Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lobster-codebeamer shall support query strings #87

Open
phiwuu opened this issue Oct 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

lobster-codebeamer shall support query strings #87

phiwuu opened this issue Oct 8, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
lobster-codebeamer Affects codebeamer integration

Comments

@phiwuu
Copy link
Member

phiwuu commented Oct 8, 2024

Instead of providing a codebeamer query ID to lobster-codebeamer, I want to specify the query string (in cbQL) directly. The advantage is that, I have code ownership over the query string in the git repository of the lobster CI job. This is not possible with the content of a query ID, as there is no concept like "code ownership" or "review" in codebeamer admin pages.

Currently lobster-codebeamer uses the endpoint /v3/trackers/{tracker id}/reports/{reportId}/items.
The new feature shall use the endpoint /v3/items/query.

@phiwuu phiwuu added the lobster-codebeamer Affects codebeamer integration label Oct 8, 2024
mugdhadhole1 added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2024
GitHub issue: #87
Query string (CBQL query) can be now passed as a command line argument to the lobster codebeamer tool
mugdhadhole1 added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2024
GitHub issue: #87
Query string (CBQL query) can be now passed as a command line argument to the lobster codebeamer tool
mugdhadhole1 added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 17, 2024
…ment (#158)

Implemented the missing changes in the lobster-codebeamer supports query
string argument

GitHub issue: #87
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lobster-codebeamer Affects codebeamer integration
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants