You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Now we use object height/shadow length at a known time to identify a list of potential locations.
If you have a shadow at 2 different times, with length A and length B, then the proportional change from A to B (or B to A) for that specific change from time A to time B corresponds to a specific list of potential locations. The general theory is the same, just the inputs are different.
Having a section that would allow for an input like this could increase the potential use cases for the shadow finder.
In other words. Right now the inputs are:
Object height + Shadow length + known time = locations.
I propose adding a new section with the inputs
Shadow length 1 + Time 1 + Shadow length 2 + Time 2 (essentially: Proportional change in Length + Time difference) = locations
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Now we use object height/shadow length at a known time to identify a list of potential locations.
If you have a shadow at 2 different times, with length A and length B, then the proportional change from A to B (or B to A) for that specific change from time A to time B corresponds to a specific list of potential locations. The general theory is the same, just the inputs are different.
Having a section that would allow for an input like this could increase the potential use cases for the shadow finder.
In other words. Right now the inputs are:
Object height + Shadow length + known time = locations.
I propose adding a new section with the inputs
Shadow length 1 + Time 1 + Shadow length 2 + Time 2 (essentially: Proportional change in Length + Time difference) = locations
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: