imports
echo "Checking for any remaining v1 imports..."
rg "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog\"" --type go
# Check for consistent v2 usage
echo "Verifying consistent v2 usage..."
rg "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2" --type go
# Look for potential go.mod updates
echo "Checking go.mod for version declaration..."
rg "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog" go.mod
Length of output: 1587
examples/dcg/main.go (2)
Line range hint 10-15
: Documentation remains accurate and helpful
The example documentation accurately describes the functionality and usage, and remains valid after the v2 upgrade.
7-7
: LGTM! Verify v2 module setup
The import path update follows Go module versioning conventions correctly.
Let's verify the v2 module setup and consistency:
✅ Verification successful
The previous results confirmed that the module is properly set up for v2, but we need to verify that all example files are consistently using the v2 import path. Let's check the actual import statements in all example files.
✓ Import path update is correctly implemented
The verification confirms:
- Module is properly defined as v2 in go.mod
- All example files consistently use the v2 import path
- Both direct imports (
github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2
) and subpackage imports (github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2/engine
) follow the correct versioning pattern
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify v2 module setup and consistent versioning across examples
# Check if go.mod exists and contains v2 module definition
echo "Checking module definition:"
cat go.mod
# Verify consistent versioning across all example files
echo -e "\nChecking version consistency across examples:"
rg -l "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog" examples/
Length of output: 1201
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if all example files are using the v2 import path
echo "Checking v2 import consistency:"
rg "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog(/v[0-9]+)?" examples/ -A 1 -B 1
Length of output: 1208
cmd/1pl/main.go (3)
19-20
: LGTM! Import paths correctly updated for v2
The import paths have been properly updated to use the v2 module path following Go module versioning conventions.
19-20
: Verify complete v2 migration across the codebase
Let's ensure all imports are consistently updated to v2 and no v1 imports remain.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can generate the final response as we have comprehensive information about the imports across the codebase.
Migration to v2 is complete and consistent
The verification shows that:
- No v1 imports (
github.com/axone-protocol/prolog"
orgithub.com/axone-protocol/prolog/engine"
) are present in any Go files - All imports consistently use v2 paths (
github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2
andgithub.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2/engine
) - Additional check for any prolog-related imports confirms no other version-specific imports exist
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining v1 imports and verify v2 migration completeness
# Search for any remaining v1 imports
echo "Checking for remaining v1 imports..."
rg -l "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog\"" --type go
rg -l "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/engine\"" --type go
# Search for v2 imports to verify consistent usage
echo "Verifying v2 imports..."
rg -l "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2\"" --type go
rg -l "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v2/engine\"" --type go
# Look for potential version-specific imports that might need updating
echo "Checking for other potential prolog package imports..."
rg -l "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/" --type go
Length of output: 1241
19-20
: Verify v2 API compatibility
Since this is a major version upgrade (v1 to v2), please ensure:
- All used types and methods are still compatible
- No deprecated features are being used
- Any new v2 best practices are followed
Consider checking the v2 changelog or migration guide for any breaking changes that need to be addressed.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response:
v2 upgrade appears compatible with no action needed
The codebase shows consistent usage of v2 imports with no mixing of versions. The repository README indicates this is a hard fork of the original project with specific customizations, and all code consistently uses the v2 engine types and methods as intended. The changes mentioned in the README (like capped variables, deterministic maps) are infrastructure-level changes that don't affect the API usage we see in the code.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Look for potential API compatibility issues
# Search for types and methods used from the prolog package
echo "Checking usage of prolog package types and methods..."
ast-grep --pattern 'prolog.$_'
# Search for types and methods used from the engine package
echo "Checking usage of engine package types and methods..."
ast-grep --pattern 'engine.$_'
# Look for any existing changelog or migration guide
echo "Checking for migration documentation..."
fd -g 'CHANGELOG*' -g 'MIGRATION*' -g 'UPGRADING*'
Length of output: 7841
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the repository for any documentation about v2 changes
# Check README files
echo "Checking README files..."
fd -g 'README*' -x cat {}
# Check for any documentation in docs directory
echo "Looking for docs directory content..."
fd -g '*.md' -d 1 docs/ -x cat {} 2>/dev/null
# Check git history for commit messages related to v2
echo "Checking recent commits mentioning v2..."
git log --oneline -n 10 --grep="v2"
# Check imports to see if we're mixing v1 and v2
echo "Checking for mixed version imports..."
rg "github.com/axone-protocol/prolog/v[12]" --type go
Length of output: 7239
interpreter_test.go (3)
14-14
: LGTM! Import path updated to v2
The import path has been correctly updated to use version 2 of the Prolog engine, following semantic versioning best practices.
Line range hint 1-1000
: Excellent test coverage and organization
The test suite demonstrates high quality with:
- Comprehensive coverage of Prolog functionalities
- Well-structured test organization using subtests
- Good mix of success and error test cases
- Clear test case descriptions
Line range hint 1-1000
: Well-implemented test patterns
The test implementations demonstrate good practices:
- Effective use of table-driven tests
- Thorough error handling verification
- Clear assertions and error messages
- Good use of test helpers to reduce duplication
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅ @@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #22 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 97.87% 97.87%
=======================================
Files 24 24
Lines 7844 7844
=======================================
Hits 7677 7677
Misses 134 134
Partials 33 33
🚨 Try these New Features:
|
@coderabbitai resolve |
✅ Actions performedComments resolved. |
Self explanatory.
See axone-protocol/axoned#586 for reference.