Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Difference Widget - Increase the #288

Open
Chongtc opened this issue Nov 30, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #289
Open

Difference Widget - Increase the #288

Chongtc opened this issue Nov 30, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #289
Labels

Comments

@Chongtc
Copy link

Chongtc commented Nov 30, 2024

Use the Time Series Addon heavily for time series data study and analysis

Currently the widget Difference, the Shift button only allow up to 100 value. For data t the come in daily position, I cant change it anything longer than 100 days. For example, we study the shift by percentage on semi-annually or yearly basis form, this cant be done anymore

What's your use case?

Cant study the Shift in more than 100 days if the time series is daily data Yes, it is limitation currently in Shift button of Difference widget that only allows up to 100 days if daily data is analysed. Cant analyse longer period like semi-annual or yearly frequency in current widget

Use Orange3 Time Series Addon widgets frequently to perform data analysis and time series modelling. Difference widget is one of very useful tools to find some stationarity study of time series data or decomposition of time series data

What's your proposed solution?

To increase the current Difference widget Shift button to allow the input value increased to 999 value point that can cater for daily time series data to analyse longer than 100 days, for example on semi-annual frequency ( 185 ) or yearly (365)

Are there any alternative solutions?
No, currently no solution to change

Snipaste_2024-11-30_17-13-59

@janezd janezd added the snack label Dec 5, 2024
@janezd janezd transferred this issue from biolab/orange3 Dec 6, 2024
@janezd janezd linked a pull request Dec 6, 2024 that will close this issue
1 task
@janezd
Copy link
Collaborator

janezd commented Dec 6, 2024

I don't see why not. :)

Will (probably, if accepted) be fixed in #289.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants