You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Attempting to decline this in Collatinus 11.2 gives the neut. sing. n/v/a forms infantns, instead of expected infans
from what I can gather from the code, Root 1 is usually the stem form given in lemmes.la (i.e. here infant)
Either this should be "0:ns" (which the model infans should inherit from its model fortis as 2:0 (remove two characters, add nothing))
or it should be a "4:" (which it would inherit from fortis as K:)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, good point !
It is a mistake that survives in the branch "Master".
The branch which is up-to-date in Medieval, where one reads:
modele:infans
pere:fortis
des:37-39:4:-
des+:18,30,42:1:ē
des+:22,34,46:1:ŭm3
And the neut. sing. n/v/a turn out as the masc./fem. sing. n/v in "fortis".
I have to merge all the corrections that have been made here and there, but time is short.
Thanks for the quick response - and apologies for not reading the ReadMe carefully enough! I should have checked the Medieval branch first... Et merci pour tout votre travail sur Collatinus - c'est une ressource extrêmement utile!
Under the entry 'infans' in modeles.la we see:
Attempting to decline this in Collatinus 11.2 gives the neut. sing. n/v/a forms infantns, instead of expected infans
from what I can gather from the code, Root 1 is usually the stem form given in lemmes.la (i.e. here infant)
Either this should be "0:ns" (which the model infans should inherit from its model fortis as 2:0 (remove two characters, add nothing))
or it should be a "4:" (which it would inherit from fortis as K:)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: