You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In some of the scatter-plot graphs, the scaling is off and the graph becomes illegible. This seems to happen when the number of cases grows too large; it's evident in most country graphs. It only affects scatter plots.
The latter shows the crossover in action - some of the countries have legible-sized plot dots, others do not. And looking backward through revisions you can see the issue start with the US and then gradually take over all countries. I would assume this is very easy to fix; if it's a glitch in the graph software raising the ymax would be likely to do it.
Entirely unrelated commentary that isn't really an issue: India's BA.2.75 graphs are a bit misleading because all or most of their BA.2 is actually a significantly more contagious sub-variant (BA.2.36 maybe?) that would itself be worthy of monitoring had not BA.4/5/2.75 come along. Splitting off this lineage might make things a lot more linear (on the log plots).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In some of the scatter-plot graphs, the scaling is off and the graph becomes illegible. This seems to happen when the number of cases grows too large; it's evident in most country graphs. It only affects scatter plots.
Examples:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/blab/rt-from-frequency-dynamics/master/results/omicron-ba275/figures/omicron-ba275_partitioned-log-cases-BA275.png
https://github.com/blab/rt-from-frequency-dynamics/blob/master/results/omicron-countries-split/figures/omicron-countries-split_partitioned-log-cases-22B.png
The latter shows the crossover in action - some of the countries have legible-sized plot dots, others do not. And looking backward through revisions you can see the issue start with the US and then gradually take over all countries. I would assume this is very easy to fix; if it's a glitch in the graph software raising the ymax would be likely to do it.
Entirely unrelated commentary that isn't really an issue: India's BA.2.75 graphs are a bit misleading because all or most of their BA.2 is actually a significantly more contagious sub-variant (BA.2.36 maybe?) that would itself be worthy of monitoring had not BA.4/5/2.75 come along. Splitting off this lineage might make things a lot more linear (on the log plots).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: