-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hardware accelerated network packet processing? #129
Comments
Hi @andrewseddon , for your intel NIC we have nothing ready yet. ( at the moment we can acellerate on NVIDIA NICs ) The mentioned zero copy stragegies listed in your document also has limitations if the camera count gets larger. To check, if your current setup would be capable to handle full zero-copy, can you show the output
|
Channel parameters for enp129s0f0np0: This is on our Intel 810 NIC. But we are happy to switch to NVIDIA NIC's if you have a means to accelerate packet processing on them. Would you recommend something like the ConnectX-6 Dx ? |
One easy option to accelerate on Nvidia NIC is to use https://docs.nvidia.com/networking/display/xliov3402 xlio is a LD_PRELOAD library that will accelerate the UDP receive without code changes. For our work on rdma. |
Great, I'll give that a go! We could work with either GPU or CPU memory. Right now, we just do H264 compression and have tested CPU and GPU-based compression - both work great. |
Is there a way to offload the network packet processing from the CPU? We have a system using around 20 cameras connected to a server via a 100Gbit Intel NIC. Packet processing alone takes up about 50% of the CPU. There are many strategies for offloading this networking processing as detailed here. Does Basler and gst-plugin-pylon support any of them?
I assume NVMM alone does not help here, as the CPU still does the header stripping, which is then fed into GPU memory.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: