Add transaction builder page #79
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
riverKanies
suggested changes
Oct 31, 2024
|
|
||
| ```rust | ||
| wallet.build_tx() | ||
| .fee_rate(FeeRate::from_sat_per_vb(2.0)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
had to edit to get working:
let mut tx_builder = wallet.build_tx();
tx_builder.fee_rate(FeeRate::from_sat_per_vb(4).unwrap());
```
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks yep! We switched FeeRate types a few versions ago and it went from a float to a u64 I think. Perfect!
thunderbiscuit
force-pushed
the
feature/txbuilder
branch
from
4821578
to
b991581
Compare
thunderbiscuit
force-pushed
the
feature/txbuilder
branch
from
b991581
to
3bb066a
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds the page that deals with the transaction builder.
I'm not sure yet how/if it makes sense to have a runnable example for this but I needed to see the codeblocks first.