-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Resnet50 CUB 2011 performance #2
Comments
@jeong-tae |
@Lzc6996 Okay, I will try that and let you know results |
@jeong-tae |
@GuoleiSun |
@jeong-tae Thank you. |
Can you provide the hyperparameters of the training of the ResNet50? Thank you. |
Hi,
I am looking for the best performance on CUB 2011 and i find that you've got the 84.5% accuracy with resnet50. You mentioned that you've done fine-tuning very carefully and got this result.
I also try to reproduce this performance with resnet50 on Pytorch framework. but doesn't work.
Here is my setting and let me know what kind of setting did you use. there is large difference you've got.
Training argumentation:
Image rescale size: 448 (keep aspect ratio)
image random crop(448 size)
random Hflip
normalization
batch size 16
initial lr: 1e-3
lr decay(*0.1) at 30, 60 epoch
Test argumentation
Image rescale size: 448 (keep aspect ratio)
image center crop(448 size)
normalization
I employ pretrained resnet50 from imagenet that provided by Pytorch community.
So far, i got about 83% accuracy on resnet152. with resnet50, still less than 80%
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: