You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the Bug
The penalty formula on line 10 incorrectly includes notional transfers of fuel away from the organization in calculating the renewable requirement penalty. As a result, organizations are erroneously penalized for notional transfers of fuel that are reported on another organization's compliance report. For instance, in the example provided, a gasoline category notional transfer away is incorrectly resulting in a renewable requirement penalty.
Expected Behaviour
Only received notional transfers of fuel should contribute to the renewable requirement penalty calculation on line 10. Notional transfers away from the organization should be subtracted from the total on line 10.
Actual Behaviour
Notional transfers of fuel away from the organization are erroneously feeding into the penalty formula as a positive value, resulting in an incorrect renewable requirement penalty. This is likely due to the formula treating the received and transferred values as the same when adding line 5 in to the line 10 formula. If the value is transferred, it should be negative in the formula and if it is received, it should be positive in the formula.
Implications
Organizations may be penalized incorrectly, leading to inaccurate compliance reports and potential financial impacts.
Steps To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behaviour:
User/Role: BCeID
Submit a compliance report with a gasoline category notional transfer away from the organization and no other fuel reported.
Review the penalty calculation on line 10.
Observe that the penalty incorrectly includes the notional transfer away in the renewable requirement penalty.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the Bug
The penalty formula on line 10 incorrectly includes notional transfers of fuel away from the organization in calculating the renewable requirement penalty. As a result, organizations are erroneously penalized for notional transfers of fuel that are reported on another organization's compliance report. For instance, in the example provided, a gasoline category notional transfer away is incorrectly resulting in a renewable requirement penalty.
Expected Behaviour
Only received notional transfers of fuel should contribute to the renewable requirement penalty calculation on line 10. Notional transfers away from the organization should be subtracted from the total on line 10.
Actual Behaviour
Notional transfers of fuel away from the organization are erroneously feeding into the penalty formula as a positive value, resulting in an incorrect renewable requirement penalty. This is likely due to the formula treating the received and transferred values as the same when adding line 5 in to the line 10 formula. If the value is transferred, it should be negative in the formula and if it is received, it should be positive in the formula.
Implications
Organizations may be penalized incorrectly, leading to inaccurate compliance reports and potential financial impacts.
Steps To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behaviour:
User/Role: BCeID
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: